This is a Wikipedia
user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lissajous. |
Please proofread the daily tip...
It's displayed below one day early. Some tips are obsolete. So we need new tips too. Please share your best tips and tip ideas at the Tip of the day department. Tomorrow's tip of the day... Beware of instruction creep
Also called instructionitis, instruction creep is the tendency of instructions to grow and grow, until they become so long and complex that nobody wants to read them. When editing help pages, or instructions for Wikipedia's departments, please make them clear and concise, reducing them whenever possible. – – Read more: To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{
totd-tomorrow}}
|
Mostly I wish people would write more concisely and carefully, omitting needles words and avoiding weasel words and peacock terms. That probably captures most of my editing changes. Simple things reflecting some of the sentiments in Strunk's The_Elements_of_Style. Don't worry too much about what Geoffrey K. Pullum says about the horrid little book at language log - he's barking up a different tree, mostly upset that someone made a list of rules almost a 100 years ago, and that some people take them as commandments.
Discrepancy between Minuteman entry on flight computer and importance to integrated circuits, and what I've seen from the AGC. IN particular, Minuteman originally used discretes (whereas AGC used ICs). Also, it's not clear that the minuteman programs use of ICs was "crucial" to IC development. Also, they were significant customers, but they did not drive the research and development leading to ICs. Cart in front of the horse? Maybe.
LGM-30 Minuteman http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGM-30_Minuteman#Minuteman-II_.28LGM-30F.29
Apollo spacecraft - singular vs plural. What constitutes a spacecraft? In NASA's view, were they individual spacecraft (yes) or components of 1 space craft (yes).
Note that the claim in AGC that "The Apollo flight computer was the first to use integrated circuits (ICs)" needs to be backed up by a reference. I'm looking at some of the AGC project info for a clear one on this. I'd like solid figures on numbers of ICs used in AGC vs total sales.
I'm trying to work out how the various Apollo pages are related. Particularly the Apollo Program and its relationship to AGC, PGNCS, LM, and CM, but also in the wider context of the various missions, hardware, and people.
Also discussion of AGC and 1201/1202 alarms in Apollo 11 is slightly inconsistent/wrong - working to put together a clearer description.
Note in History_of_computing_hardware#Second generation: transistors that there is no mention of the intermediate step - integrated circuit based computers post transistor and pre intel 4004 - e.g., the AGC and the Minuteman guidance computers.
A blog with a timeline of IC development and usage in Apollo and military - no references, but no matter - can track it down
Reference from Apollo-11 crew to the 1201 and 1202 cautions during the LM powered descent:
{{
citation}}
: More than one of |author=
and |last=
specified (
help){{
citation}}
: Unknown parameter |NASA_Info=
ignored (
help); Unknown parameter |abstract=
ignored (
help); Unknown parameter |url2=
ignored (
help){{
citation}}
: Unknown parameter |NASA_Accession_ID=
ignored (
help); Unknown parameter |NASA_DocumentID=
ignored (
help); Unknown parameter |NASA_Report Number=
ignored (
help)[ [1]]
Done - merged over into the LRO article some while ago (but pre-impact ... no doubt changed by now)
Are both notable for being poor quality. Why? Also, why so many different poor pages for types of electric motors.
This is a Wikipedia
user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lissajous. |
Please proofread the daily tip...
It's displayed below one day early. Some tips are obsolete. So we need new tips too. Please share your best tips and tip ideas at the Tip of the day department. Tomorrow's tip of the day... Beware of instruction creep
Also called instructionitis, instruction creep is the tendency of instructions to grow and grow, until they become so long and complex that nobody wants to read them. When editing help pages, or instructions for Wikipedia's departments, please make them clear and concise, reducing them whenever possible. – – Read more: To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{
totd-tomorrow}}
|
Mostly I wish people would write more concisely and carefully, omitting needles words and avoiding weasel words and peacock terms. That probably captures most of my editing changes. Simple things reflecting some of the sentiments in Strunk's The_Elements_of_Style. Don't worry too much about what Geoffrey K. Pullum says about the horrid little book at language log - he's barking up a different tree, mostly upset that someone made a list of rules almost a 100 years ago, and that some people take them as commandments.
Discrepancy between Minuteman entry on flight computer and importance to integrated circuits, and what I've seen from the AGC. IN particular, Minuteman originally used discretes (whereas AGC used ICs). Also, it's not clear that the minuteman programs use of ICs was "crucial" to IC development. Also, they were significant customers, but they did not drive the research and development leading to ICs. Cart in front of the horse? Maybe.
LGM-30 Minuteman http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGM-30_Minuteman#Minuteman-II_.28LGM-30F.29
Apollo spacecraft - singular vs plural. What constitutes a spacecraft? In NASA's view, were they individual spacecraft (yes) or components of 1 space craft (yes).
Note that the claim in AGC that "The Apollo flight computer was the first to use integrated circuits (ICs)" needs to be backed up by a reference. I'm looking at some of the AGC project info for a clear one on this. I'd like solid figures on numbers of ICs used in AGC vs total sales.
I'm trying to work out how the various Apollo pages are related. Particularly the Apollo Program and its relationship to AGC, PGNCS, LM, and CM, but also in the wider context of the various missions, hardware, and people.
Also discussion of AGC and 1201/1202 alarms in Apollo 11 is slightly inconsistent/wrong - working to put together a clearer description.
Note in History_of_computing_hardware#Second generation: transistors that there is no mention of the intermediate step - integrated circuit based computers post transistor and pre intel 4004 - e.g., the AGC and the Minuteman guidance computers.
A blog with a timeline of IC development and usage in Apollo and military - no references, but no matter - can track it down
Reference from Apollo-11 crew to the 1201 and 1202 cautions during the LM powered descent:
{{
citation}}
: More than one of |author=
and |last=
specified (
help){{
citation}}
: Unknown parameter |NASA_Info=
ignored (
help); Unknown parameter |abstract=
ignored (
help); Unknown parameter |url2=
ignored (
help){{
citation}}
: Unknown parameter |NASA_Accession_ID=
ignored (
help); Unknown parameter |NASA_DocumentID=
ignored (
help); Unknown parameter |NASA_Report Number=
ignored (
help)[ [1]]
Done - merged over into the LRO article some while ago (but pre-impact ... no doubt changed by now)
Are both notable for being poor quality. Why? Also, why so many different poor pages for types of electric motors.