welcomes healthy public debate
(set aside: petty squabbles over semantics or projected conflict, or take it to my talkpage_
[1])
<> grunt work/pet peevy project on improving access and use of talkpage archives (one early example)
just when I think something should be obvious enough to assume, someone comes along to challenge and question. fair enough, i only ask that you do so honestly and with some humility. then i will do the same. or just IAR if you're feeling lucky, p-
••• i believe that NPOV is the strongest pillar of the 5 we attempt to hold up.
but i also recognize the subtleties of bias vs balance
- "when there are disagreements about content, referring to other editors is not always a personal attack." (in WP:NPA - Avoiding personal attacks)
- "pointing out an editor's relevant conflict of interest and its relevance to the discussion at hand is not considered a personal attack" (2nd bullet point of What is considered to be a personal attack?
welcomes healthy public debate
(set aside: petty squabbles over semantics or projected conflict, or take it to my talkpage_
[1])
<> grunt work/pet peevy project on improving access and use of talkpage archives (one early example)
just when I think something should be obvious enough to assume, someone comes along to challenge and question. fair enough, i only ask that you do so honestly and with some humility. then i will do the same. or just IAR if you're feeling lucky, p-
••• i believe that NPOV is the strongest pillar of the 5 we attempt to hold up.
but i also recognize the subtleties of bias vs balance
- "when there are disagreements about content, referring to other editors is not always a personal attack." (in WP:NPA - Avoiding personal attacks)
- "pointing out an editor's relevant conflict of interest and its relevance to the discussion at hand is not considered a personal attack" (2nd bullet point of What is considered to be a personal attack?