This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.
Guiding questions:
Good and concise - I would recommend maybe not starting every sentence the same way with "The Manus Plate"; maybe use "it" instead to sound less repetitive. Some of the sentences could also probably be combined to make them sound a bit more developed but still concise.
Guiding questions:
All content is relevant and up to date.
Guiding questions:
Content is unbiased and factual.
Guiding questions:
Good addition of sources; article still needs a reference section with links.
Guiding questions:
Good separation into topic sections - remember to add a Reference section.
Under the Formation section, I got what you mean by "in-between", but not totally sure what you meant by "on top of" transform boundaries.
Watch your comma usage; some are unnecessary - I would maybe copy your sentences into Microsoft word and enable the grammar edits to find where you can make some corrections and then change those spots in your article.
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media
Maybe include some images if possible.
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Guiding questions:
Good expansion to what was already on Wikipedia. Never hurts to add more info if possible and if there is any more available that's relevant. Also, instead of the traditional in-text citation format, include links to the sources - I think there's an exercise explaining how to do this on the Wikipedia course training page.
Nice work!
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.
Guiding questions:
Good and concise - I would recommend maybe not starting every sentence the same way with "The Manus Plate"; maybe use "it" instead to sound less repetitive. Some of the sentences could also probably be combined to make them sound a bit more developed but still concise.
Guiding questions:
All content is relevant and up to date.
Guiding questions:
Content is unbiased and factual.
Guiding questions:
Good addition of sources; article still needs a reference section with links.
Guiding questions:
Good separation into topic sections - remember to add a Reference section.
Under the Formation section, I got what you mean by "in-between", but not totally sure what you meant by "on top of" transform boundaries.
Watch your comma usage; some are unnecessary - I would maybe copy your sentences into Microsoft word and enable the grammar edits to find where you can make some corrections and then change those spots in your article.
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media
Maybe include some images if possible.
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Guiding questions:
Good expansion to what was already on Wikipedia. Never hurts to add more info if possible and if there is any more available that's relevant. Also, instead of the traditional in-text citation format, include links to the sources - I think there's an exercise explaining how to do this on the Wikipedia course training page.
Nice work!