![]() | This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
I still haven't gotten a clue of what information I need to add in the description and this fair use thing. I see everybody else seems to be adding movie and tv screenshots but I don't understand what info and how I add it. I don't understand the templates and how they work. bilttd_biscoi ( talk) 18:54, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
I understand what you mean and take your point on board about the commentry. I just thought it was appropriate and considered it to be almost a fact ,as the show hasn't screened the solution to the mystery yet, so I thought there may be twists that not everybody is going to figure out beforehand? (If you're going to reply, please refrain from any spoilers/your theory, I'm still wondering! :P) EvMark, 15:22, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Okay, thank you for that. Shaln't do that in future. It's so unfortunate that the writers strike is interrupting what I consider to be the strongest season since the first. Even if the strike ended today, it would probably take months before a new episode is aired. Is there any news on whether that's it for now until September. Is Welcome To Kangawa the last of Season 4 or has nothing been confirmed as of yet? —Preceding unsigned comment added by EvMark ( talk • contribs) 15:33, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
You also seemed to have missed my point, because like I said she couldn't be blocked for 3RR. First off, I was not inserting myself into anything, I noticed the war going on and saw how hostile the user was, and she even went as far as accusing another editor of ownership issues. Even if the fourth one is in dispute, she DID have three reverts, which is enough for a warning, so I thought I had better warn her so that in the future she would be less open to edit warring. I also left a message about assuming good faith. However, the editor took this the complete wrong way and acted like I was the bad guy. You've been here a while, and you should know that editors should be discouraged from edit warring, so I hardly think I did anything wrong. -- Scorpion 0422 17:17, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
The all boys club strikes again. Hopefully you'll see this first because you won't like the cigars and steam room buddy buddy sorry lady you're wrong answers. Good luck if you decide to pursue it, I'm done. Tyler's not worth it. KellyAna ( talk) 00:37, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Please do not revert my edits again. I don't know why you think it's vandalism when I am just adding legitimate episodes as listed on TheFutonCritic.com. Unlike most other sites, this one is a very reliable website, as they get everything straight from the source. 24.47.198.164 ( talk) 10:51, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Sorry that I removed the TBAs from Las Vegas episode List but I do believe that if nothing is known about an upcoming episode, than it should not be there. Comicbook30 ( talk) 14:46, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
The following was moved from the Las Vegas talk page as it is not relevant to the discussion and includes questionable claims, personal attacks to other editors, and needs to be checked by an admin:
Let me speak, as a former Wikipedia administrator, that I’m very disappointed in the mess of comments between DJS24, KellyAna, and Irishlass on many pages. Let me mention some info about myself, as I don’t like working under false impressions. I was a Wiki. Admin. for 2 years before my password was hacked and my info was changed a couple of days ago. I worked mainly on TV sites such as the Law and Order franchise. With that, I have never seen such disrupted behavior like this on any discussion page. Now I’m surprised that no admin. has intervened on this issue. Because of that, I have called on some admin to come and discuss this behavior with the three of you. From this point on, I’m not throwing out personal attacks but telling you what I’ve seen of this mess. DJS24 let me start by saying your grammar skills are very weak, as they were mentioned before. Wikipedia is about good articles, and with good articles, comes GOOD grammar. KellyAna, you haven’t once mentioned anything regarding your reasoning on this issue nor your thought process. Instead you’re too busy playing the rules/guidelines queen. How can anyone, especially DJS24, prove a point when you’re only throwing out rules and warnings? Warnings are not to be abused but used when someone is irrational. I’m very upset that, with your irrational behavior, DJS24 has failed to call in for your immediate block. The only reason why DJS24 had to throw out SOME personal attacks is because you were being VERY difficult. The discussion page is for disputes/issues, not to show everyone you know the rules. Irishlass was the only one somewhat civil. As Irishlass and DJS24 are the only two discussing the issue. By the way KellyAna, what is your thesis on this issue? Irishlass, you mentioned that DJS24 was trolling. When instead, he was merely telling people that were discussing the issue to comment. Yes, the Jorja Fox issue is the same thing you’re disputing on this page. Back to DJS24, you need to stay calm and cool, as some of your comments could warrant a block. However, any admin. wouldn’t issue one based on how the people you were talking were acting. Now let me throw in my two cents, as I hope this will resolve the issue. As working on sites for two years, the infoboxes have never contained past characters. Instead they should only contain current information. I’m trying to find the article/discussion page where it was decided on by other admin... In this case the infobox should only contain the current stars, like every other TV show site on Wikipedia. Mentioning other TV sites on this discussion page is not wrong; KellyAna; its proving a point. Now as for the 5 to 1 vote, as you people are calling it, isn’t the way it come to a decision. The people who changed the information before wouldn’t count as votes. As they prob. don’t even know this discussion is happening. Not to mention they prob. don’t even know what the issue is regarding. They gave no reasoning behind their actions. Now when DJS24 gets this message, I’m allowing him to change the stars listed, back to the current stars. Finally let me point out that a discussion page is to prove a point, not to post your position and show the rules. I will be watching this page, as I see anymore more disrupted behavior, I will call in for immediate blocks. P.S. I look forward to working with you Irishlass on the CSI page. In best Regards CARS! -- CarsGm5 ( talk) 04:40, 18 January 2008 (UTC) CarsGm5 ( talk · contribs)
You are in a heated debate with DJS24 that is at this point just generating more anger and upset and is a bunch of pointless Wikidrama. He has reasonable questions that deserve reasonable answers. Don't accuse people of stalking when they look through your contributions, especially when you like to call in admins at the drop of a hat: it is totally reasonable for him to look for that kind of behavior and defend himself. Focus on the infobox issue and the infobox issue alone, and you should be able to work this out. However I have seen you escalating disputes like this before and I'm frankly sick and tired of it: you REALLY need to start following WP:AGF: that is the root of all the problems I've seen you have, and that policy, while it is a common sense suggestion, is really not optional. Take disputes about an article at face value, discuss them in good faith, don't remove talk page comments, and don't comment on the editor, comment on their edits or ideas. Mango juice talk 18:20, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
I know you are busy but I moved part of a conversation from an article talk page to my talk page because a new user is claiming to be an admin. I need your help in figuring this out and what should be done. I find the behaviour to be suspect and the claims of why they are not an admin anylonger suspicious. Can you help. Thanks IrishLass ( talk) 15:00, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
As you can see by my title I love As the World turns and other soap operas. I see your name is on the soap opera project and I thought I would ask if it is possible for me to join the group. I am still quite unexperienced with editing but I would love to help in any way possible. AsTheWorldTurnsFan4Life ( talk) 14:57, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
I am making a Wikiprojects page. I was wondering if you knew how to make a member partcipant box, like the ones you have on your user page on the right side? If anyone else knows how please leave a message. -Blackwatch21. Blackwatch21 ( talk) 14:19, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Is it confirmed she's co-head writing from a reliable source? Is she scab or Fi-Core. Need to know which way to pray, for or against a strike ending. If she's fi-core, doesn't that mean she stays even after the strike? I know a lot of people don't like her but looking at her dates and storyline history, I don't mind what she's done in the past. KellyAna ( talk) 05:18, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Alex Marshall it's in sad sad shape. KellyAna ( talk) 05:46, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Is adding a few equal signs a "radical change"? How does this "change the article's meaning"? I'm grouping relevant information together. I'm flustered by your edit comment. Please elaborate. Thanks, нмŵוτн τ 18:32, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Answer here. — Jhn * 23:10, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Did you miss the episode they appeared in on Las Vegas? YOu don't need a citation, I saw them in the episode, wearing cowboy hats. Ask any fan, trust me you don't need to look around for a "citation". —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robinepowell ( talk • contribs) 02:15, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
At this point I'd say to go back in the history, maybe copy it into your own userspace, and source it there. Then you can reinsert it when it's all sourced. I'm a bit busy with some interviews I'm doing, but if you need help with different areas, let me know. Mike H. Fierce! 20:49, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
I removed the comment based on it had no reference. As for the show being cancelled, I've been hearing that a lot lately. It wouldn't surprise me, as the show only has a 3.9 rating every week. I'm just waiting for a reliable source to make it clear their cancelled, before putting it on the page. Yes, I just noticed Bleek's action, at least the user got blocked. Regards DJS-- DJS24 ( talk) 20:17, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
I saw the notice on your userpage. I hope you can check in now and again on the Garden Grove and PHS articles. Best of luck, Alanraywiki ( talk) 17:17, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. I wonder why you reverted my edit to Degrassi: The Next Generation, regarding the rempoval/insertion of commas in dates. If you are confused about the way in which to format dates, take a look at Wikipedia’s Manual of Style, and in particular WP:DATE. Formatting dates without a comma cause problems for those folk reading articles and who are not logged in. As for Wikipedians who are logged in, they will have set their preferences to their preferred formatting of dates, and so upon reading the article, the edits would not have been noticed. Reformatting dates, spelling and so on "just because" shouldn't happen - they should reflect the nationality of the entire article, or the first major contribution (that was me). Anyway, I'm considering re-formatting them to date-month-year format, which would correctly negate the use of a comma, as Canadian usage allows for either dd/mm/yyyy mm/dd/yyyy. -- Matthew | talk | Contribs 21:01, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
I wasn't the one who decided to put the DVDs alongside the episode listings. Go point the finger somewhere else please. I only changed the title to reflect both items. Robinepowell ( talk) 19:22, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Well I'm glad you have figured out it wasn't me, too bad you didn't check before you made the accusation last week. Robinepowell ( talk) 01:23, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
What's it to you if I removed a reference that I added? I did because I changed it to one from the The Futon Critic, because that one not only list Rosanna Arquette and airdate but an actual title too. Again what's it to you? My reference, my business. Robinepowell ( talk) 19:28, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Then don't BOTHER me! Why start trouble????? If TFC is so bad, why is still being used a reference???? Btw, it's not a reference for the episode title. Robinepowell ( talk) 21:07, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello. Comments about my site were brought to my attention today. Just wanted to go over a few things. I've kept track of the cast credits on "Days of Our Lives" since 1985. Each week the cast is listed by seniority, by the order they sign their contracts. Once in awhile, NBC goofs up, sometimes they even list Frances Reid as Francis or Peggy McCay as McKay, two of my big pet peeves when they do those errors, although recently, they've spelled their names correctly. A lot of contract changes will go unmentioned by the soap press, as you mentioned about Joy Bisco (Gabby). However, she was on contract throughout her entire stay on the show. Now perhaps you may think I made a mistake on that, but then you also had to add this: "Jason is assuming she's on contract as he did with the young lady that played Gabby and he was wrong, generally is." I took exception to that comment, since I pride myself on reporting just the facts of the show, and not any gossip unlike many other sites out there. I will admit in my ten years of running the site, I might average one or two mistakes every two years or so, but that's a pretty good track record for a decade on the Internet. Much better a track record than saying "Jason was wrong, generally is." On another statement you left, just wanted to make a correction on your error. You stated: "Contract status means in the credits everyday, even when you don't air, she is not. She is only listed on days she appears." That is incorrect. Kristen Renton has been listed in the credits every day since December 3, regardless of the weeks she appears in. Many weeks she did not appear in December, January, February and March, yet she was still in the credits every day. If that is not support enough, perhaps when Arianne Zuker (Nicole) is listed in the credits beginning on Thursday, April 3 (since they don't run on April 2 when she debuts), that will be more support. The newest contract actors are: Nadia Bjorlin - Chloe Lane Black...Kristen Renton - Morgan Hollingsworth...Tamara Braun - Ava Vitale...Shawn Christian - Dr. Daniel Jonas...Kevin Dobson - Mickey Horton (I'll admit this is a guess until the 4/1 credits air)...Arianne Zuker - Nicole Walker...Everyone listed up until Arianne Zuker is on contract. She'll be followed by the long-time non-contract vets (Bill & Susan Hayes, Leann Hunley, John Aniston, etc...)
Again not every contract addition/subtraction is mentioned in the soap press. In fact, there have been times when I've seen errors in their magazines as well. As I said above, nobody's perfect. Again, you are entitled to your opinion, but I hope you will reconsider when responding about my site in the future, and think twice before stating that "Jason is generally wrong." I have ten years in this business, so it's unfair to be called that after a decade reporting on "Days" news, 99 percent of the time correct. I forget of it was you or someone else who had mentioned about the actors playing the babies and Theo, but that info came from emails between myself and the show publicist. I don't just make things up at random. Amyrh Harris did appear for one scene on December 26, so that's why I have him listed on the site at the moment. He was the last person to appear in the role. Perhaps Theo won't be seen at all in 2008. Only time will tell. Jason. Jason47a ( talk) 02:57, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
I still haven't gotten a clue of what information I need to add in the description and this fair use thing. I see everybody else seems to be adding movie and tv screenshots but I don't understand what info and how I add it. I don't understand the templates and how they work. bilttd_biscoi ( talk) 18:54, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
I understand what you mean and take your point on board about the commentry. I just thought it was appropriate and considered it to be almost a fact ,as the show hasn't screened the solution to the mystery yet, so I thought there may be twists that not everybody is going to figure out beforehand? (If you're going to reply, please refrain from any spoilers/your theory, I'm still wondering! :P) EvMark, 15:22, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Okay, thank you for that. Shaln't do that in future. It's so unfortunate that the writers strike is interrupting what I consider to be the strongest season since the first. Even if the strike ended today, it would probably take months before a new episode is aired. Is there any news on whether that's it for now until September. Is Welcome To Kangawa the last of Season 4 or has nothing been confirmed as of yet? —Preceding unsigned comment added by EvMark ( talk • contribs) 15:33, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
You also seemed to have missed my point, because like I said she couldn't be blocked for 3RR. First off, I was not inserting myself into anything, I noticed the war going on and saw how hostile the user was, and she even went as far as accusing another editor of ownership issues. Even if the fourth one is in dispute, she DID have three reverts, which is enough for a warning, so I thought I had better warn her so that in the future she would be less open to edit warring. I also left a message about assuming good faith. However, the editor took this the complete wrong way and acted like I was the bad guy. You've been here a while, and you should know that editors should be discouraged from edit warring, so I hardly think I did anything wrong. -- Scorpion 0422 17:17, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
The all boys club strikes again. Hopefully you'll see this first because you won't like the cigars and steam room buddy buddy sorry lady you're wrong answers. Good luck if you decide to pursue it, I'm done. Tyler's not worth it. KellyAna ( talk) 00:37, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Please do not revert my edits again. I don't know why you think it's vandalism when I am just adding legitimate episodes as listed on TheFutonCritic.com. Unlike most other sites, this one is a very reliable website, as they get everything straight from the source. 24.47.198.164 ( talk) 10:51, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Sorry that I removed the TBAs from Las Vegas episode List but I do believe that if nothing is known about an upcoming episode, than it should not be there. Comicbook30 ( talk) 14:46, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
The following was moved from the Las Vegas talk page as it is not relevant to the discussion and includes questionable claims, personal attacks to other editors, and needs to be checked by an admin:
Let me speak, as a former Wikipedia administrator, that I’m very disappointed in the mess of comments between DJS24, KellyAna, and Irishlass on many pages. Let me mention some info about myself, as I don’t like working under false impressions. I was a Wiki. Admin. for 2 years before my password was hacked and my info was changed a couple of days ago. I worked mainly on TV sites such as the Law and Order franchise. With that, I have never seen such disrupted behavior like this on any discussion page. Now I’m surprised that no admin. has intervened on this issue. Because of that, I have called on some admin to come and discuss this behavior with the three of you. From this point on, I’m not throwing out personal attacks but telling you what I’ve seen of this mess. DJS24 let me start by saying your grammar skills are very weak, as they were mentioned before. Wikipedia is about good articles, and with good articles, comes GOOD grammar. KellyAna, you haven’t once mentioned anything regarding your reasoning on this issue nor your thought process. Instead you’re too busy playing the rules/guidelines queen. How can anyone, especially DJS24, prove a point when you’re only throwing out rules and warnings? Warnings are not to be abused but used when someone is irrational. I’m very upset that, with your irrational behavior, DJS24 has failed to call in for your immediate block. The only reason why DJS24 had to throw out SOME personal attacks is because you were being VERY difficult. The discussion page is for disputes/issues, not to show everyone you know the rules. Irishlass was the only one somewhat civil. As Irishlass and DJS24 are the only two discussing the issue. By the way KellyAna, what is your thesis on this issue? Irishlass, you mentioned that DJS24 was trolling. When instead, he was merely telling people that were discussing the issue to comment. Yes, the Jorja Fox issue is the same thing you’re disputing on this page. Back to DJS24, you need to stay calm and cool, as some of your comments could warrant a block. However, any admin. wouldn’t issue one based on how the people you were talking were acting. Now let me throw in my two cents, as I hope this will resolve the issue. As working on sites for two years, the infoboxes have never contained past characters. Instead they should only contain current information. I’m trying to find the article/discussion page where it was decided on by other admin... In this case the infobox should only contain the current stars, like every other TV show site on Wikipedia. Mentioning other TV sites on this discussion page is not wrong; KellyAna; its proving a point. Now as for the 5 to 1 vote, as you people are calling it, isn’t the way it come to a decision. The people who changed the information before wouldn’t count as votes. As they prob. don’t even know this discussion is happening. Not to mention they prob. don’t even know what the issue is regarding. They gave no reasoning behind their actions. Now when DJS24 gets this message, I’m allowing him to change the stars listed, back to the current stars. Finally let me point out that a discussion page is to prove a point, not to post your position and show the rules. I will be watching this page, as I see anymore more disrupted behavior, I will call in for immediate blocks. P.S. I look forward to working with you Irishlass on the CSI page. In best Regards CARS! -- CarsGm5 ( talk) 04:40, 18 January 2008 (UTC) CarsGm5 ( talk · contribs)
You are in a heated debate with DJS24 that is at this point just generating more anger and upset and is a bunch of pointless Wikidrama. He has reasonable questions that deserve reasonable answers. Don't accuse people of stalking when they look through your contributions, especially when you like to call in admins at the drop of a hat: it is totally reasonable for him to look for that kind of behavior and defend himself. Focus on the infobox issue and the infobox issue alone, and you should be able to work this out. However I have seen you escalating disputes like this before and I'm frankly sick and tired of it: you REALLY need to start following WP:AGF: that is the root of all the problems I've seen you have, and that policy, while it is a common sense suggestion, is really not optional. Take disputes about an article at face value, discuss them in good faith, don't remove talk page comments, and don't comment on the editor, comment on their edits or ideas. Mango juice talk 18:20, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
I know you are busy but I moved part of a conversation from an article talk page to my talk page because a new user is claiming to be an admin. I need your help in figuring this out and what should be done. I find the behaviour to be suspect and the claims of why they are not an admin anylonger suspicious. Can you help. Thanks IrishLass ( talk) 15:00, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
As you can see by my title I love As the World turns and other soap operas. I see your name is on the soap opera project and I thought I would ask if it is possible for me to join the group. I am still quite unexperienced with editing but I would love to help in any way possible. AsTheWorldTurnsFan4Life ( talk) 14:57, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
I am making a Wikiprojects page. I was wondering if you knew how to make a member partcipant box, like the ones you have on your user page on the right side? If anyone else knows how please leave a message. -Blackwatch21. Blackwatch21 ( talk) 14:19, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Is it confirmed she's co-head writing from a reliable source? Is she scab or Fi-Core. Need to know which way to pray, for or against a strike ending. If she's fi-core, doesn't that mean she stays even after the strike? I know a lot of people don't like her but looking at her dates and storyline history, I don't mind what she's done in the past. KellyAna ( talk) 05:18, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Alex Marshall it's in sad sad shape. KellyAna ( talk) 05:46, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Is adding a few equal signs a "radical change"? How does this "change the article's meaning"? I'm grouping relevant information together. I'm flustered by your edit comment. Please elaborate. Thanks, нмŵוτн τ 18:32, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Answer here. — Jhn * 23:10, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Did you miss the episode they appeared in on Las Vegas? YOu don't need a citation, I saw them in the episode, wearing cowboy hats. Ask any fan, trust me you don't need to look around for a "citation". —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robinepowell ( talk • contribs) 02:15, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
At this point I'd say to go back in the history, maybe copy it into your own userspace, and source it there. Then you can reinsert it when it's all sourced. I'm a bit busy with some interviews I'm doing, but if you need help with different areas, let me know. Mike H. Fierce! 20:49, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
I removed the comment based on it had no reference. As for the show being cancelled, I've been hearing that a lot lately. It wouldn't surprise me, as the show only has a 3.9 rating every week. I'm just waiting for a reliable source to make it clear their cancelled, before putting it on the page. Yes, I just noticed Bleek's action, at least the user got blocked. Regards DJS-- DJS24 ( talk) 20:17, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
I saw the notice on your userpage. I hope you can check in now and again on the Garden Grove and PHS articles. Best of luck, Alanraywiki ( talk) 17:17, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. I wonder why you reverted my edit to Degrassi: The Next Generation, regarding the rempoval/insertion of commas in dates. If you are confused about the way in which to format dates, take a look at Wikipedia’s Manual of Style, and in particular WP:DATE. Formatting dates without a comma cause problems for those folk reading articles and who are not logged in. As for Wikipedians who are logged in, they will have set their preferences to their preferred formatting of dates, and so upon reading the article, the edits would not have been noticed. Reformatting dates, spelling and so on "just because" shouldn't happen - they should reflect the nationality of the entire article, or the first major contribution (that was me). Anyway, I'm considering re-formatting them to date-month-year format, which would correctly negate the use of a comma, as Canadian usage allows for either dd/mm/yyyy mm/dd/yyyy. -- Matthew | talk | Contribs 21:01, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
I wasn't the one who decided to put the DVDs alongside the episode listings. Go point the finger somewhere else please. I only changed the title to reflect both items. Robinepowell ( talk) 19:22, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Well I'm glad you have figured out it wasn't me, too bad you didn't check before you made the accusation last week. Robinepowell ( talk) 01:23, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
What's it to you if I removed a reference that I added? I did because I changed it to one from the The Futon Critic, because that one not only list Rosanna Arquette and airdate but an actual title too. Again what's it to you? My reference, my business. Robinepowell ( talk) 19:28, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Then don't BOTHER me! Why start trouble????? If TFC is so bad, why is still being used a reference???? Btw, it's not a reference for the episode title. Robinepowell ( talk) 21:07, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello. Comments about my site were brought to my attention today. Just wanted to go over a few things. I've kept track of the cast credits on "Days of Our Lives" since 1985. Each week the cast is listed by seniority, by the order they sign their contracts. Once in awhile, NBC goofs up, sometimes they even list Frances Reid as Francis or Peggy McCay as McKay, two of my big pet peeves when they do those errors, although recently, they've spelled their names correctly. A lot of contract changes will go unmentioned by the soap press, as you mentioned about Joy Bisco (Gabby). However, she was on contract throughout her entire stay on the show. Now perhaps you may think I made a mistake on that, but then you also had to add this: "Jason is assuming she's on contract as he did with the young lady that played Gabby and he was wrong, generally is." I took exception to that comment, since I pride myself on reporting just the facts of the show, and not any gossip unlike many other sites out there. I will admit in my ten years of running the site, I might average one or two mistakes every two years or so, but that's a pretty good track record for a decade on the Internet. Much better a track record than saying "Jason was wrong, generally is." On another statement you left, just wanted to make a correction on your error. You stated: "Contract status means in the credits everyday, even when you don't air, she is not. She is only listed on days she appears." That is incorrect. Kristen Renton has been listed in the credits every day since December 3, regardless of the weeks she appears in. Many weeks she did not appear in December, January, February and March, yet she was still in the credits every day. If that is not support enough, perhaps when Arianne Zuker (Nicole) is listed in the credits beginning on Thursday, April 3 (since they don't run on April 2 when she debuts), that will be more support. The newest contract actors are: Nadia Bjorlin - Chloe Lane Black...Kristen Renton - Morgan Hollingsworth...Tamara Braun - Ava Vitale...Shawn Christian - Dr. Daniel Jonas...Kevin Dobson - Mickey Horton (I'll admit this is a guess until the 4/1 credits air)...Arianne Zuker - Nicole Walker...Everyone listed up until Arianne Zuker is on contract. She'll be followed by the long-time non-contract vets (Bill & Susan Hayes, Leann Hunley, John Aniston, etc...)
Again not every contract addition/subtraction is mentioned in the soap press. In fact, there have been times when I've seen errors in their magazines as well. As I said above, nobody's perfect. Again, you are entitled to your opinion, but I hope you will reconsider when responding about my site in the future, and think twice before stating that "Jason is generally wrong." I have ten years in this business, so it's unfair to be called that after a decade reporting on "Days" news, 99 percent of the time correct. I forget of it was you or someone else who had mentioned about the actors playing the babies and Theo, but that info came from emails between myself and the show publicist. I don't just make things up at random. Amyrh Harris did appear for one scene on December 26, so that's why I have him listed on the site at the moment. He was the last person to appear in the role. Perhaps Theo won't be seen at all in 2008. Only time will tell. Jason. Jason47a ( talk) 02:57, 27 March 2008 (UTC)