This user thinks that strength comes from one's argument. Adding Strong to Support/Oppose doesn't give it any more weight.
This alleged user can be said to maintain an ill-defined policy or other custom of neutrality or other ambiguity-related quality on some or all issues that may be potentially controversial to some alleged people.
This user is a preservationist who believes Wikipedians should avoid agressive non-notability deletion and advocates that the
notability rule be amended to specify that any subject with some historical value can merit an article.
Details here.
This user thinks that strength comes from one's argument. Adding Strong to Support/Oppose doesn't give it any more weight.
This alleged user can be said to maintain an ill-defined policy or other custom of neutrality or other ambiguity-related quality on some or all issues that may be potentially controversial to some alleged people.
This user is a preservationist who believes Wikipedians should avoid agressive non-notability deletion and advocates that the
notability rule be amended to specify that any subject with some historical value can merit an article.
Details here.