![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
Kbee2
The content of this page is relevant and organized well. Each section lays out topical information, with clear and concise elaboration. The topics are laid out well, and there are topic sentences that point reader in the right direction. Citations are used well, and used frequently and effectively. The links are functional, and reliable. The content is relevant and well written, but slightly simple. The sections regarding remains and dated archeological digs need much more detail. There is no information regarding who had done the digs, or other relevant information regarding the archeologists involved, so information on that would be helpful. Any information regarding the amount of certain remains would also be good. Overall, this is a good start, and there are no major issues regarding the information or the sources and organization.
![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
Kbee2
The content of this page is relevant and organized well. Each section lays out topical information, with clear and concise elaboration. The topics are laid out well, and there are topic sentences that point reader in the right direction. Citations are used well, and used frequently and effectively. The links are functional, and reliable. The content is relevant and well written, but slightly simple. The sections regarding remains and dated archeological digs need much more detail. There is no information regarding who had done the digs, or other relevant information regarding the archeologists involved, so information on that would be helpful. Any information regarding the amount of certain remains would also be good. Overall, this is a good start, and there are no major issues regarding the information or the sources and organization.