![]() |
Hi KarmaChameleon! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 17 February 2017 (UTC) |
A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 17:26, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Draft:List of Muslim sex abuse rings in the United Kingdom, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for
deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:List of Muslim sex abuse rings in the United Kingdom and please be sure to
sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
Draft:List of Muslim sex abuse rings in the United Kingdom during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
Roger (Dodger67) (
talk)
18:18, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
The "article" is going to be deleted anyway, but if you pull a stunt like that again I will just block you indefintely. Read the article - Champion referred to a possible total of a million victims of CSE in total in the UK (that's every possible form of CSE in every area of the country, from rape to human trafficking to far more minor issues such as sexting, not from these few sex rings). Black Kite (talk) 18:36, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
KarmaChameleon. --
Guy Macon (
talk)
19:52, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
KarmaChameleon ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I notice I have been blocked indefinitely. Based on what? Your decision to block me seems rather hasty. My first article User:KarmaChameleon/sandbox that I had created in my sandbox gets pushed by an admin to Draft:List of Muslim sex abuse rings in the United Kingdom (without any consent whether I was ready with the article). Once moved to Draft stage it is then is then put through MFD and deleted by admins. I also not allowed to save it in my sandbox because that version has been deleted as well. I have two requests: ::* Please restore the last version of Draft:List of Muslim sex abuse rings in the United Kingdom to my sandbox so I get an opportunity to fix it. ::* Please point out edits that made you indefinitely block me. ::Please let me know how I can get my block reviewed. Thanks! - KarmaChameleon ( talk) 22:03, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
The block review is right here. Here, you explain what you will do differently. How will you contribute to a neutral encyclopedia? El_C 22:16, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
KarmaChameleon ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I would request the blocking admins to point out exactly what ticked them off to block me indefinitely. I am ready to make changes only if I know where I have gone wrong. I am here to contribute to Wikipedia by contributing information backed by reliable sources.
Decline reason:
It isn't that you ticked off the admins, it is that you have a fairly transparent agenda and were engaging in what we refer to as point-of-view pushing as opposed to the neutral point-of-view expected from an encyclopedia. For reference, recall basically every single edit you have made. I'll grant that most of those have now been deleted but I'm sure you recall sufficiently what they were. Beeblebrox ( talk) 01:09, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
KarmaChameleon ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
As explained by NinjaRobotPirate my edits make it seem that I am using Wikipedia as a soapbox to criticise Islam. Going forward, I am willing to avoid editing articles that criticise Islam and its aspects. Also, I will cite sources that support all points of views on a subject. I have also read through core content policies to understand what's expected here. Request you to please unblock me. — KarmaChameleon ( talk) 13:23, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you can't explain your edits, I can't unblock you. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 21:40, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Can you explain the reasons for your previous edits? — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 14:52, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
I think you will need to agree to not make any edits that criticize Islam, as most (all?) of your edits to date seem to have done. Slatersteven ( talk) 17:07, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi KarmaChameleon! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 17 February 2017 (UTC) |
A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 17:26, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Draft:List of Muslim sex abuse rings in the United Kingdom, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for
deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:List of Muslim sex abuse rings in the United Kingdom and please be sure to
sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
Draft:List of Muslim sex abuse rings in the United Kingdom during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
Roger (Dodger67) (
talk)
18:18, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
The "article" is going to be deleted anyway, but if you pull a stunt like that again I will just block you indefintely. Read the article - Champion referred to a possible total of a million victims of CSE in total in the UK (that's every possible form of CSE in every area of the country, from rape to human trafficking to far more minor issues such as sexting, not from these few sex rings). Black Kite (talk) 18:36, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
KarmaChameleon. --
Guy Macon (
talk)
19:52, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
KarmaChameleon ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I notice I have been blocked indefinitely. Based on what? Your decision to block me seems rather hasty. My first article User:KarmaChameleon/sandbox that I had created in my sandbox gets pushed by an admin to Draft:List of Muslim sex abuse rings in the United Kingdom (without any consent whether I was ready with the article). Once moved to Draft stage it is then is then put through MFD and deleted by admins. I also not allowed to save it in my sandbox because that version has been deleted as well. I have two requests: ::* Please restore the last version of Draft:List of Muslim sex abuse rings in the United Kingdom to my sandbox so I get an opportunity to fix it. ::* Please point out edits that made you indefinitely block me. ::Please let me know how I can get my block reviewed. Thanks! - KarmaChameleon ( talk) 22:03, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
The block review is right here. Here, you explain what you will do differently. How will you contribute to a neutral encyclopedia? El_C 22:16, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
KarmaChameleon ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I would request the blocking admins to point out exactly what ticked them off to block me indefinitely. I am ready to make changes only if I know where I have gone wrong. I am here to contribute to Wikipedia by contributing information backed by reliable sources.
Decline reason:
It isn't that you ticked off the admins, it is that you have a fairly transparent agenda and were engaging in what we refer to as point-of-view pushing as opposed to the neutral point-of-view expected from an encyclopedia. For reference, recall basically every single edit you have made. I'll grant that most of those have now been deleted but I'm sure you recall sufficiently what they were. Beeblebrox ( talk) 01:09, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
KarmaChameleon ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
As explained by NinjaRobotPirate my edits make it seem that I am using Wikipedia as a soapbox to criticise Islam. Going forward, I am willing to avoid editing articles that criticise Islam and its aspects. Also, I will cite sources that support all points of views on a subject. I have also read through core content policies to understand what's expected here. Request you to please unblock me. — KarmaChameleon ( talk) 13:23, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you can't explain your edits, I can't unblock you. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 21:40, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Can you explain the reasons for your previous edits? — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 14:52, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
I think you will need to agree to not make any edits that criticize Islam, as most (all?) of your edits to date seem to have done. Slatersteven ( talk) 17:07, 30 March 2017 (UTC)