![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional ResourcesCheck out the Editing Wikipedia PDF for general editing tips and suggestions. |
NotAPickle0 and Behatted
- The lead gives a nice overview of the information in the article. I think the first sentence is unnecessary, and the lead would be a good place to list the main subsections of the article.
- Some of the sections only have links to a different article or a one-line sentence stating a different application of artificial intelligence. Since there are many small sections, I think these topics could be combined into one overarching section. Adding more detail about each application that currently has only a line of information would also enhance this article.
- There are many good sources.
- It seems like the majority of the sections talk about the advantages and benefits of artificial intelligence. It would add credibility to this article if there was a section about the disadvantages or negative-uses of artificial intelligence.
![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional ResourcesCheck out the Editing Wikipedia PDF for general editing tips and suggestions. |
NotAPickle0 and Behatted
- The lead gives a nice overview of the information in the article. I think the first sentence is unnecessary, and the lead would be a good place to list the main subsections of the article.
- Some of the sections only have links to a different article or a one-line sentence stating a different application of artificial intelligence. Since there are many small sections, I think these topics could be combined into one overarching section. Adding more detail about each application that currently has only a line of information would also enhance this article.
- There are many good sources.
- It seems like the majority of the sections talk about the advantages and benefits of artificial intelligence. It would add credibility to this article if there was a section about the disadvantages or negative-uses of artificial intelligence.