From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why do we need dual spaces?

The concept of dual spaces is used frequently in abstact mathematics, but also has some practical applications. Consider a 2D vector space on which a differentiable function is defined. As an example, can be the Cartesian coordinates of points in a topographic map and can be the ground altitude which varies with the coordinate . According to theory, the infinitesimal change of at the point as a consequenece of changing the position an infintesimal amount is given by

the scalar product between the vector and the gradient of . Clearly, is a scalar and since it is constructed as a linear mapping on , by computing its scalar product with , it follows from the above defintion that is an element of .

From the outset, both vectors and can be seen as elements of . Why is a dual space needed? What is the difference between and in this case?

To see the difference between and , remember that in practice both vectors and must be expressed as a set of three real number which are their coordinates relative to some basis of . Intuitively we may choose to use an orthogonal basis, with normalized basis vectors which are mutually perpendicular. Let be a such a basis for . This means that can be written as

where are the (infinitesimal) coordinates of in the basis . Similiarly, can be written as

where are the coordinates of in the basis . Given that the coordinates of both

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why do we need dual spaces?

The concept of dual spaces is used frequently in abstact mathematics, but also has some practical applications. Consider a 2D vector space on which a differentiable function is defined. As an example, can be the Cartesian coordinates of points in a topographic map and can be the ground altitude which varies with the coordinate . According to theory, the infinitesimal change of at the point as a consequenece of changing the position an infintesimal amount is given by

the scalar product between the vector and the gradient of . Clearly, is a scalar and since it is constructed as a linear mapping on , by computing its scalar product with , it follows from the above defintion that is an element of .

From the outset, both vectors and can be seen as elements of . Why is a dual space needed? What is the difference between and in this case?

To see the difference between and , remember that in practice both vectors and must be expressed as a set of three real number which are their coordinates relative to some basis of . Intuitively we may choose to use an orthogonal basis, with normalized basis vectors which are mutually perpendicular. Let be a such a basis for . This means that can be written as

where are the (infinitesimal) coordinates of in the basis . Similiarly, can be written as

where are the coordinates of in the basis . Given that the coordinates of both


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook