recreations

Looks like you may have tagged this for deletion and it appears to be an almost immediate a recreation. I'll let you decide what to do with it. We need to think of what can be done in the software to improve the processing of issues like these. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 10:55, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

I had it on my watchlist, so I would have followed up in the morning if necessary. I found it was a duplicate of declined Draft:Newport, and I tagged it for G10 as an experiment - not sure if that applies when the duplicate is a draft (admin discretion?). The recreation was moved to draft by someone else, so now there are two drafts, which is what I was trying to avoid. It was recreated a third time and then G11'd. A typical case of someone ignoring being told their article doesn't qualify. Yes, we should talk about this. MB 16:25, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Got any suggestions? It would probably need a software solution unless a friendly admin would salt things like this. Even salting doesn't always work due to obvious workarounds. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 05:54, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Most of these are probably caught quickly by our crack NPPers. But I'm sure more could be done. I watch the daily update to Wikipedia:WikiProject_Disambiguation/Article_alerts (I have been involved with dabs since way before NPP). What about a bot that looked at every article CSD over a time period (perhaps a week) and listed articles created by the same author (since the deletion), or a title match or near-match by any author. It wouldn't prevent the immediate recreations, but it might cause some issues to be noticed sooner or not fall through the cracks. MB 16:56, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Two-stage reviewing

Autopatrol quality audit

Tutorial Merge updates

Move to Draft min/max warning

Updated tutorial to match

Move to Draft gadget

when stable, move? disable old version?