Reason: There is no such person, there are multiple Directors-General of the various Directorates-General, but there is no Director-General of the entire European Commission
Reason: This is
original research, also the topic is not
notable. The history of Ibadism is clearly notable, but a history of research on the topic is not.
Reason: Some repetition of content in
Bracero program, no indication that the Bracero Program in Pomona is a notable topic in its own right needing a separate article.
Reason: PhDs can be in thousands of subjects, we don't need an article on each one. This also looks like a
WP:PROMO for Carleton University. Fails
WP:GNG,
WP:NOTDIR.
Reason: Degrees can be in thousands of subjects, we don't need an article on each one. This also looks like a
WP:PROMO for Carleton University. Fails
WP:GNG,
WP:NOTDIR.
Reason: Fails
WP:ORGCRIT, a redirect not appropriate due to possible confusion with the historical Wesleyan Methodist Church society of the same name which appears more notable.
Reason: Fails
WP:GNG. states. Regrading international appearances the book Wounded Tiger: A History of Cricket in Pakistan states in a footnote "a curious feature of this team was the selection of numbers 10 and 11, Mariam Anwar and Shabana Latif. Neither of them bowled or kept wicket, and neither reached the crease in either Pakistan innings. Anwar scored three runs in seven one-day appearances, and Latif scored none at all in three innings in four one-day matches. Like so many players in social cricket, it looks as though they were making up the numbers
Reason: Fails
WP:GNG. Regarding international appearances the book Wounded Tiger: A History of Cricket in Pakistan states in a footnote "a curious feature of this team was the selection of numbers 10 and 11, Mariam Anwar and Shabana Latif. Neither of them bowled or kept wicket, and neither reached the crease in either Pakistan innings. Anwar scored three runs in seven one-day appearances, and Latif scored none at all in three innings in four one-day matches. Like so many players in social cricket, it looks as though they were making up the numbers"
Reason: Our
relevant guidelines suggest subjects notable only for one event. In this case "reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event" and the "person otherwise remains, and is likely to remain, a low-profile individual".
Reason: An
indiscriminate list. People with no connection with Italy gaining citizenship to play football for the national team might be a notable topic, but simply being born abroad is not.
Reason: Totally non-notable business, fails
WP:ORG. The coverage in the article is about the owner displaying a flag, but there is no in-depth coverage of the cafe itself.
Reason: No
reliable sources suggesting Tesla ever did or said these things. The book referred to in the text "Nikola Tesla and The 369 Code" is self-published and not a reliable source.
Reason:
WP:FANCRUFT, fails
WP:GNG. It was deleted from the main article because it was excessive detail, so it certainly doesn't warrant its own article.
Reason: The topic is not
notable. There is space for this content in the main article but I note it was previously
deleted from there in a purge of excessive detail.
Reason: Fails
WP:GNG. This term as used by Ghomshei is not discussed in depth in reliable sources (the top Google search result for يأيها الذين آمنوا اهل ایمان is this page)
Reason: There's no source for the entire list, which means it's original research and not verifiable - there could be many gradients steeper than those on this list which are not listed. Claiming these are the steepest gradients is therefore misleading.
Reason: There is no such person, there are multiple Directors-General of the various Directorates-General, but there is no Director-General of the entire European Commission
Reason: This is
original research, also the topic is not
notable. The history of Ibadism is clearly notable, but a history of research on the topic is not.
Reason: Some repetition of content in
Bracero program, no indication that the Bracero Program in Pomona is a notable topic in its own right needing a separate article.
Reason: PhDs can be in thousands of subjects, we don't need an article on each one. This also looks like a
WP:PROMO for Carleton University. Fails
WP:GNG,
WP:NOTDIR.
Reason: Degrees can be in thousands of subjects, we don't need an article on each one. This also looks like a
WP:PROMO for Carleton University. Fails
WP:GNG,
WP:NOTDIR.
Reason: Fails
WP:ORGCRIT, a redirect not appropriate due to possible confusion with the historical Wesleyan Methodist Church society of the same name which appears more notable.
Reason: Fails
WP:GNG. states. Regrading international appearances the book Wounded Tiger: A History of Cricket in Pakistan states in a footnote "a curious feature of this team was the selection of numbers 10 and 11, Mariam Anwar and Shabana Latif. Neither of them bowled or kept wicket, and neither reached the crease in either Pakistan innings. Anwar scored three runs in seven one-day appearances, and Latif scored none at all in three innings in four one-day matches. Like so many players in social cricket, it looks as though they were making up the numbers
Reason: Fails
WP:GNG. Regarding international appearances the book Wounded Tiger: A History of Cricket in Pakistan states in a footnote "a curious feature of this team was the selection of numbers 10 and 11, Mariam Anwar and Shabana Latif. Neither of them bowled or kept wicket, and neither reached the crease in either Pakistan innings. Anwar scored three runs in seven one-day appearances, and Latif scored none at all in three innings in four one-day matches. Like so many players in social cricket, it looks as though they were making up the numbers"
Reason: Our
relevant guidelines suggest subjects notable only for one event. In this case "reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event" and the "person otherwise remains, and is likely to remain, a low-profile individual".
Reason: An
indiscriminate list. People with no connection with Italy gaining citizenship to play football for the national team might be a notable topic, but simply being born abroad is not.
Reason: Totally non-notable business, fails
WP:ORG. The coverage in the article is about the owner displaying a flag, but there is no in-depth coverage of the cafe itself.
Reason: No
reliable sources suggesting Tesla ever did or said these things. The book referred to in the text "Nikola Tesla and The 369 Code" is self-published and not a reliable source.
Reason:
WP:FANCRUFT, fails
WP:GNG. It was deleted from the main article because it was excessive detail, so it certainly doesn't warrant its own article.
Reason: The topic is not
notable. There is space for this content in the main article but I note it was previously
deleted from there in a purge of excessive detail.
Reason: Fails
WP:GNG. This term as used by Ghomshei is not discussed in depth in reliable sources (the top Google search result for يأيها الذين آمنوا اهل ایمان is this page)
Reason: There's no source for the entire list, which means it's original research and not verifiable - there could be many gradients steeper than those on this list which are not listed. Claiming these are the steepest gradients is therefore misleading.