This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.

• Name of article: Arts administration
• Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. I was very interesting in how is art administration program is offer in different university.

Guiding questions

• Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
• Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
• Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
• Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

The lead included an introductory sentence that clearly describes the article's topic, and it included a brief description of the article's major sections.

Guiding questions

• Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
• Is the content up-to-date?
• Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

The article's content is relevant to the topic. However, I feel the content should include more detailed information about the curriculum with different university to give reader a border sense of what art administration program offers.

Guiding questions

• Is the article neutral?
• Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
• Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
• Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

The article is very neutral with no claims that is heavily biased toward a particular position.

Guiding questions

• Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
• Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
• Are the sources current?
• Check a few links. Do they work?

The sources in the article is not very clear. It only direct a certain official website without much explanation.

Guiding questions

• Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
• Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
• Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

the article is well organized.

Guiding questions

• Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
• Are images well-captioned?
• Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
• Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

The article didn't include any images that help with understanding of the topic.

Guiding questions

• What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
• How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
• How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

There isn't much information in the talk page, and don't have an article rate. it is a part of WikiProject.

Guiding questions

• What is the article's overall status?
• What are the article's strengths?
• How can the article be improved?
• How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

The article needs a lot improvements overall. The information provided in the article only focus on the what university offers art administration program. However, I believe as a reader to this topic, more information about the what should be included in the curriculum is more important.

• Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~~~~

• Link to feedback: