- First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that describes the subject in a clear way?
----This article has a great introduction. I love that instead of combining everything into one massive paragraph, you split the information up into three paragraphs which makes it easier to get through. The information you included all throughout the article is ordered perfectly in my opinion.
- What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement?
----I really do not have anything I believe the author needs to change. The one suggestion I do have will be mentioned in question 3.
- What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?
---I believe that this article is very well formulated. However, the most important thing I think the author should do is include a final concluding statement or mini paragraph at the end to smoothly close out this entry.
- Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know!
----I thoroughly appreciated that you put headings and subheadings all throughout your entry because seeing as though this is an article that has never been written on wikipedia before, this is the perfect way for people to easily search and locate information within this entry. I will definitely incorporate this in my article because all I have included is a title. I also really love how you added the feature where you can click on the blue highlighted words to see what things mean. This is great because people can use this feature to become familiar with terms or people they have never heard of which helps them further fully comprehend the information. I will be doing this in my article as well. Overall amazing job!
 | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional ResourcesCheck out the Editing Wikipedia PDF for general editing tips and suggestions. |
General info
- Whose work are you reviewing?
Leeanntsiao
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- /info/en/?search=User:Leeanntsiao/Okuzini_Cave
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)
- First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that describes the subject in a clear way?
----This article has a great introduction. I love that instead of combining everything into one massive paragraph, you split the information up into three paragraphs which makes it easier to get through. The information you included all throughout the article is ordered perfectly in my opinion.
- What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement?
----I really do not have anything I believe the author needs to change. The one suggestion I do have will be mentioned in question 3.
- What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?
---I believe that this article is very well formulated. However, the most important thing I think the author should do is include a final concluding statement or mini paragraph at the end to smoothly close out this entry.
- Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know!
----I thoroughly appreciated that you put headings and subheadings all throughout your entry because seeing as though this is an article that has never been written on wikipedia before, this is the perfect way for people to easily search and locate information within this entry. I will definitely incorporate this in my article because all I have included is a title. I also really love how you added the feature where you can click on the blue highlighted words to see what things mean. This is great because people can use this feature to become familiar with terms or people they have never heard of which helps them further fully comprehend the information. I will be doing this in my article as well. Overall amazing job!
| Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional ResourcesCheck out the Editing Wikipedia PDF for general editing tips and suggestions. |
General info
- Whose work are you reviewing?
Leeanntsiao
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- /info/en/?search=User:Leeanntsiao/Okuzini_Cave
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)