Reason: Since schools are not A7 eligible, I propose this for deletion since the article has no claim to importance. Available sources are of non-independent nature.
Reason: This person is the owner of company in the UK. This does not make them notable. All links provided merely point to the existence of said company. Searching for his name did not turn up any coverage of note. Not to mention that nothing in the article is referenced with inline sources, violation
WP:BLP. It is obvious that this subject is not notable under
WP:GNG or
WP:BIO.
Reason: A
WP:BEFORE search has not helped me find any third-party claim to notability for this middle school. The trivial information in this article seems to derive from someone closely connected to the institution. Since schools are note eligible for CSD A7, I'm proposing to delete this page.
Reason: None of the sources cover him independently in any significant detail. A search shows that this subject is merely an ordinary musician who is far removed from meeting either
WP:GNG or
WP:NMUSIC. His social media profiles (subscriber count in the hundreds), while not relevant for notability, give a good idea of how little media attention he has gained.
Reason: The sources don't cover the subject in any depth. I have found virtually no coverage of this individual myself. I believe he is very far from meeting
WP:GNG or
WP:NMUSIC
Reason: Running for office does not confer automatic notability, nor does being an amateur footballer. The sources given are not significant coverage and I have not been able to retrieve any myself. This autobiography clearly falls short of
WP:GNG,
WP:NPOL, and
WP:NFOOTBALL
Reason: The creator has made not attempt at referencing this article with reliable third-party coverage. I have not managed to find any such coverage myself and I believe this is an uncontroversial case for deletion for failure to meet
WP:GNG and
WP:NORG.
Reason: The one sources used in the article does not demonstrate the band's notability. In a
WP:BEFORE search, I have not found any substantial coverage of them; I believe this is an uncontroversial failure to meet
WP:GNG or
WP:NBAND
Reason: The references are all to the programme's website. The coverage available online seems all to be promotional or connected to the programme itself. Given the complete lack of reliable third-party sources, I believe this to be an uncontroversial deletion under
WP:GNG and
WP:NCORP.
Reason: Since schools are not A7 eligible, I propose this for deletion since the article has no claim to importance. Available sources are of non-independent nature.
Reason: This person is the owner of company in the UK. This does not make them notable. All links provided merely point to the existence of said company. Searching for his name did not turn up any coverage of note. Not to mention that nothing in the article is referenced with inline sources, violation
WP:BLP. It is obvious that this subject is not notable under
WP:GNG or
WP:BIO.
Reason: A
WP:BEFORE search has not helped me find any third-party claim to notability for this middle school. The trivial information in this article seems to derive from someone closely connected to the institution. Since schools are note eligible for CSD A7, I'm proposing to delete this page.
Reason: None of the sources cover him independently in any significant detail. A search shows that this subject is merely an ordinary musician who is far removed from meeting either
WP:GNG or
WP:NMUSIC. His social media profiles (subscriber count in the hundreds), while not relevant for notability, give a good idea of how little media attention he has gained.
Reason: The sources don't cover the subject in any depth. I have found virtually no coverage of this individual myself. I believe he is very far from meeting
WP:GNG or
WP:NMUSIC
Reason: Running for office does not confer automatic notability, nor does being an amateur footballer. The sources given are not significant coverage and I have not been able to retrieve any myself. This autobiography clearly falls short of
WP:GNG,
WP:NPOL, and
WP:NFOOTBALL
Reason: The creator has made not attempt at referencing this article with reliable third-party coverage. I have not managed to find any such coverage myself and I believe this is an uncontroversial case for deletion for failure to meet
WP:GNG and
WP:NORG.
Reason: The one sources used in the article does not demonstrate the band's notability. In a
WP:BEFORE search, I have not found any substantial coverage of them; I believe this is an uncontroversial failure to meet
WP:GNG or
WP:NBAND
Reason: The references are all to the programme's website. The coverage available online seems all to be promotional or connected to the programme itself. Given the complete lack of reliable third-party sources, I believe this to be an uncontroversial deletion under
WP:GNG and
WP:NCORP.