This is a log of all
proposed deletion tags applied or endorsed by this user using
Twinkle's PROD module. Note: I wasn't aware that Twinkle could automatically log PROD and CSD nominations until May 2014.
If you no longer wish to keep this log, you can turn it off using the
preferences panel, and nominate this page for speedy deletion under
CSD U1.
Reason: Tagged for notability since 2011, and no indication thereof; even if notability can be shown, the article has a history consisting wholly of unencyclopedic content that
WP:TNT can apply
Reason: Fails
Wikipedia:Notability (films). Critics appear to have ignored the film, as reliable sources which discuss the film can't be found. Possible
WP:TNT, as the article would need a fundamental rewrite to become encyclopedic. Everything remotely encyclopedic is already stated at
Barbarian Queen.
Reason: Does not appear to be a
notable political party. All references are to primary sources and very little secondary source coverage can be found online.
Reason: Sources are mostly primary/non-independent sources that don't indicate notability under
WP:GNG or
WP:BASIC. The subject is certainly not notable for his domestic violence per
WP:CRIME.
Reason: The band's article was
recently deleted at AfD for lack of notability. This article describes one of the band's works, which does not appear to be notable.
Reason: After review, I agree this is a possible hoax. At the very least, it does not appear to be a notable topic; no reliable sources discuss it, and neither of the sources even mention it.
This is a log of all
proposed deletion tags applied or endorsed by this user using
Twinkle's PROD module. Note: I wasn't aware that Twinkle could automatically log PROD and CSD nominations until May 2014.
If you no longer wish to keep this log, you can turn it off using the
preferences panel, and nominate this page for speedy deletion under
CSD U1.
Reason: Tagged for notability since 2011, and no indication thereof; even if notability can be shown, the article has a history consisting wholly of unencyclopedic content that
WP:TNT can apply
Reason: Fails
Wikipedia:Notability (films). Critics appear to have ignored the film, as reliable sources which discuss the film can't be found. Possible
WP:TNT, as the article would need a fundamental rewrite to become encyclopedic. Everything remotely encyclopedic is already stated at
Barbarian Queen.
Reason: Does not appear to be a
notable political party. All references are to primary sources and very little secondary source coverage can be found online.
Reason: Sources are mostly primary/non-independent sources that don't indicate notability under
WP:GNG or
WP:BASIC. The subject is certainly not notable for his domestic violence per
WP:CRIME.
Reason: The band's article was
recently deleted at AfD for lack of notability. This article describes one of the band's works, which does not appear to be notable.
Reason: After review, I agree this is a possible hoax. At the very least, it does not appear to be a notable topic; no reliable sources discuss it, and neither of the sources even mention it.