![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional ResourcesCheck out the Editing Wikipedia PDF for general editing tips and suggestions. |
Iwhitten25
Added information does support the topic, and provides relevant details to further expand the reader's knowledge.
I would recommend adding a superscript where you put the information just because it has specifics like dates and specific numbers, just to make it look more verifiable, and so people can find what reference belongs to this information
The content added is neutral
The source added is recent, as it was published in 2021, which is good because it is up to date.
The content added is easy to read and helps the reader understand what they are reading about; it adds context.
Information about if the program was successful, or what happened in the years after this program was created could be relevant to add.
Could possibly add a picture of the individual talked about in this article, or if there was any propaganda at the time, that could also be added.
![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional ResourcesCheck out the Editing Wikipedia PDF for general editing tips and suggestions. |
Iwhitten25
Added information does support the topic, and provides relevant details to further expand the reader's knowledge.
I would recommend adding a superscript where you put the information just because it has specifics like dates and specific numbers, just to make it look more verifiable, and so people can find what reference belongs to this information
The content added is neutral
The source added is recent, as it was published in 2021, which is good because it is up to date.
The content added is easy to read and helps the reader understand what they are reading about; it adds context.
Information about if the program was successful, or what happened in the years after this program was created could be relevant to add.
Could possibly add a picture of the individual talked about in this article, or if there was any propaganda at the time, that could also be added.