Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For other uses, see Marrakesh Treaty (disambiguation).
Marrakesh VIP Treaty
Marrakesh Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works for Persons Who Are Blind, Visually Impaired or Otherwise Print Disabled
TypeMultilateral
Signed28 June 2013 (2013-06-28)
Location Marrakesh, Morocco
Effective30 September 2016 (2016-09-30)
ConditionRatification of 20 parties
Signatories80 [1]
Parties48 (75 countries including EU's 28 member states) as of 19 March 2019 [2]
Depositary World Intellectual Property Organization
Countries that are party to the Marrakesh Treaty or that are bound by it as members of the European Union, as of 19 March 2019 [2]

The Marrakesh Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works for Persons Who Are Blind, Visually Impaired or Otherwise Print Disabled (also known as the Marrakesh VIP Treaty, occasionally abbreviated as MVT [3]) is a treaty in the area of copyright law adopted in Marrakesh, Morocco, on 27 June 2013. The treaty allows for copyright exceptions to facilitate the creation of accessible versions of books and other copyrighted works for visually impaired persons. It sets a norm for countries ratifying the treaty to have a domestic copyright exception covering these activities, and allowing for the import and export of such materials.

The Marrakesh Treaty entered into force on 30 September 2016, three months after the accession of the twentieth party.

Contents of the treaty

Eligible parties

The Marrakesh Treaty is open for ratification or accession to all of the—currently 191 (as of March 2019) [4]—member states of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). [5] Membership in other WIPO-administered treaties, such as the WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT), is not required. WIPO's General Assembly can also admit an intergovernmental organisation to the Marrakesh Treaty if the organisation was authorised to join the treaty by its members and can, in the areas covered by the treaty, enact legislation that is binding on all its members. [6] As a "concrete application of this general rule" [7], it is expressly stated that the European Union (EU), which issued a declaration at the Diplomatic Conference in Marrakesh confirming its compliance with these requirements, is entitled to join. [8]

These eligibility criteria are effectively the same as in other WIPO-administered copyright treaties. [9]

Basic structure and terminology

Beneficiary persons

As the Marrakesh Treaty's full name suggests, it is not intended to facilitate the wider public's access to works, but is specifically aimed at addressing the situation of blind (1), visually impaired (2) or otherwise print disabled (3) individuals. The Treaty collectively refers to them as "beneficiary persons". [10]

(1) While "blind" individuals are expressly mentioned, [11] the term "blind" is nowhere defined in the Marrakesh Treaty. It has been suggested that this allows countries to use existing, national definitions of blindness (which often do not require a total loss of visual acuity or visual field). [12] The need for an exact definition of "blind" in the Marrakesh Treaty is, however, lessened by the fact that the presence of a substantial visual impairment is sufficient to qualify for the benefits provided under the treaty (see next paragraph).

(2) Aside from the blind, the Marrakesh Treaty also benefits those who have "a visual impairment or a perceptual or reading disability which cannot be improved to give visual function substantially equivalent to that of a person who has no such impairment or disability and so is unable to read printed works to substantially the same degree as a person without an impairment or disability". [13] This clarifies that an individual's visual impairment does not need to rise to the level of blindness to justify protection under the Treaty. It also extends the group of beneficiaries to persons whose visual system is unimpaired but whose ability to read is instead constrained by a disability affecting the processing of visual information or its interpretation as language. According to commentators, this group of individuals includes, among others, people suffering from severe dyslexia. [14] As regards visual impairments, the provision does not extend to individuals whose normal vision can be restored through the use of glasses or lenses. [15] A challenge posed by this approach is that whether a given condition can be sufficiently improved is, in practice, highly dependant on the availability of treatment. While it may be objectively easy to mitigate the effects of a given visual impairment, the affected individual may live in an area of the world where the necessary medical services are not readily available, or where the cost of treatment is prohibitively high. Still, it is widely assumed that individuals, to qualify as beneficiaries, need to undergo certain diagnostic procedures and treatments, [16] while an agreed statement to the Marrakesh Treaty clarifies that it is not necessary to exhaust all possible medical diagnostic procedures and treatments. [17]

(3) Finally, the scope of beneficiaries includes persons that are "otherwise unable, through physical disability, to hold or manipulate a book or to focus or move the eyes to the extent that would be normally acceptable for reading". [18] In the literature, one commentator points to amputation, chronic arthritis, paraplegia and Parkinson's disease as examples of such a condition; [19] others mention quadriplegia, cerebral palsy, as well as motor-neuron and neurodegenerative diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). [20]

It is worth noting that the Marrakesh Treaty does not—unlike some national laws—stipulate different scopes of operation dependent on the nature of the beneficiary: All of the benefits it provides for are to be provided to all beneficiary persons. [21]

Works covered

The Marrakesh Treaty is concerned solely with "literary and artistic works" pursuant to the Berne Convention "in the form of text, notation and/or related illustrations". [22] It is common for treaties in the area of copyright law to build upon definitions from the (repeatedly revised) Berne Convention of 1886, which today is adhered to by almost all states of the world. [23] The limitation to copies "in the form of text, notation and/or related illustrations" was specifically developped for the Marrakesh Treaty and is novel to international copyright law. [24]

The term "literary and artistic works" is defined in Berne Article 2 as encompassing "every production in the literary, scientific and artistic domain". The definition is very broad, considerably broader than a common understanding of the adjectives "literary", "scientific" and "artistic" might suggest, [25] and extends, inter alia, to books, dramatic works, photographs, maps, drawings, paintings, sculptures, works of applied art, and three-dimensional scientific models. [26] However, due to the limitation to copies "in the form of text, notation and/or related illustrations", the set of qualifying material is effectively narrowed down. For instance, the use of Arthur Miller's Death of a Salesman is facilitated by Marrakesh provided that the specific copy concerned is a text edition of the work (and, therefore, constitutes a copy "in the form of text"), whereas a video recording of a performance of the same work would fall outside the scope of the Marrakesh Treaty. Similarly, the use of a musical composition is facilitated by Marrakesh if it is fixed in notation (say, in sheet music); the use of the same composition in the form of a sound recording, on the other hand, would not be governed by Marrakesh. [27]

Accessible format

Key provisions

Notes

  1. ^ "Marrakesh Treaty Assembly: First (1st Ordinary) Session: Status of the Marrakesh Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works for Persons Who Are Blind, Visually Impaired or Otherwise Print Disabled (MVT/A/1/2 Rev.)" (PDF). WIPO. 28 September 2016. pp. 1, 3. Retrieved 31 March 2019.
  2. ^ a b "Marrakesh Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works for Persons who are Blind, Visually Impaired or Otherwise Print Disabled (Marrakesh 2013): Status on March 19, 2019" (PDF). WIPO. Retrieved 31 March 2019.
  3. ^ See e.g. Zemer and Gaon 2015. The WIPO uses this acronym as well. "Summary of the Marrakesh Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works for Persons Who Are Blind, Visually Impaired, or Otherwise Print Disabled". WIPO. Retrieved 31 March 2019.
  4. ^ "Member States". WIPO. Retrieved 31 March 2019.
  5. ^ Article 15(1) Marrakesh Treaty.
  6. ^ Article 15(2) Marrakesh Treaty.
  7. ^ Ficsor 2002, para 2.39.
  8. ^ Article 15(3) Marrakesh Treaty.
  9. ^ Identical or essentially identical versions can be found in Article 17 WCT, Article 26 WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty (WPPT) and Article 23 Beijing Treaty on Audiovisual Performances. For the drafting history of this set of provisions in the context of the WCT, see Ficsor 2002, paras 2.38ff., C17-P26.01ff., and Reinbothe in Reinbothe and von Lewinski 2015, paras 7.17.1ff.
  10. ^ Article 3 Marrakesh Treaty.
  11. ^ Article 3(a) Marrakesh Treaty.
  12. ^ Helfer et al. 2017, p. 33. See e.g. the definition in the United States Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.  § 1382c(a)(2) (defining blindness as having "central visual acuity of 20/200 or less in the better eye with the use of a correcting lens").
  13. ^ Article 3(b) Marrakesh Treaty.
  14. ^ von Lewinski in Reinbothe and von Lewinski 2015, para 18.0.45; Auinger 2018, p. 385; Helfer et al. 2017, p. 34; Hilty et al. 2015, p. 710; Vezzoso 2014, p. 811. The example of dyslexia was expressly contained in Article B(b) of the draft presented by Argentina, Chile, the United States and others in the Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights in June 2011. "Consensus document on an international instrument on limitations and exceptions for persons with print disabilities (SCCR/22/15)" (PDF). WIPO. 20 June 2011. Retrieved 31 March 2019.
  15. ^ von Lewinski in Reinbothe and von Lewinski 2015, para 18.0.45. In the United Kingdom, such individuals are expressly excluded from the disability exceptions of the Copyright Act. Section 31F(3) CDPA 1988 (stating that "a person is not to be regarded as disabled by reason only of an impairment of visual function which can be improved, for example by the use of corrective lenses, to a level that is normally acceptable for reading without a special level or kind of light").
  16. ^ Ficsor 2013, p. 19; von Lewinski in Reinbothe and von Lewinski 2015, para 18.0.45.
  17. ^ Agreed statement concerning Article 3(b) Marrakesh Treaty.
  18. ^ Article 3(c) Marrakesh Treaty.
  19. ^ Viz., Vezzoso 2014, p. 811.
  20. ^ Viz., Helfer et al. 2017, p. 35.
  21. ^ This differs, for example, from the approach traditionally taken by the Australian lawmaker. See, Li and Selvadurai 2017, pp. 628f.
  22. ^ Article 2(a) Marrakesh Treaty. From the perspective of jurisdictions (such as Germany or Austria) that strictly differentiate between (immaterial) works and (material) copies of works, this definition, strictly speaking, refers to (particular types of) copies rather than works. See Auinger 2018, p. 386. For details of this distinction, see e.g. Ulmer 1980, p. 12; Schack 2017, paras 34ff.
  23. ^ See generally Ricketson and Ginsburg 2015, pp. 17ff.; Goldstein and Hugenholtz 2013, p. 4.
  24. ^ Trimble 2016, p. 772.
  25. ^ See, Ricketson and Ginsburg 2005, vol. 1, para. 8.06 ("The adjectives […] are not to be taken at their face value").
  26. ^ Article 2(1) Berne Convention.
  27. ^ von Lewinski in Reinbothe and von Lewinski 2015, para 18.0.35. See also, Vezzoso 2014, p. 813.

Works cited

  • Auinger, Christian (2018), "Vertrag von Marrakesch zur Erleichterung des Zugangs zu veröffentlichten Werken für blinde, sehbehinderte oder sonst lesebehinderte Personen", in Lewinski, Silke von; Wittmann, Heinz (eds.), Urheberrecht!: Festschrift für Hon.-Prof. Dr. Michel M. Walter zum 80. Geburtstag, Wien: Verlag Medien und Recht, pp. 383–394, ISBN  978-3-900741-74-7
  • Ayoubi, Lida (2015), "The Marrakesh Treaty: Fixing International Copyright Law for the Benefit of the Visually Impaired Persons", New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law, 13 (2): 255–276  – via  HeinOnline (subscription required)
  • Bannerman, Sara (2016), International Copyright and Access to Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN  978-1-107-02306-2
  • Blomqvist, Jørgen (2016), "Om fortolkning af Bernerkonventionen. Er Bernerkonventionen et maksimalistisk instrument?", in Karnell, Gunnar; Kur, Annette; Nordell, Per J.; et al. (eds.), Liber Amicorum Jan Rosén, Visby: eddy.se ab, pp. 153–167, ISBN  978-91-85333-66-0
  • Brown, Abbe; Waelde, Charlotte (2015), "Human rights, persons with disabilities and copyright", in Geiger, Christophe (ed.), Research Handbook on Human Rights and Intellectual Property, Cheltenham: Elgar, pp. 577–602, ISBN  978-1-78347-241-3
  • Conway, Danielle (2015), "The Miracle at Marrakesh: Doing Justice for the Blind and Visually Impaired While Changing the Culture of Norm Setting at WIPO", in Calboli, Irene; Ragavan, Srividhya (eds.), Diversity in Intellectual Property: Identities, Interests, and Intersections, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 35–57, ISBN  978-1-107-06552-9
  • Ficsor, Mihály (2002), The Law of Copyright and the Internet: The 1996 WIPO Treaties, their Interpretation and Implementation (1st ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN  0-19-829901-X
  • Ficsor, Mihály (2013), Commentary to the Marrakesh Treaty on Accessible Format Copies for the Visually Impaired (DOC), retrieved 2 April 2019
  • Goldstein, Paul; Hugenholtz, P. B. (2013), International Copyright: Principles, Law, and Practice (3rd ed.), New York: Oxford University Press, ISBN  978-0-19-979429-4
  • Harpur, Paul (2017), Discrimination, Copyright and Equality: Opening the e-Book for the Print-Disabled, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN  978-1-107-11900-0
  • Helfer, Laurence R.; Land, Molly K.; Okediji, Ruth L.; et al. (2017), The World Blind Union Guide to the Marrakesh Treaty: Facilitating Access to Books for Print-Disabled Individuals, Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN  978-0-19-067964-4
  • Hilty, Reto M.; Köklü, Kaya; Kur, Annette; et al. (2015), "Position Paper of the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition Concerning the Implementation of the WIPO Marrakesh Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works for Persons Who Are Blind, Visually Impaired or Otherwise Print Disabled", International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 46 (6): 707–716, doi: 10.1007/s40319-015-0381-5, S2CID  256374077
  • Kaminski, Margot E.; Yanisky-Ravid, Shlomit (2014), "The Marrakesh Treaty for Visually Impaired Persons: Why a Treaty Was Preferable to Soft Law", University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 75 (3): 255–300  – via  HeinOnline (subscription required)
  • Kongolo, Tshimanga (2012), "Towards an international legal instrument on exceptions and limitations to copyright for visually impaired persons/persons with print disabilities – current international negotiations", European Intellectual Property Review, 34 (12): 823–833
  • Lewinski, Silke von (2008), International Copyright Law and Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN  978-0-19-920720-6
  • Lewinski, Silke von (2010), "WIPO's discussions on exceptions and limitations, in particular in favour of visually impaired persons", Revue internationale du droit d'auteur, 225: 52–199
  • Lewinski, Silke von (2016), "The Marrakesh Treaty", in Stamatoudi, Irini (ed.), New Developments in EU and International Copyright Law, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer, pp. 123–141, ISBN  978-90-411-5991-5
  • Li, Jingyi (2014), "Copyright Exemptions to Facilitate Access to Published Works for the Print Disabled – The Gap Between National Laws and the Standards Required by the Marrakesh Treaty", International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 45 (7): 740–767, doi: 10.1007/s40319-014-0251-6, S2CID  256377268
  • Li, Jingyi; Selvadurai, Niloufer (2014), "Reconciling the enforcement of copyright with the upholding of human rights: a consideration of the Marrakesh Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works for the Blind, Visually Impaired and Print Disabled", European Intellectual Property Review, 36 (10): 653–664
  • Li, Jingyi; Selvadurai, Niloufer (2017), "Facilitating Access to Published Works for Persons with a Print Disability: Amending Australian Copyright Laws to Ensure Compliance with the Marrakesh Treaty", Monash University Law Review, 43 (3): 619–647  – via  HeinOnline (subscription required)
  • Olwan, Rami (2017), "The ratification and implementation of the Marrakesh Treaty for visually impaired persons in the Arab Gulf States", The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 20 (5–6): 178–205, doi: 10.1111/jwip.12088
  • Ramalho, Ana (2015), "Signed, Sealed, but Not Delivered: The EU and the Ratification of the Marrakesh Treaty", European Journal of Risk Regulation, 6 (4): 629–632, doi: 10.1017/S1867299X00005171, S2CID  155774352  – via  HeinOnline (subscription required)
  • Reinbothe, Jörg; Lewinski, Silke von (2015), The WIPO treaties on copyright: A commentary on the WCT, the WPPT and the BTAP (2nd ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN  978-0-19-968694-0
  • Ricketson, Sam; Ginsburg, Jane C. (2005), International Copyright and Neighbouring Rights: The Berne Convention and beyond, Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN  978-0-19-825946-6
  • Ricketson, Sam; Ginsburg, Jane C. (2015), "The Berne Convention: Historical and institutional aspects", in Gervais, Daniel J. (ed.), International Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research, Cheltenham: Elgar, pp. 3–36, ISBN  978-1-78254-479-1
  • Schack, Haimo (2017), Urheber- und Urhebervertragsrecht (8th ed.), Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, ISBN  978-3-16-155676-0
  • Scheinwald, Aaron (2012), ""Who Could Possibly be Against a Treaty for the Blind?"", Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal, 22 (2): 445–512  – via  HeinOnline (subscription required)
  • Seville, Catherine (2013), "The principles of international intellectual property protection: from Paris to Marrakesh", The WIPO Journal, 5 (1): 95–104
  • Trimble, Marketa (2016), "The Marrakesh Treaty and the targeted uses of copyright exhaustion", in Calboli, Irene; Lee, Edward (eds.), Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Parallel Imports, Cheltenham: Elgar, pp. 461–477, ISBN  978-1-78347-870-5
  • Ulmer, Eugen (1980), Urheber- und Verlagsrecht (3rd ed.), Berlin: Springer, ISBN  3-540-10367-8
  • Vezzoso, Simonetta (2014), "The Marrakesh spirit – a ghost in three steps?", International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 45 (7): 796–820, doi: 10.1007/s40319-014-0253-4, S2CID  256378958
  • Yap, Neil (2017), "Fitting Marrakesh into a Consequentialist Copyright Framework", New York University Journal of Intellectual Property and Entertainment Law, 6 (2): 351–382  – via  HeinOnline (subscription required)
  • Zemer, Lior; Gaon, Aviv (2015), "Copyright, disability and social inclusion: the Marrakesh Treaty and the role of non-signatories", Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 10 (11): 836–849, doi: 10.1093/jiplp/jpv149
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User:Pajz/marrakesh_draft&oldid=1167802556"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For other uses, see Marrakesh Treaty (disambiguation).
Marrakesh VIP Treaty
Marrakesh Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works for Persons Who Are Blind, Visually Impaired or Otherwise Print Disabled
TypeMultilateral
Signed28 June 2013 (2013-06-28)
Location Marrakesh, Morocco
Effective30 September 2016 (2016-09-30)
ConditionRatification of 20 parties
Signatories80 [1]
Parties48 (75 countries including EU's 28 member states) as of 19 March 2019 [2]
Depositary World Intellectual Property Organization
Countries that are party to the Marrakesh Treaty or that are bound by it as members of the European Union, as of 19 March 2019 [2]

The Marrakesh Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works for Persons Who Are Blind, Visually Impaired or Otherwise Print Disabled (also known as the Marrakesh VIP Treaty, occasionally abbreviated as MVT [3]) is a treaty in the area of copyright law adopted in Marrakesh, Morocco, on 27 June 2013. The treaty allows for copyright exceptions to facilitate the creation of accessible versions of books and other copyrighted works for visually impaired persons. It sets a norm for countries ratifying the treaty to have a domestic copyright exception covering these activities, and allowing for the import and export of such materials.

The Marrakesh Treaty entered into force on 30 September 2016, three months after the accession of the twentieth party.

Contents of the treaty

Eligible parties

The Marrakesh Treaty is open for ratification or accession to all of the—currently 191 (as of March 2019) [4]—member states of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). [5] Membership in other WIPO-administered treaties, such as the WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT), is not required. WIPO's General Assembly can also admit an intergovernmental organisation to the Marrakesh Treaty if the organisation was authorised to join the treaty by its members and can, in the areas covered by the treaty, enact legislation that is binding on all its members. [6] As a "concrete application of this general rule" [7], it is expressly stated that the European Union (EU), which issued a declaration at the Diplomatic Conference in Marrakesh confirming its compliance with these requirements, is entitled to join. [8]

These eligibility criteria are effectively the same as in other WIPO-administered copyright treaties. [9]

Basic structure and terminology

Beneficiary persons

As the Marrakesh Treaty's full name suggests, it is not intended to facilitate the wider public's access to works, but is specifically aimed at addressing the situation of blind (1), visually impaired (2) or otherwise print disabled (3) individuals. The Treaty collectively refers to them as "beneficiary persons". [10]

(1) While "blind" individuals are expressly mentioned, [11] the term "blind" is nowhere defined in the Marrakesh Treaty. It has been suggested that this allows countries to use existing, national definitions of blindness (which often do not require a total loss of visual acuity or visual field). [12] The need for an exact definition of "blind" in the Marrakesh Treaty is, however, lessened by the fact that the presence of a substantial visual impairment is sufficient to qualify for the benefits provided under the treaty (see next paragraph).

(2) Aside from the blind, the Marrakesh Treaty also benefits those who have "a visual impairment or a perceptual or reading disability which cannot be improved to give visual function substantially equivalent to that of a person who has no such impairment or disability and so is unable to read printed works to substantially the same degree as a person without an impairment or disability". [13] This clarifies that an individual's visual impairment does not need to rise to the level of blindness to justify protection under the Treaty. It also extends the group of beneficiaries to persons whose visual system is unimpaired but whose ability to read is instead constrained by a disability affecting the processing of visual information or its interpretation as language. According to commentators, this group of individuals includes, among others, people suffering from severe dyslexia. [14] As regards visual impairments, the provision does not extend to individuals whose normal vision can be restored through the use of glasses or lenses. [15] A challenge posed by this approach is that whether a given condition can be sufficiently improved is, in practice, highly dependant on the availability of treatment. While it may be objectively easy to mitigate the effects of a given visual impairment, the affected individual may live in an area of the world where the necessary medical services are not readily available, or where the cost of treatment is prohibitively high. Still, it is widely assumed that individuals, to qualify as beneficiaries, need to undergo certain diagnostic procedures and treatments, [16] while an agreed statement to the Marrakesh Treaty clarifies that it is not necessary to exhaust all possible medical diagnostic procedures and treatments. [17]

(3) Finally, the scope of beneficiaries includes persons that are "otherwise unable, through physical disability, to hold or manipulate a book or to focus or move the eyes to the extent that would be normally acceptable for reading". [18] In the literature, one commentator points to amputation, chronic arthritis, paraplegia and Parkinson's disease as examples of such a condition; [19] others mention quadriplegia, cerebral palsy, as well as motor-neuron and neurodegenerative diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). [20]

It is worth noting that the Marrakesh Treaty does not—unlike some national laws—stipulate different scopes of operation dependent on the nature of the beneficiary: All of the benefits it provides for are to be provided to all beneficiary persons. [21]

Works covered

The Marrakesh Treaty is concerned solely with "literary and artistic works" pursuant to the Berne Convention "in the form of text, notation and/or related illustrations". [22] It is common for treaties in the area of copyright law to build upon definitions from the (repeatedly revised) Berne Convention of 1886, which today is adhered to by almost all states of the world. [23] The limitation to copies "in the form of text, notation and/or related illustrations" was specifically developped for the Marrakesh Treaty and is novel to international copyright law. [24]

The term "literary and artistic works" is defined in Berne Article 2 as encompassing "every production in the literary, scientific and artistic domain". The definition is very broad, considerably broader than a common understanding of the adjectives "literary", "scientific" and "artistic" might suggest, [25] and extends, inter alia, to books, dramatic works, photographs, maps, drawings, paintings, sculptures, works of applied art, and three-dimensional scientific models. [26] However, due to the limitation to copies "in the form of text, notation and/or related illustrations", the set of qualifying material is effectively narrowed down. For instance, the use of Arthur Miller's Death of a Salesman is facilitated by Marrakesh provided that the specific copy concerned is a text edition of the work (and, therefore, constitutes a copy "in the form of text"), whereas a video recording of a performance of the same work would fall outside the scope of the Marrakesh Treaty. Similarly, the use of a musical composition is facilitated by Marrakesh if it is fixed in notation (say, in sheet music); the use of the same composition in the form of a sound recording, on the other hand, would not be governed by Marrakesh. [27]

Accessible format

Key provisions

Notes

  1. ^ "Marrakesh Treaty Assembly: First (1st Ordinary) Session: Status of the Marrakesh Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works for Persons Who Are Blind, Visually Impaired or Otherwise Print Disabled (MVT/A/1/2 Rev.)" (PDF). WIPO. 28 September 2016. pp. 1, 3. Retrieved 31 March 2019.
  2. ^ a b "Marrakesh Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works for Persons who are Blind, Visually Impaired or Otherwise Print Disabled (Marrakesh 2013): Status on March 19, 2019" (PDF). WIPO. Retrieved 31 March 2019.
  3. ^ See e.g. Zemer and Gaon 2015. The WIPO uses this acronym as well. "Summary of the Marrakesh Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works for Persons Who Are Blind, Visually Impaired, or Otherwise Print Disabled". WIPO. Retrieved 31 March 2019.
  4. ^ "Member States". WIPO. Retrieved 31 March 2019.
  5. ^ Article 15(1) Marrakesh Treaty.
  6. ^ Article 15(2) Marrakesh Treaty.
  7. ^ Ficsor 2002, para 2.39.
  8. ^ Article 15(3) Marrakesh Treaty.
  9. ^ Identical or essentially identical versions can be found in Article 17 WCT, Article 26 WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty (WPPT) and Article 23 Beijing Treaty on Audiovisual Performances. For the drafting history of this set of provisions in the context of the WCT, see Ficsor 2002, paras 2.38ff., C17-P26.01ff., and Reinbothe in Reinbothe and von Lewinski 2015, paras 7.17.1ff.
  10. ^ Article 3 Marrakesh Treaty.
  11. ^ Article 3(a) Marrakesh Treaty.
  12. ^ Helfer et al. 2017, p. 33. See e.g. the definition in the United States Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.  § 1382c(a)(2) (defining blindness as having "central visual acuity of 20/200 or less in the better eye with the use of a correcting lens").
  13. ^ Article 3(b) Marrakesh Treaty.
  14. ^ von Lewinski in Reinbothe and von Lewinski 2015, para 18.0.45; Auinger 2018, p. 385; Helfer et al. 2017, p. 34; Hilty et al. 2015, p. 710; Vezzoso 2014, p. 811. The example of dyslexia was expressly contained in Article B(b) of the draft presented by Argentina, Chile, the United States and others in the Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights in June 2011. "Consensus document on an international instrument on limitations and exceptions for persons with print disabilities (SCCR/22/15)" (PDF). WIPO. 20 June 2011. Retrieved 31 March 2019.
  15. ^ von Lewinski in Reinbothe and von Lewinski 2015, para 18.0.45. In the United Kingdom, such individuals are expressly excluded from the disability exceptions of the Copyright Act. Section 31F(3) CDPA 1988 (stating that "a person is not to be regarded as disabled by reason only of an impairment of visual function which can be improved, for example by the use of corrective lenses, to a level that is normally acceptable for reading without a special level or kind of light").
  16. ^ Ficsor 2013, p. 19; von Lewinski in Reinbothe and von Lewinski 2015, para 18.0.45.
  17. ^ Agreed statement concerning Article 3(b) Marrakesh Treaty.
  18. ^ Article 3(c) Marrakesh Treaty.
  19. ^ Viz., Vezzoso 2014, p. 811.
  20. ^ Viz., Helfer et al. 2017, p. 35.
  21. ^ This differs, for example, from the approach traditionally taken by the Australian lawmaker. See, Li and Selvadurai 2017, pp. 628f.
  22. ^ Article 2(a) Marrakesh Treaty. From the perspective of jurisdictions (such as Germany or Austria) that strictly differentiate between (immaterial) works and (material) copies of works, this definition, strictly speaking, refers to (particular types of) copies rather than works. See Auinger 2018, p. 386. For details of this distinction, see e.g. Ulmer 1980, p. 12; Schack 2017, paras 34ff.
  23. ^ See generally Ricketson and Ginsburg 2015, pp. 17ff.; Goldstein and Hugenholtz 2013, p. 4.
  24. ^ Trimble 2016, p. 772.
  25. ^ See, Ricketson and Ginsburg 2005, vol. 1, para. 8.06 ("The adjectives […] are not to be taken at their face value").
  26. ^ Article 2(1) Berne Convention.
  27. ^ von Lewinski in Reinbothe and von Lewinski 2015, para 18.0.35. See also, Vezzoso 2014, p. 813.

Works cited

  • Auinger, Christian (2018), "Vertrag von Marrakesch zur Erleichterung des Zugangs zu veröffentlichten Werken für blinde, sehbehinderte oder sonst lesebehinderte Personen", in Lewinski, Silke von; Wittmann, Heinz (eds.), Urheberrecht!: Festschrift für Hon.-Prof. Dr. Michel M. Walter zum 80. Geburtstag, Wien: Verlag Medien und Recht, pp. 383–394, ISBN  978-3-900741-74-7
  • Ayoubi, Lida (2015), "The Marrakesh Treaty: Fixing International Copyright Law for the Benefit of the Visually Impaired Persons", New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law, 13 (2): 255–276  – via  HeinOnline (subscription required)
  • Bannerman, Sara (2016), International Copyright and Access to Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN  978-1-107-02306-2
  • Blomqvist, Jørgen (2016), "Om fortolkning af Bernerkonventionen. Er Bernerkonventionen et maksimalistisk instrument?", in Karnell, Gunnar; Kur, Annette; Nordell, Per J.; et al. (eds.), Liber Amicorum Jan Rosén, Visby: eddy.se ab, pp. 153–167, ISBN  978-91-85333-66-0
  • Brown, Abbe; Waelde, Charlotte (2015), "Human rights, persons with disabilities and copyright", in Geiger, Christophe (ed.), Research Handbook on Human Rights and Intellectual Property, Cheltenham: Elgar, pp. 577–602, ISBN  978-1-78347-241-3
  • Conway, Danielle (2015), "The Miracle at Marrakesh: Doing Justice for the Blind and Visually Impaired While Changing the Culture of Norm Setting at WIPO", in Calboli, Irene; Ragavan, Srividhya (eds.), Diversity in Intellectual Property: Identities, Interests, and Intersections, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 35–57, ISBN  978-1-107-06552-9
  • Ficsor, Mihály (2002), The Law of Copyright and the Internet: The 1996 WIPO Treaties, their Interpretation and Implementation (1st ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN  0-19-829901-X
  • Ficsor, Mihály (2013), Commentary to the Marrakesh Treaty on Accessible Format Copies for the Visually Impaired (DOC), retrieved 2 April 2019
  • Goldstein, Paul; Hugenholtz, P. B. (2013), International Copyright: Principles, Law, and Practice (3rd ed.), New York: Oxford University Press, ISBN  978-0-19-979429-4
  • Harpur, Paul (2017), Discrimination, Copyright and Equality: Opening the e-Book for the Print-Disabled, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN  978-1-107-11900-0
  • Helfer, Laurence R.; Land, Molly K.; Okediji, Ruth L.; et al. (2017), The World Blind Union Guide to the Marrakesh Treaty: Facilitating Access to Books for Print-Disabled Individuals, Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN  978-0-19-067964-4
  • Hilty, Reto M.; Köklü, Kaya; Kur, Annette; et al. (2015), "Position Paper of the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition Concerning the Implementation of the WIPO Marrakesh Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works for Persons Who Are Blind, Visually Impaired or Otherwise Print Disabled", International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 46 (6): 707–716, doi: 10.1007/s40319-015-0381-5, S2CID  256374077
  • Kaminski, Margot E.; Yanisky-Ravid, Shlomit (2014), "The Marrakesh Treaty for Visually Impaired Persons: Why a Treaty Was Preferable to Soft Law", University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 75 (3): 255–300  – via  HeinOnline (subscription required)
  • Kongolo, Tshimanga (2012), "Towards an international legal instrument on exceptions and limitations to copyright for visually impaired persons/persons with print disabilities – current international negotiations", European Intellectual Property Review, 34 (12): 823–833
  • Lewinski, Silke von (2008), International Copyright Law and Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN  978-0-19-920720-6
  • Lewinski, Silke von (2010), "WIPO's discussions on exceptions and limitations, in particular in favour of visually impaired persons", Revue internationale du droit d'auteur, 225: 52–199
  • Lewinski, Silke von (2016), "The Marrakesh Treaty", in Stamatoudi, Irini (ed.), New Developments in EU and International Copyright Law, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer, pp. 123–141, ISBN  978-90-411-5991-5
  • Li, Jingyi (2014), "Copyright Exemptions to Facilitate Access to Published Works for the Print Disabled – The Gap Between National Laws and the Standards Required by the Marrakesh Treaty", International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 45 (7): 740–767, doi: 10.1007/s40319-014-0251-6, S2CID  256377268
  • Li, Jingyi; Selvadurai, Niloufer (2014), "Reconciling the enforcement of copyright with the upholding of human rights: a consideration of the Marrakesh Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works for the Blind, Visually Impaired and Print Disabled", European Intellectual Property Review, 36 (10): 653–664
  • Li, Jingyi; Selvadurai, Niloufer (2017), "Facilitating Access to Published Works for Persons with a Print Disability: Amending Australian Copyright Laws to Ensure Compliance with the Marrakesh Treaty", Monash University Law Review, 43 (3): 619–647  – via  HeinOnline (subscription required)
  • Olwan, Rami (2017), "The ratification and implementation of the Marrakesh Treaty for visually impaired persons in the Arab Gulf States", The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 20 (5–6): 178–205, doi: 10.1111/jwip.12088
  • Ramalho, Ana (2015), "Signed, Sealed, but Not Delivered: The EU and the Ratification of the Marrakesh Treaty", European Journal of Risk Regulation, 6 (4): 629–632, doi: 10.1017/S1867299X00005171, S2CID  155774352  – via  HeinOnline (subscription required)
  • Reinbothe, Jörg; Lewinski, Silke von (2015), The WIPO treaties on copyright: A commentary on the WCT, the WPPT and the BTAP (2nd ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN  978-0-19-968694-0
  • Ricketson, Sam; Ginsburg, Jane C. (2005), International Copyright and Neighbouring Rights: The Berne Convention and beyond, Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN  978-0-19-825946-6
  • Ricketson, Sam; Ginsburg, Jane C. (2015), "The Berne Convention: Historical and institutional aspects", in Gervais, Daniel J. (ed.), International Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research, Cheltenham: Elgar, pp. 3–36, ISBN  978-1-78254-479-1
  • Schack, Haimo (2017), Urheber- und Urhebervertragsrecht (8th ed.), Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, ISBN  978-3-16-155676-0
  • Scheinwald, Aaron (2012), ""Who Could Possibly be Against a Treaty for the Blind?"", Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal, 22 (2): 445–512  – via  HeinOnline (subscription required)
  • Seville, Catherine (2013), "The principles of international intellectual property protection: from Paris to Marrakesh", The WIPO Journal, 5 (1): 95–104
  • Trimble, Marketa (2016), "The Marrakesh Treaty and the targeted uses of copyright exhaustion", in Calboli, Irene; Lee, Edward (eds.), Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Parallel Imports, Cheltenham: Elgar, pp. 461–477, ISBN  978-1-78347-870-5
  • Ulmer, Eugen (1980), Urheber- und Verlagsrecht (3rd ed.), Berlin: Springer, ISBN  3-540-10367-8
  • Vezzoso, Simonetta (2014), "The Marrakesh spirit – a ghost in three steps?", International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 45 (7): 796–820, doi: 10.1007/s40319-014-0253-4, S2CID  256378958
  • Yap, Neil (2017), "Fitting Marrakesh into a Consequentialist Copyright Framework", New York University Journal of Intellectual Property and Entertainment Law, 6 (2): 351–382  – via  HeinOnline (subscription required)
  • Zemer, Lior; Gaon, Aviv (2015), "Copyright, disability and social inclusion: the Marrakesh Treaty and the role of non-signatories", Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 10 (11): 836–849, doi: 10.1093/jiplp/jpv149
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User:Pajz/marrakesh_draft&oldid=1167802556"

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook




Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE