![]() | Evaluate an article
Complete your article evaluation below. Here are the key aspects to consider: Lead sectionA good lead section defines the topic and provides a concise overview. A reader who just wants to identify the topic can read the first sentence. A reader who wants a very brief overview of the most important things about it can read the first paragraph. A reader who wants a quick overview can read the whole lead section.
ContentA good Wikipedia article should cover all the important aspects of a topic, without putting too much weight on one part while neglecting another.
Tone and BalanceWikipedia articles should be written from a neutral point of view; if there are substantial differences of interpretation or controversies among published, reliable sources, those views should be described as fairly as possible.
Sources and ReferencesA Wikipedia article should be based on the best sources available for the topic at hand. When possible, this means academic and peer-reviewed publications or scholarly books.
Organization and writing qualityThe writing should be clear and professional, the content should be organized sensibly into sections.
Images and Media
Talk page discussionThe article's talk page — and any discussions among other Wikipedia editors that have been taking place there — can be a useful window into the state of an article, and might help you focus on important aspects that you didn't think of.
Overall impressions
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved. |
I am passionate about rocketry, and I believe that liquid-propelled rockets are the single most important technology when it comes to space exploration.
Lead Section:
The lead section is good overall. I think that the organization is a little weird, but all in all it captures what needs to be said about the topic in a concise manner.
Content:
The biggest shortcoming of the article's content is the lack of information about the advantages of using liquid propellant in a rocket. The article goes in depth describing the issues associated with using liquid propellants, but only briefly mention the positive aspects. Furthermore, when the positive aspects are mentioned, they are simply just stated as properties of the technology. I believe that it is important to highlight why liquid propelled rockets are so attractive when it comes to selecting a type of rocket to use for a space mission.
![]() | Evaluate an article
Complete your article evaluation below. Here are the key aspects to consider: Lead sectionA good lead section defines the topic and provides a concise overview. A reader who just wants to identify the topic can read the first sentence. A reader who wants a very brief overview of the most important things about it can read the first paragraph. A reader who wants a quick overview can read the whole lead section.
ContentA good Wikipedia article should cover all the important aspects of a topic, without putting too much weight on one part while neglecting another.
Tone and BalanceWikipedia articles should be written from a neutral point of view; if there are substantial differences of interpretation or controversies among published, reliable sources, those views should be described as fairly as possible.
Sources and ReferencesA Wikipedia article should be based on the best sources available for the topic at hand. When possible, this means academic and peer-reviewed publications or scholarly books.
Organization and writing qualityThe writing should be clear and professional, the content should be organized sensibly into sections.
Images and Media
Talk page discussionThe article's talk page — and any discussions among other Wikipedia editors that have been taking place there — can be a useful window into the state of an article, and might help you focus on important aspects that you didn't think of.
Overall impressions
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved. |
I am passionate about rocketry, and I believe that liquid-propelled rockets are the single most important technology when it comes to space exploration.
Lead Section:
The lead section is good overall. I think that the organization is a little weird, but all in all it captures what needs to be said about the topic in a concise manner.
Content:
The biggest shortcoming of the article's content is the lack of information about the advantages of using liquid propellant in a rocket. The article goes in depth describing the issues associated with using liquid propellants, but only briefly mention the positive aspects. Furthermore, when the positive aspects are mentioned, they are simply just stated as properties of the technology. I believe that it is important to highlight why liquid propelled rockets are so attractive when it comes to selecting a type of rocket to use for a space mission.