It seems like you have picked a good topic. However, your sandbox was hard to follow. Consider adding the subtitle or mentioning which part from the original wiki page you edited. Please use the citation for your work.
I would assume that your first paragraph is a summary of the Biomolecular NMR spectroscopy part. But it seems like everything is already mentioned on the original Wiki page.
In your second paragraph: It's good to have the equation on J-coupling and the change in peak height, but I don't get why you mention the change in peak height. Consider expanding your rationale on this part.
Then, you started talking about the orientations of R groups on the aromatic ring which is good. It's all good that you have some image drafts on this part. Keep up your good work and consider using ChemDraw or other virtual tools to make your images better.
 | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
- Whose work are you reviewing?
(provide username)
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)
It seems like you have picked a good topic. However, your sandbox was hard to follow. Consider adding the subtitle or mentioning which part from the original wiki page you edited. Please use the citation for your work.
I would assume that your first paragraph is a summary of the Biomolecular NMR spectroscopy part. But it seems like everything is already mentioned on the original Wiki page.
In your second paragraph: It's good to have the equation on J-coupling and the change in peak height, but I don't get why you mention the change in peak height. Consider expanding your rationale on this part.
Then, you started talking about the orientations of R groups on the aromatic ring which is good. It's all good that you have some image drafts on this part. Keep up your good work and consider using ChemDraw or other virtual tools to make your images better.
| Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
- Whose work are you reviewing?
(provide username)
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)