This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.

• Name of article: (link) Angels with Dirty Faces
• Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. This article belongs to C class article which is suitable to evaluate because this article need to improve. Therefore, i can use many criteria just learned.

Guiding questions

• Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? yes
• Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? yes
• Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? no
• Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? concise

Guiding questions

• Is the article's content relevant to the topic?yes
• Is the content up-to-date?yes
• Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? the content is exactly what it is.
• Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? no
• Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?no

Guiding questions

• Is the article neutral? yes
• Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
• Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? no
• Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? this article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position which is this film is a good film.

Guiding questions

• Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?yes
• Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?yes
• Are the sources current?yes
• Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?yes
• Check a few links. Do they work?it is working

Guiding questions

• Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? this article is clear. It present the table of content at the beginning and write the article by the guide of the table of content which is very logical.
• Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? no
• Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? this article divide by seven parts to present its' theme.

Guiding questions

• Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?no
• Are images well-captioned?yes
• Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?yes
• Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?no

Guiding questions

• What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
• How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? yes
• How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Guiding questions

• What is the article's overall status? the overall status is great
• What are the article's strengths? the strengths of article is clear. the whole content is clear and logical.
• How can the article be improved? images should be improved
• How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? the article is well-developed.

• Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~~~~

• Link to feedback: