Integral Theory is an area of discourse emerging from the theoretical psychology and philosophy of Ken Wilber, a body of work that has evolved in phases from a transpersonal psychology [1] synthesizing Western and non-Western understandings of consciousness with notions of cosmic, biological, human, and divine evolution [2] into an emerging field of scholarly research focused on the complex interactions of ontology, epistemology, and methodology [3]. It has been claimed to offer a "Theory of Everything" [4] described as a "post-metaphysical" [5] worldview and a "trans-path path" [6] for holistic development; however, the discourse has received limited acceptance in mainstream academia [7] and has been sharply criticized by some for insularity and lack of rigor [8].
Integral Theory (or integral approach [9] [10], consciousness [11], paradigm [12], philosophy [11], society [13], or worldview [11]) has been applied in a variety of different domains: Integral Art, Integral Ecology, Integral Economics, Integral Politics, Integral Psychology, Integral Spirituality, and others. The first interdisciplinary academic conference on Integral Theory took place in 2008 [14]. Integral Theory is said to be situated within Integral studies, described as an emerging interdisciplinary field of discourse [3]. Researchers have also developed applications in areas such as leadership, coaching, and organizational development. [15]
The Integral Institute was co-founded as a non-profit "think-and-practice tank" [16] by Ken Wilber and others in 2001, [17] to promote the theory and its practice. While there is no single organization defining the nature of Integral Theory, some have claimed that a loosely-defined "Integral movement" has appeared, expressed in a variety of conferences, workshops, publications, and blogs focused on themes in integral thought, such as spiritual evolution, and in academic developmental studies programs. [18] Others, however, have denied the existence of a single Integral movement, arguing that such claims conflate radically different phenomena [19].
Integral Theory is an area of discourse emerging from the theoretical psychology and philosophy of Ken Wilber, a body of work that has evolved in phases from a transpersonal psychology [1] synthesizing Western and non-Western understandings of consciousness with notions of cosmic, biological, human, and divine evolution [2] into an emerging field of scholarly research focused on the complex interactions of ontology, epistemology, and methodology [3]. It has been claimed to offer a "Theory of Everything" [4] described as a "post-metaphysical" [5] worldview and a "trans-path path" [6] for holistic development; however, the discourse has received limited acceptance in mainstream academia [7] and has been sharply criticized by some for insularity and lack of rigor [8].
Integral Theory (or integral approach [9] [10], consciousness [11], paradigm [12], philosophy [11], society [13], or worldview [11]) has been applied in a variety of different domains: Integral Art, Integral Ecology, Integral Economics, Integral Politics, Integral Psychology, Integral Spirituality, and others. The first interdisciplinary academic conference on Integral Theory took place in 2008 [14]. Integral Theory is said to be situated within Integral studies, described as an emerging interdisciplinary field of discourse [3]. Researchers have also developed applications in areas such as leadership, coaching, and organizational development. [15]
The Integral Institute was co-founded as a non-profit "think-and-practice tank" [16] by Ken Wilber and others in 2001, [17] to promote the theory and its practice. While there is no single organization defining the nature of Integral Theory, some have claimed that a loosely-defined "Integral movement" has appeared, expressed in a variety of conferences, workshops, publications, and blogs focused on themes in integral thought, such as spiritual evolution, and in academic developmental studies programs. [18] Others, however, have denied the existence of a single Integral movement, arguing that such claims conflate radically different phenomena [19].