![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
Manweyyyy
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)
Guiding questions:
Minor additions, I believe, were added/changed in the lead. The lead covers the above statements accurately, being fulfilling in the correct content, coverage, and conciseness.
Guiding questions:
From what I gleaned from the bibliography, including the added source, the content is up to date and accurate. The information added adequately covered content gaps in the Racism and Wages section well as pieces including the Haymarket Riot and the C.A. Hall.
Guiding questions:
The tone remains intact from the original page, neutral and objective. Good job gang!
Guiding questions:
A lot of the sources have already been checked, but of the one this group added, the content is accurate and the link works.
Guiding questions:
I've already mentioned this, but the content added blends well and follows the structure of the article for clear reading ease.
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media
I don't believe they added any pictures or other media. Disregard this section.
Guiding questions:
The content added has been accurate, plot hole filling, and blends well with the base page. Much improved!
![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
Manweyyyy
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)
Guiding questions:
Minor additions, I believe, were added/changed in the lead. The lead covers the above statements accurately, being fulfilling in the correct content, coverage, and conciseness.
Guiding questions:
From what I gleaned from the bibliography, including the added source, the content is up to date and accurate. The information added adequately covered content gaps in the Racism and Wages section well as pieces including the Haymarket Riot and the C.A. Hall.
Guiding questions:
The tone remains intact from the original page, neutral and objective. Good job gang!
Guiding questions:
A lot of the sources have already been checked, but of the one this group added, the content is accurate and the link works.
Guiding questions:
I've already mentioned this, but the content added blends well and follows the structure of the article for clear reading ease.
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media
I don't believe they added any pictures or other media. Disregard this section.
Guiding questions:
The content added has been accurate, plot hole filling, and blends well with the base page. Much improved!