This is a log of all deletion discussion nominations made by this user using Twinkle's XfD module.

If you no longer wish to keep this log, you can turn it off using the preferences panel, and nominate this page for speedy deletion under CSD U1.

September 2020

1. Bibliography of Tirana nominated at AfD; notified Iaof2017 ( talk · contribs) 11:55, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Though the article claims to be a list, it constitutes a violation of WP:NOTBIBLIOGRAPHY. Since most entries in the article contain external links, it also violates WP:LINKFARM, which states that Wikipedia must not host link repositories.
2. Becky Prim nominated at AfD; notified TemplatePeterBaldwin ( talk · contribs) 22:55, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: I PRODDED the article because it is a clear WP:GNG fail. The one source provided is a self-published YouTube video. A Google search reveals a lots of coverage on the subject, but none in reliable sources. It also does not meet WP:NFO. The creator has challenged a PROD but I am yet to see any evidence to demonstrate that this film merits inclusion.
3. SCP - Secret Laboratory nominated at AfD; notified Aevann ( talk · contribs) 12:24, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: The article does not have any sources. I've done a google check, and there is some coverage of the game on YouTube and Steam. Nothing by way of reliable, independent sources and therefore WP:GNG fail.
4. Brian Hull (impressionist) nominated at AfD; notified WikiTimmy ( talk · contribs) 17:59, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: I was about to move the article to draft but I believe it should be deleted instead. The one source provided is the subject YouTube channel. Generally, the subject appears to be simply a YouTuber with a large number of subscribers. A Google search turns up lots of self-published sources but not much by way of reliable sources. This is why I think the article fails WP:GNG, WP:BASIC and WP:ENTERTAINER.
5. Seidai Myōjin nominated at AfD; notified CycoMa ( talk · contribs) 11:18, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: The source provided is to a non-reliable website. During my WP:BEFORE, I found a couple of additional sources on the subject: this from Reuters and this from Discover Kyoto. While these are reliable sources, Seidai Myōjin is only mentioned in passing. In general, it appears that he is only ever mentioned in conjunction with the shrine mentioned in the sources. These mentions are not WP:SIGCOV.

October 2020

1. Poju Oyemade nominated at AfD; notified Godstime Elijah ( talk · contribs) 23:28, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: This person seems to be well-known but not notable as defined by WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. The article has four sources: three of them ( [1], [2], [3]) are not independent of the subject because they regurgitate his views. The other one ( [4]) comes up blank. Googling turns up numerous results but I have not been able to find coverage that doesn't just paraphrase some statement of his.
2. Jean-Pierre Barou nominated at AfD; notified Brxdxe ( talk · contribs) 23:01, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: This individual seems to be fairly well-known as a writer and for having worked with Jean-Paul Sartre, Michel Foucault and other intellectuals. Still, the sources in the article do not demonstrate his own notability: This one was written by the subject himself and does nothing to show he's notable. This tells us much about the newspaper but nothing about the man. This is just a catalogue entry about a book. There are many, seemingly self-published sources about this person. What I would like to see is clearly reliable and independent evidence that he meets WP:GNG or WP:AUTHOR. If he truly is an eminent figure in publishing, there would be a good deal of reliable coverage on him.

November 2020

1. SoulPage IT Solutions nominated at AfD; notified StoryInk ( talk · contribs) 12:35, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: The sources provided at the bottom of the article are mere listings and do not constitute WP:SIGCOV. I've found another article with somewhat more coverage ( this) but I'm not sure this is sigcov either. Having done a search, some other articles with brief mentions are available. Overall, I believe WP:GNG and WP:COMPANY is not met.
2. Okeano nominated at AfD; notified Pisatel88 ( talk · contribs) 19:05, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: The article is sourced only from the company's own website. A search does not reveal any independent coverage, significant or otherwise. What keeps this article from being straightforwardly promotional is that it doesn't reek of the normal puff language, though NPOV is still not adhered to. Overall, the source situation makes it a WP:GNG and WP:NWEB fail.
3. Member.buzz nominated at AfD; notified Madisonyeack ( talk · contribs) 22:22, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: The article is sourced from a selection of non-independent sources. The one reliable source is the WFMJ-TV article, though it reads like a PR piece. Lots of non-third-party sources can be found via Google but I haven't seen anything that would indicate that the subject meets WP:GNG or WP:CORP.
4. Corey James La Barrie nominated at AfD; notified Jessebyrant ( talk · contribs) 23:02, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Although some reliable sources are provided, I believe this subject is only famous for WP:ONEEVENT. The sources all focus on his death and it is doubtful whether he would have been notable before. In fact, a recent AfD resolved to delete the article of the somewhat prominent Brian Hull who has more than 2 Million subscribers. This subject had 300,000. Since Wikipedia is WP:NOTNEWS, this article should be deleted.
5. James Yarkot nominated at AfD; notified Yomeo ( talk · contribs) 11:59, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: The article does not have any sources and a WP:BEFORE search did not reveal anything other than self-published content. The creator has expressed that he wants to expand the article but there is nothing to suggest the subject is notable. While this might actually be PROD/BLPROD territory, I thought I'd take the article to AfD because the creator would likely object/add a source.
6. E.B. Allen nominated at AfD; notified Vkdvdsn ( talk · contribs) 21:23, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Of the sources provided in the article only one is potentially reliable. It consists of an interview with the subject conducted by his granddaughter. Not having found any sources that would establish notability, I would say this is a WP:GNG fail. Now, does his appearance in Harlan County, USA make him notable? WP:NACTOR calls for roles in multiple notable films. Since he has not appeared in more than one film, he is not notable by that standard either.

December 2020

1. Margaret Keenan (Covid 19 Vaccine) nominated at AfD; notified Tabletop123 ( talk · contribs) 22:18, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: The subject is only known for being the first person to receive the vaccine. Otherwise, her life was unremarkable. A clear case of WP:ONEEVENT. A redirect could be left to e.g. COVID-19 vaccine. It is unlikely she will become separately notable in the future.
2. Vanguards Die-cast nominated at AfD; notified Yyg850c ( talk · contribs) 22:05, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: The article reads like a poorly sourced promotional piece. The sources used are mostly from niche sites or simply from the parent company's website. Regardless of whether this iteration of the article is promotional, I thought I'd take this to AfD to better prevent re-creation in the future. I could not find any RIS on Vanguards Die-cast. A redirect to Corgi Toys or Hornby Railways might work as well.
3. Arif Ahmed (philosopher) nominated at AfD; notified Magnovvig ( talk · contribs) 00:49, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: The article, sourced mainly from Varsity, Cambridge University's student run newspaper, presents Ahmed's involvement about the freedom of speech debate at his institution. Since coverage of only one event, here in a better source by The Times, does not automatically lead to notability ( WP:E1), I checked whether he met WP:NACADEMIC. Currently, I think his academic record does not meet this guideline. He might well become notable in the future, e.g. by being elected to a named chair. For the time being, it's just his intervention in the freedom of speech debate.
4. Ghazi Bismillah khan nominated at AfD; notified Asadullah333 ( talk · contribs) 22:49, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Unsourced recreation of an article previously deleted under A7. I don't know how the article looked back then, but there is nothing now to suggest the subject is notable. I have not found any sources either.
5. The Bell Twins: nominated at AfD; notified Ripmamba824 ( talk · contribs) 12:21, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: The subjects are known for their involvement in the recent Safety (2020 film). The sources used in the article are all interviews and the article a collection of miscellaneous trivia taken from the subject's answers. I haven't found anything independent. Apart from GNG, they fail WP:NACTOR, which calls for signifcant roles in multiple notable production. Perhaps, a redirect to Safety might be in order until they become notable in their own right.
6. Joanne Jonas: nominated at AfD; notified Broadwaygirl918 ( talk · contribs) 17:02, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Apart from an IMDb profile, the article does not cite any sources. I have found not any reliable sources during a WP:BEFORE search. ( This unreliable blog post contains some information about her.) Looking at WP:NACTOR, none of the criteria are met since Godspell (film) seems to have been her only larger role in a notable production.
7. Zohar Liba: nominated at AfD; notified Kayman2016 ( talk · contribs) 12:01, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: The article's only sources are an unreliable move site and an IMBd profile. Having failed to find significant coverage of him in RIS, he would have to meet WP:NACTOR to be notable. I believe he meets none of the criteria, since he does not seem to have had any significant roles. In the recent El Cid (TV series), his role is small enough to warrant only trivial mentions in Spanish news coverage.
8. Achraf Gharib: nominated at AfD; notified Waccasa ( talk · contribs) 12:10, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: The subject has not made an appearance for either Malaga nor his current club, who play in the semi-professional Botola 2. Hence, he fails WP:NFOOTBALL's requirement to have played a full professional match.
9. Phrygianics: nominated at AfD; notified George5454 ( talk · contribs) 15:13, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
   • Reason: Unsourced article about a Jazz album. I have not found the coverage needed in a WP:BEFORE search. Though lots about the album turn up on Google, it does not seem to meet any of the criteria of WP:NALBUM. I have found this article about the artist, but the album does not appear to be independently notable. Since notability is not inherited, this should be deleted.
10. Akash mahmud: nominated at AfD; notified Sky.mahmud.official ( talk · contribs) 13:13, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
    • Reason: The article barely presents a claim of importance. Narrowly avoiding A7, I believe this should be deleted for failing WP:GNG and WP:NSINGER. The current sources are only google entries or self published sites. I could not find anything reliable either.

January 2021

1. Dettra Flag Company: nominated at AfD; notified BlinxTheKitty ( talk · contribs) 19:36, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Two or more reliable and independent sources are required per WP:COMPANY/ WP:GNG. Only one of the sources in the article comes close to being useful: this story from the Historical Society of Montgomery County, PA. I'm not sure if the website is reliable and I have not found any substantial coverage in solid sources myself. I believe WP:GNG/WP:COMPANY are not met.
2. Jennifer Hansen: nominated at AfD; notified RTID ( talk · contribs) 18:03, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: The article used to be rather shoddy, but it's been improved and a PROD declined. But, even now, I still believe that the subject falls short of GNG. The following sources are used in the article and none of them are independent or constitute sigcov: her personal website, an interview, a 2006 press release about her leaving an employer, a more detailed release about her joining a new firm, the website of her radio show and a story about her husband. A WP:BEFORE search lets me think that the editors already got the most out of these sources. I understand that she must be fairly well-known, but I don't believe WP:JOURNALIST is met either.
3. Zack Ruhl: nominated at AfD; notified Abhijeet Safai ( talk · contribs) 11:16, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: The article comes with several sources, some of them in reliable publications. They fail to convince me that the subject is notable for more than a single thing: a fitness trainer whose legs have been amputated. Apart from potentially falling foul of WP:1E, I think this article also verges on WP:MILL since there will be many people with a story very similar to the subject's who received coverage.
4. Hey Dude (company): nominated at AfD; notified Goodreg3 ( talk · contribs) 21:54, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: The sources used are all from a UK retailer. After a WP:BEFORE search, I believe there is no indecent and reliable coverage to suggest that this company is notable. WP:GNG and WP:NCOMPANY are not met.
5. Cryptonews: nominated at AfD; notified Topjur01 ( talk · contribs) 22:01, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: This article is an assortment of non-independent social media content and info about the company's editorship. I have not been able to locate any significant coverage, much less in reliable sources. WP:GNG and WP:NCOMPANY are not met.
6. The Graduate Network: nominated at AfD; notified Cambridgehistory ( talk · contribs) 18:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: The three references provided do not meet the bar for WP:GNG/ WP:NCOMPANY. They are: the company's website, a student newspaper and the last one is not sigcov. A WP:BEFORE search did not reveal any reliable sources. There is a Canadian organisation called "National Black Graduate Network", on which there is coverage, but they are a different company. Looking at the creator's talk page, there seems to be a case of undisclosed COI/promo editing ongoing.
7. Ruby Granger: nominated at AfD; notified Bursubba ( talk · contribs) 16:13, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: The article is based on the subject's personal website and a re-hash of one of her videos. I can find no indication that reliable coverage exists on her. There is this article from the unreliabel news provider The Tab. The article, a copy paste job from one of it's sources, could be speedily deleted under G12 but I though I'd take this to AfD over the subject's falling short of WP:GNG/ WP:ENTERTAINER
8. Virginia Young Democrats Teen Caucus: nominated at AfD; notified Super Virginian ( talk · contribs) 11:05, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Tp meet WP:NORG/ WP:GNG organisations need coverage in two or more reliable and indecent sources. This article is based on three sources by the Democratic Party. A google search brings up more partisan sources but I have not yet found anything independent in a serious publication. Since a clubs aren't inherently notable (particularly not those with 400 members), the article should be deleted.

February 2021

1. Hashem Ghaffari: nominated at AfD; notified Sasanpajoh ( talk · contribs) 17:25, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: The sources for this article are all self-published or do not refer to the subject in detail. His IMDb page suggests that the subject is known for being the son of a martyr, which, of course, does not confer notability. Since I have not been able to find any reliable coverage of his music- or acting-related activities, I think the article should be deleted for failure of WP:GNG and WP:SINGER.
2. Ted Staunton: nominated at AfD; notified Tomacpace ( talk · contribs) 10:52, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Some years ago, a page of this name was deleted via an AfD (see [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted Staunton|here). The reasons for deletion were that no reliable/independent sources were used in the article; instead said article filled its reference section with Good Reads and the like. The new article, though not a copy, has the same problems: it does not use reliable sources to cover this person's life and the source situation has changed only slightly since the last time around. Yes, he has written lots of books but they don't seem to have the number of reliable reviews asked for in WP:AUTHOR. Regarding WP:ANYBIO, I don't think the John Spray Mystery Award is sufficient to make its recipients notable by default.
3. Chucklewood Critters: nominated at AfD; notified Carlos88combo ( talk · contribs) 22:18, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: This TV show was recently soft deleted and is not G4 eligible. The article, a list of characters, cites no sources whatsoever. IMDb tells me that the show ran for two years in the 90s but I've found no evidence of reliable sources engaging with it. So, I think the original deletion reason is still valid ( WP:GNG and WP:NMEDIA ).
4. Skye Rider: nominated at AfD; notified Zara2814 ( talk · contribs) 21:39, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: The sources given are Google Lyrics and an interview with the subject. Given that he has released just one single with a record label, it's not surprising there isn't much coverage on him. Perhaps he'll be notable one day, bur for now the subject fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO
5. Beyond Valkyrie: Dawn of the 4th Reich: nominated at AfD; notified Pete Maverick ( talk · contribs) 21:18, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: This article about a film is built on IMDb references. While searching for sources, I have found this piece by IndieWire and a review by a blog called "The War Movie Buff". These are not enough to meet the two professional reviews asked for by WP:NFO. So, I'd say the article should be deleted for failing WP:GNG and WP:NFILM.
6. Science and Religion (book): nominated at AfD; notified Rishabh.rsd ( talk · contribs) 11:05, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: The article has a link to the book as its only source. I've found it hard to find secondary coverage online. If one searches for the book's name together with its author's, some results appear though apparently nothing that would amount to significant coverage. So, the book doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:NBOOK.
7. Leonides of Elis: nominated at AfD; notified Digitalphilologist ( talk · contribs) 11:01, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: This stub is based on one passage in Athenaeus' Deipnosophistae, a primary source. The two standard works (New Pauly and Oxford Classical Dictionary) don't have entries on this subject. Of course, Wikipedia is not a paper book but we're also not a directory of people mentioned in classical literature. I have not found significant secondary coverage, so WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO are not met.

March 2021

1. Radio AmchiKONKANI: nominated at AfD; notified Godwin Castelino ( talk · contribs) 22:07, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: The article is built on three sources: a Wikipedia article, a blog post of sort and a short piece from a non-independent source. I have found nothing that comes close to independent secondary coverage; a Google search gives you lots of places to listen to this station but not much else. Note, also, that the creator appears to have a conflict of interest.
2. Ranjeet Jha: nominated at AfD; notified Infohowl ( talk · contribs) 15:36, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: The sources presented are inadequate and the film roles provided are not enough to meet WP:NACTOR. I have found no substantial coverage that would make the subject pass WP:GNG.

April 2021

1. Zenetic Esports: nominated at AfD; notified JuarezIsAsleepOrDead ( talk · contribs) 21:49, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: This article is on a company that does not seem to meet WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. The sources used certainly don't point to the contrary. I have not found sufficiently reliable coverage on a WP:BEFOR search.

May 2021

1. Z. H. Sikder University of Science and Technology: nominated at AfD; notified Maruf Hossain ( talk · contribs) 20:18, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: The article is only sourced to the institutions website. I've tried to find sources that might satisfy WP:ORG. I have found one article warning students against enrolling there, and another one telling us that the uni is run without a vice chancellor. Overall, I didn't see anything that would suggest significant coverage in a reliable source.

June 2021

1. Akshay KR Singh: nominated at AfD; notified Akshaykrsingh25 ( talk · contribs) 21:50, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: The article was deleted under A7 some time ago but there is a dubious claim to significant, which is why I'm bringing this here. Of the sources on the article, only No. 3 seems to mention him in any depth, not enough for notability under WP:GNG. I have not found substantial coverage of him and I'm unconvinced that, if coverage were to surface, he would be independently notable from the band. The article is also an autobiography.

July 2021

1. Riley Blake: nominated at AfD; notified Rambonie ( talk · contribs) 09:32, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: None of the sources in the article seem to cover the subject in any depth and most of the article is unsourced, in obvious violation of WP:BLP. From the article it emerges that he is an entirely ordinary staff writer/reporter with no special claim to notability. A Google search turns up a twitter account with a small amount of followers and not too much else. After the article has been deprodded, I now think it should be deleted for not meeting WP:GNG or WP:BIO.
2. Massimo Beber: nominated at AfD; notified Modernway ( talk · contribs) 14:15, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: This article has been unsourced for a decade. His academic profile falls far short of what is required for WP:NPROF: he was never a full professor and his publications have single digit-citation numbers on Google Scholar. I also have not found third-party coverage of him that would help towards WP:GNG. Overall, I think the article ought to be deleted.

August 2021

1. Aristopharma Ltd.: nominated at AfD; notified Tajwar.thesuperman ( talk · contribs) 18:34, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: The article is currently based on sources that are not sufficient to demonstrate notability: two are non-independent, one hardly amounts to significant coverage. In my search, I've not been able to find any form of independent coverage. The subject appears to be non-notable per WP:GNG and WP:NCORP.
2. Senior Member, Board of Revenue, Sindh: nominated at AfD; notified IBRAHIMNAWAZOVO ( talk · contribs) 09:28, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: The article is about a position within a sub-division of the local government of the Pakistani province of Sindh. While this seems like a distinctly niche topic, I would not object to its notability if there was coverage about the position itself (that is, not about its holders). The article is unreferenced and I have not found any significant coverage of the position. Yes, there is a government website proving that this position exists, but existence does not equal notability according to WP:GNG.

September 2021

1. Alphabet Business Concern: nominated at AfD; notified IAmAnIndividual ( talk · contribs) 21:41, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: The article is built on non-independent/unreliable sources. I have conducted a search which found remarkably little on this label; it seems clear to me that it isn't indecently notable of the band Cardiacs and doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:NORG. A redirect to Cardiacs might be in order.
2. ABC News Alert: nominated at AfD; notified Reggie Priolo ( talk · contribs) 20:42, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: This page has been around for a long time but seems never to have had any references. Apparently, I'm not the only person who has failed to locate any sourcing for this. Editors have tried to turn this into a redirect but the page was repeatedly restored. Without coverage, the programme is not independently notable. I would suggest a redirect to News5.

October 2021

1. Authena AG: nominated at AfD; notified GOODEDITORGP ( talk · contribs) 18:33, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: This company has some mentions online, but none of them are of the quality that would be considered significant coverage in a third-party source. They get trivial mentions in start-up rankings ( [5], [6]) and some promo coverage ( [7], [8]). I haven't seen any coverage worthy of WP:GNG/ WP:NCORP.
2. Gretex Corporate Services Limited: nominated at AfD; notified 2405:201:9004:EFBC:70D6:16C3:A941:4E9C ( talk · contribs) 21:03, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: The few sources in the article are non-independent or do not offer significant coverage. Yet, the article was accepted at AfD, but I'm sceptical about the subject's notability. The are publicly traded since this summer but, as WP:LISTED specifies, that does not make a company notable in itself. I am yet to see the level of coverage required for WP:GNG/ WP:NCORP. All I've been able to find is promotional coverage and press releases in connection with their IPO (e.g. [9] and [10]).

November 2021

1. Florencio Rojas (tattoo artist): nominated at AfD; notified Vedaa ( talk · contribs) 15:30, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: This article on a tattoo artist is sourced mainly from interviews. Being primary sources, they don't help us establish his notability. I've conducted a search and found no secondary coverage of him that could be classed as reliable, significant, and independent. I believe he doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NARTIST.
2. Alexandra Zerner: nominated at AfD; notified LesMusix ( talk · contribs) 20:25, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: The sources at the base of the article are not suitable to be the basis of a biographical article. I have conducted a search that turned up all manner of self-published content by Zerner but no reliable coverage. At this point, she does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NMUSIC.
3. Cheese On Bread: nominated at AfD; notified Justforming ( talk · contribs) 21:05, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: The references in the article do not meet the threshold for WP:GNG since there aren't multiple examples of signifiant coverage in reliabel third-party sources. (My BEFORE search didn't unearth anything of that variety either.) I don't see how any of the criteria at WP:BAND apply to them. The subject seems to be non-notable.
4. Dibson T. Hoffweiler: nominated at AfD; notified Horsebackordogsled ( talk · contribs) 21:18, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: The article has been unsourced for years. He falls far short of WP:NMUSIC and I have not been able to locate any third party coverage of him. The subject is unsuitable for inclusion on Wikipedia.
5. Wraith (band): nominated at AfD; notified Extrememedium ( talk · contribs) 13:39, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: I prodded this page with the following rationale:
     The one sources used in the article does not demonstrate the band's notability. In a WP:BEFORE search, I have not found any substantial coverage of them; I believe this is an uncontroversial failure to meet WP:GNG or WP:NBAND"
     Now, it has been pointed out that their 2017 album Revelation has received many reviews on hard rock websites (including [11], [12], [13] and others). This may confer notability on their album if the sources are reliable. Given that no significant coverage of the band itself has been brought forward, I believe that the above rationale still applies.
6. Asylumsoft Inc.: nominated at AfD; notified Dransikkid ( talk · contribs) 21:31, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: This video game developer doesn't seem to be entirely obscure: they were involved in making Ashen Empires. However, none of the sources presently in the article contain significant coverage. The better ones are just press releases. I have conducted a search and have found nothing better than what we already have; I think the subject doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NCORP.
7. Deependra Singh (Bollywood actor): nominated at AfD; notified Editorbrother ( talk · contribs) 13:17, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: The two sources in the article do not discuss the subject in depth. To be notable under WP:NACTOR, he would need to have had significant roles in two notable films. He appears in Prithviraj (film), but I'm not sure whether his role can be described as significant. Either way, his only other role (on Baahubali: The Beginning) was only minor. Without any significant coverage (I haven't found any), the article should be deleted under WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR.
8. Laura Mohiuddin: nominated at AfD; notified J1477 ( talk · contribs) 20:07, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Mohiuddin was involved in running a charity named Infolady, which is the subject of most of the sourced provided. None of them contain any sustained coverage of her person. Much is also non independent. Since I haven't been able to locate any good coverage myself, I don't see her meeting WP:GNG or WP:BIO.

December 2021

1. Milana Keller: nominated at AfD; notified ClassicalMusic33 ( talk · contribs) 22:41, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: The article was deleted in 2019 after an AfD concluded that she did not meet WP:GNG or WP:NMODEL. In the new version, only one source (the trivial profile on models.com) comes from after the AfD. Having done a search, I believe that her claim to notability has not changed since 2019. Hence, the article should be deleted again.

January 2022

1. Daisy Lovelace: nominated at AfD; notified FrantisekKorbel ( talk · contribs) 20:40, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: The article is essentially a typed-out CV for an instructor at LinkedIn Learning. Its sourcing is non-independent and contains a good deal from LinkedIn itself. Her academic career is not distinguished enough to meet any of the criteria at WP:NPROF. I have not found any substantial reliable coverage that would point towards her meeting WP:GNG.

May 2022

1. President (video game): nominated at AfD; notified TomMayhew ( talk · contribs) 14:04, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: The article has only been sourced to databases since its creation in January and lots remains unsourced. One sources says that there have been four magazine reviews, but I'm not sure whether that information is reliable and whether any of these reviews were substantial. I have not been able to locate coverage in an online search. I would propose to draftify until better sourcing is produced, but the article is over 90 days old and it therefore needs a consensus decision.

June 2022

1. Wildgirl: nominated at AfD; notified Giacomo1968 ( talk · contribs) 16:53, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: The article has one solid source (the NYT piece) that contributes towards WP:GNG. The other three sources do not contribute to notability, by virtue of being unsubstantial and/or unreliable. It has been surprisingly hard to find useful sources about her and it seems that the decision taken at the last AfD should be upheld.
2. Wulf Kessler: nominated at AfD; notified Weissepedia ( talk · contribs) 20:15, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Even though the subject has a German Wikipedia article, the sourcing both there and on en.wiki is very poor. His only big role was in Die Weisse Rose, which means he does not meet WP:NACTOR. I have seen no substantial coverage of him nor has a newspaper search via Factiva yielded any results.
3. Lines.com: nominated at AfD; notified Agilel Gidobada ( talk · contribs) 16:23, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: The sources offer nothing more than passing mentions of some studies conducted by Lines.com. I have not been able to find any meaningful third-party coverage about this website. It appears it does not meet WP:WEBPAGE/ WP:GNG.

December 2022

1. Luka Jurinčič: nominated at AfD; notified Nik Kranjec ( talk · contribs) 16:54, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: The subject was the executive producer of the short film Love In Plane Sight. It think it's likely that the creator (who has an apparent conflict of interest) considers him notable under WP:CREATIVE #3 or WP:ANYBIO #1. I don't think that these criteria extend to every person involved in creating a creative work. In this case, it seems clear that notability is extended to Matej Rimanić and Nik Kranjec. Given that I have found no independent/significant coverage of this person, I think a redirect to the film might be the best option.
2. Emmy Rose Cuvelier: nominated at AfD; notified Sharpgirl22 ( talk · contribs) 09:47, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: I have not found any in-depth coverage of this subject in reliable sources. Yes, there exists an essay ( WP:NBEAUTY) claiming that Miss World participants are presumed notable. But given the lack of coverage, I believe that this presumption of notability would be wrong.

January 2023

1. Morgann Book: nominated at AfD; notified Trakaplex ( talk · contribs) 20:35, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: The sources provided do not show that the subject meets WP:GNG. None of them offers any analysis and they are full of quotes from the subject. I have found this piece in The New Yorker, which only mentions her superficially. I'm happy to consider further sources, but at the moment I believe the subject is not notable.

February 2023

1. Nigel Braun: nominated at AfD; notified Ricciardo Best ( talk · contribs) 20:29, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Of the three sources in the article, the Michigan Daily article constitutes substantial coverage. The other two don't since they offer hardly any secondary coverage of Braun. I think the creator has done the best job possible in terms of sourcing: as with many YouTube personalities, it's easy to retrieve information on him, but I haven't found any substantial pieces in solid sources. I think he misses our GNG at this time.

August 2023

1. Category:People murdered in an embassy: nominated at CfD (CfD); notified Rasnaboy ( talk · contribs) 18:26, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: The category seems to have been specifically created for the one page it currently hosts. There is hardly any scope for further pages to be added.
2. Philodoppides: nominated at AfD; notified LegesRomanorum ( talk · contribs) 18:29, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: As Poimenlaon suggests on the talk page, this article appears to be a well-crafted hoax: Gerber, who is repeatedly cited, does not even mention a poet named Philodoppides. Neither do Callimachus frr. 439-40 or Maciver. The two important modern reference works ( Oxford Classical Dictionary and Brill's New Pauly) carry no hint of this supposed poet. Everything points to this article's being a hoax and as such should be deleted.