NOITALL IS SLOWING DOWN HIS CONTRIBUTIONS DUE TO VANDALS WHO INSIST ON DESTROYING WIKI
Noitall gets paid (not a lot) for knowing Maryland politics of both parties. Noitall has many reliable sources, which get double and triple checked.
Apologies (should) work - If an editor is half intelligent and somewhat opinionated, they are bound to find themselves in an "edit war." When an apology is given or an error admitted, accept it with grace and move on.
(or those contributions that the evil "reverters" have not erased)
I think it significant, of course, if I wrote most of the article. I also believe it significant if I added new ideas, improved the idea, or made the article more neutral.
No, this isn't to bury editors whom I dislike, it is to categorize and note who is buried where, using Category:Cemeteries by country and creating the "Burials at" series of categories.
Created the new Category:Lost cities and towns to document lost cities.
This is encyclopedic and decent enough for Wiki:
Totally POV source at Hillary Clinton and unjustified conclusion (with some further conclusions on the source):
And that was supposedly a pro-Hillary source! Then another editor labeled properly: "Hi. I looked this reference up. It is not a "psychological study", it is an informal book by a psychiatrist. It's not peer reviewed. Judging by the online content it does not belong here" Well, the "source" was really really funny while it lasted.
To paraphrase Abraham Lincoln, "It may seem strange that any men should dare to ask a just God's assistance in a suicide bomb attack against harmless civilians, women and children, but that is the state of Islamist terrorism."
This category is for candidates for political office who have been endorsed by a major newspaper despite qualities or lack of qualities normally required for public office. This is not to record political disputes of views, but where an objective organization has determined that a person has a serious deficiency, yet a major newspaper endorses said candidate despite these deficiencies. For instance, a typical candidate may have been recently or repeatedly disbarred by a court for serious breaches of ethics and competence, yet the regional newspaper endorses this candidate for public office.
The Bible and history -- Galileo views of science & history
Terrorism definition
Slavery
[5]
Taney statue Mount Vernon [6]
Annapolis, sculptor William Henry Rinehart [http://www.famousamericans.net/williamhenryrinehart/]
NOITALL IS SLOWING DOWN HIS CONTRIBUTIONS DUE TO VANDALS WHO INSIST ON DESTROYING WIKI
Noitall gets paid (not a lot) for knowing Maryland politics of both parties. Noitall has many reliable sources, which get double and triple checked.
Apologies (should) work - If an editor is half intelligent and somewhat opinionated, they are bound to find themselves in an "edit war." When an apology is given or an error admitted, accept it with grace and move on.
(or those contributions that the evil "reverters" have not erased)
I think it significant, of course, if I wrote most of the article. I also believe it significant if I added new ideas, improved the idea, or made the article more neutral.
No, this isn't to bury editors whom I dislike, it is to categorize and note who is buried where, using Category:Cemeteries by country and creating the "Burials at" series of categories.
Created the new Category:Lost cities and towns to document lost cities.
This is encyclopedic and decent enough for Wiki:
Totally POV source at Hillary Clinton and unjustified conclusion (with some further conclusions on the source):
And that was supposedly a pro-Hillary source! Then another editor labeled properly: "Hi. I looked this reference up. It is not a "psychological study", it is an informal book by a psychiatrist. It's not peer reviewed. Judging by the online content it does not belong here" Well, the "source" was really really funny while it lasted.
To paraphrase Abraham Lincoln, "It may seem strange that any men should dare to ask a just God's assistance in a suicide bomb attack against harmless civilians, women and children, but that is the state of Islamist terrorism."
This category is for candidates for political office who have been endorsed by a major newspaper despite qualities or lack of qualities normally required for public office. This is not to record political disputes of views, but where an objective organization has determined that a person has a serious deficiency, yet a major newspaper endorses said candidate despite these deficiencies. For instance, a typical candidate may have been recently or repeatedly disbarred by a court for serious breaches of ethics and competence, yet the regional newspaper endorses this candidate for public office.
The Bible and history -- Galileo views of science & history
Terrorism definition
Slavery
[5]
Taney statue Mount Vernon [6]
Annapolis, sculptor William Henry Rinehart [http://www.famousamericans.net/williamhenryrinehart/]