Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.
I am leaning towards option 2 or 3 for my article assignment.
- Cultivation theory
- Article Evaluation
- The article is very well written article. The information and pictures are relevant to their section in the article. Good academic sources are used. I do not believe it tackles one of wikipedia's equity gaps.
- Sources
- https://ocul-uo.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01OCUL_UO/17s70c5/cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_jcom_12128
- Mediatization (media)
- Article Evaluation
- It is well written, clear, and easy to follow. It uses a neutral tone. The sources look academic and credible and I was able to access the ones I clicked on. It does not have any pictures and in my opinion, is missing theorists that helped contribute to the field. This would be a good one to edit and add information and relevant pictures.
- Sources
- https://ocul-uo.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01OCUL_UO/17s70c5/cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1940161208319097
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323104040696
- Medium theory
- Article Evaluation
- The article is very short. It is well written and does use a neutral tone throughout. The sources look academic and are easy to access to verify the information. The article is missing information and may be a good one to edit and add information too. It is also missing pictures so adding relevant pictures to go along with the information would be helpful.
- Sources
- https://www.communicationtheory.org/medium-theory/
- https://ocul-uo.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01OCUL_UO/s28b5q/alma991044991865005161
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.
I am leaning towards option 2 or 3 for my article assignment.
- Cultivation theory
- Article Evaluation
- The article is very well written article. The information and pictures are relevant to their section in the article. Good academic sources are used. I do not believe it tackles one of wikipedia's equity gaps.
- Sources
- https://ocul-uo.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01OCUL_UO/17s70c5/cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_jcom_12128
- Mediatization (media)
- Article Evaluation
- It is well written, clear, and easy to follow. It uses a neutral tone. The sources look academic and credible and I was able to access the ones I clicked on. It does not have any pictures and in my opinion, is missing theorists that helped contribute to the field. This would be a good one to edit and add information and relevant pictures.
- Sources
- https://ocul-uo.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01OCUL_UO/17s70c5/cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1940161208319097
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323104040696
- Medium theory
- Article Evaluation
- The article is very short. It is well written and does use a neutral tone throughout. The sources look academic and are easy to access to verify the information. The article is missing information and may be a good one to edit and add information too. It is also missing pictures so adding relevant pictures to go along with the information would be helpful.
- Sources
- https://www.communicationtheory.org/medium-theory/
- https://ocul-uo.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01OCUL_UO/s28b5q/alma991044991865005161