The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Fram has requested I provide surrebuttals to his rebuttals to my response to his most recent proposal for a DYK TBAN against me. The reason I did not provide surrebuttals to his previous rebuttals is that I had previously committed to an admin to disengage from that thread and was unable to do so without violating that commitment. In respect of Fram's repeated requests, and as a possible workaround, I am posting my response here in lieu of the thread itself. Following are the statements by me Fram has requested proof of:
1. LavaBaron: Fram has already misrepresented my past actions once, resulting in a bad block.
all of the following, except where otherwise specified, quoted from [ closed AN thread (linked here for ease of reading in lieu of diffs)
2. LavaBaron: This seems to have become a personal vendetta from Fram due to a tiff we had a few months ago over an unrelated matter
3. LavaBaron: He was previously warned by Ritchie to WP:DROPTHESTICK with regard to it.
4. Fram goes on to allege canvassing by me. | Fram: Perhaps throw in some canvassing as well? Note that LavaBaron started this section with "GF ping everyone who registered a !vote in the linked discussion ", and then only pinged three people who supported the lifting of part of the restrictions and one who commented (seemingly in favour of lifting them all), but none of the more negative commenters; and followed this up with, in a proposal from me, pinging everyone he believed had recently had a DYK pulled by me.
LavaBaron ( talk) 18:46, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Fram has requested I provide surrebuttals to his rebuttals to my response to his most recent proposal for a DYK TBAN against me. The reason I did not provide surrebuttals to his previous rebuttals is that I had previously committed to an admin to disengage from that thread and was unable to do so without violating that commitment. In respect of Fram's repeated requests, and as a possible workaround, I am posting my response here in lieu of the thread itself. Following are the statements by me Fram has requested proof of:
1. LavaBaron: Fram has already misrepresented my past actions once, resulting in a bad block.
all of the following, except where otherwise specified, quoted from [ closed AN thread (linked here for ease of reading in lieu of diffs)
2. LavaBaron: This seems to have become a personal vendetta from Fram due to a tiff we had a few months ago over an unrelated matter
3. LavaBaron: He was previously warned by Ritchie to WP:DROPTHESTICK with regard to it.
4. Fram goes on to allege canvassing by me. | Fram: Perhaps throw in some canvassing as well? Note that LavaBaron started this section with "GF ping everyone who registered a !vote in the linked discussion ", and then only pinged three people who supported the lifting of part of the restrictions and one who commented (seemingly in favour of lifting them all), but none of the more negative commenters; and followed this up with, in a proposal from me, pinging everyone he believed had recently had a DYK pulled by me.
LavaBaron ( talk) 18:46, 18 August 2016 (UTC)