Reliable publications include established newspapers, academic journals and books, textbooks, and other published sources with reputations for accuracy and fact-checking.
Unreliable sources include blog posts and other self-published works, press releases, and social media posts.
In order for a source to be considered verifiable, other editors should be able to consult the source.
Is the source independent of the subject?
Is the source connected in any way to the subject? This is especially important when writing biographies or about organizations.
For example, if you were writing a biography, sources like the person's webpage or personal blog would not be considered independent.
Is the source primary or secondary?
Primary sources include first-hand accounts, autobiographies, and other original content.
Wikipedia allows limited use of primary sources, but typically only for straightforward, descriptive statements of facts, and only if they are published and verifiable without requiring specialized knowledge.
Secondary sources should be the main basis for a biography on Wikipedia.
If you're working on a topic related to medicine or psychology, ensure that your sources follow
these special guidelines.
If you're creating a new article, consider the following:
Ensure that your topic meets Wikipedia's
notability guidelines.
In order for a topic to meet the notability requirement, you must be able to identify 2-3 sources that are reliable, verifiable, and independent of the subject you're writing about.
Finding sufficient sources to establish notability can be especially hard when writing about people or organizations.
Sources that are not independent of the subject might be useful additions, but don't count towards the notability requirement.
Wikipedia has developed special guidelines for writing about
living persons. Please follow these carefully.
Wikipedia has a series of
guidelines for writing about different categories of people, such as academics and artists. If you're trying to create a new entry about a living person, please look at these carefully.
If you're not sure whether a source is reliable, ask a librarian! If you have questions about Wikipedia's sourcing rules, you can use the Get Help button below to contact your Wikipedia Expert.
This is where you will compile the bibliography for your Wikipedia assignment. Add the name and/or notes about what each source covers, then use the "Cite" button to generate the citation for that source.
Example: Luke, Learie. 2007. Identity and secession in the Caribbean: Tobago versus Trinidad, 1889–1980.[1]
This is a book published by a university press, so it should be a reliable source. It also covers the topic in some depth, so it's helpful in establishing notability.
Example: Galeano, Gloria; Bernal, Rodrigo (2013-11-08). "Sabinaria , a new genus of palms (Cryosophileae, Coryphoideae, Arecaceae) from the Colombia-Panama border". Phytotaxa.[2]
This is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, so it should be a reliable source. It covers the topic in some depth, so it's helpful in establishing notability.
Example: Baker, William J.; Dransfield, John (2016). "Beyond Genera Palmarum: progress and prospects in palm systematics". Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society.[3]
This is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, so it should be a reliable source for a specific fact. Since it only dedicates a few sentences to the topic, it can't be used to establish notability.
Jin et al. 2013 "B-cell linker protein expression contributes to controlling allergic and autoimmune diseases by mediating IL-10 production in regulatory B cells"[4]
This is a peer-reviewed scientific journal. It's a primary source, with links to several other sources.
This study used BLNK-deficient mouse CD1dhiCD5+ spleen cells to investigate intracellular signaling pathways and cytokine production. Contact hypersensitivity and experimental autimmune encephalomyelitis were used as endpoints.
The authors found that BLNK had an important role in IL-10 production and therefore B10 function.
Geahlen 2009 "Syk and pTyr'd: Signaling through the B cell antigen receptor" [5]
I'm a little dubious about this journal, it only has an impact factor of 5.011.
It is a review article about the B cell receptor. It could be useful for talking about phosphorylation of the B cell linker protein.
Mizuno et al. 2000 "Src Homology Region 2 (SH2) Domain-Containing Phosphatase-1 Dephosphorylates B Cell Linker Protein/SH2 Domain Leukocyte Protein of 65 kDa and Selectively Regulates c-Jun NH2-Terminal Kinase Activation in B Cells" [6]
This peer-reviewed primary article was listed in the further reading section of my Wikipedia article
It talks about the dephosphorylation of B cell linker protein
Hendriks et al 2005 "Involvement of SLP-65 and Btk in tumor suppression and malignant transformation of pre-B cells" [7]
This is a peer-reviewed review article
It talks about the relationship between Btk and BLNK
Figure 1 is a nice model
Tumor suppressor role could be an additional section in the article if I can find enough notability/different sources talking about it
Herzog, Storch, Jumaa 2006 "Dual role of the adaptor protein SLP-65" [8]
This is a peer-reviewed review article
However, I'm not super enthralled with the journal
Could be useful in tumor suppressor role
References
^Luke, Learie B. (2007). Identity and secession in the Caribbean: Tobago versus Trinidad, 1889–1980. Kingston, Jamaica: University of the West Indies Press.
ISBN978-9766401993.
OCLC646844096.
^Galeano, Gloria; Bernal, Rodrigo (2013-11-08). "Sabinaria , a new genus of palms (Cryosophileae, Coryphoideae, Arecaceae) from the Colombia-Panama border". Phytotaxa. 144 (2): 27–44.
doi:
10.11646/phytotaxa.144.2.1.
ISSN1179-3163.
Reliable publications include established newspapers, academic journals and books, textbooks, and other published sources with reputations for accuracy and fact-checking.
Unreliable sources include blog posts and other self-published works, press releases, and social media posts.
In order for a source to be considered verifiable, other editors should be able to consult the source.
Is the source independent of the subject?
Is the source connected in any way to the subject? This is especially important when writing biographies or about organizations.
For example, if you were writing a biography, sources like the person's webpage or personal blog would not be considered independent.
Is the source primary or secondary?
Primary sources include first-hand accounts, autobiographies, and other original content.
Wikipedia allows limited use of primary sources, but typically only for straightforward, descriptive statements of facts, and only if they are published and verifiable without requiring specialized knowledge.
Secondary sources should be the main basis for a biography on Wikipedia.
If you're working on a topic related to medicine or psychology, ensure that your sources follow
these special guidelines.
If you're creating a new article, consider the following:
Ensure that your topic meets Wikipedia's
notability guidelines.
In order for a topic to meet the notability requirement, you must be able to identify 2-3 sources that are reliable, verifiable, and independent of the subject you're writing about.
Finding sufficient sources to establish notability can be especially hard when writing about people or organizations.
Sources that are not independent of the subject might be useful additions, but don't count towards the notability requirement.
Wikipedia has developed special guidelines for writing about
living persons. Please follow these carefully.
Wikipedia has a series of
guidelines for writing about different categories of people, such as academics and artists. If you're trying to create a new entry about a living person, please look at these carefully.
If you're not sure whether a source is reliable, ask a librarian! If you have questions about Wikipedia's sourcing rules, you can use the Get Help button below to contact your Wikipedia Expert.
This is where you will compile the bibliography for your Wikipedia assignment. Add the name and/or notes about what each source covers, then use the "Cite" button to generate the citation for that source.
Example: Luke, Learie. 2007. Identity and secession in the Caribbean: Tobago versus Trinidad, 1889–1980.[1]
This is a book published by a university press, so it should be a reliable source. It also covers the topic in some depth, so it's helpful in establishing notability.
Example: Galeano, Gloria; Bernal, Rodrigo (2013-11-08). "Sabinaria , a new genus of palms (Cryosophileae, Coryphoideae, Arecaceae) from the Colombia-Panama border". Phytotaxa.[2]
This is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, so it should be a reliable source. It covers the topic in some depth, so it's helpful in establishing notability.
Example: Baker, William J.; Dransfield, John (2016). "Beyond Genera Palmarum: progress and prospects in palm systematics". Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society.[3]
This is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, so it should be a reliable source for a specific fact. Since it only dedicates a few sentences to the topic, it can't be used to establish notability.
Jin et al. 2013 "B-cell linker protein expression contributes to controlling allergic and autoimmune diseases by mediating IL-10 production in regulatory B cells"[4]
This is a peer-reviewed scientific journal. It's a primary source, with links to several other sources.
This study used BLNK-deficient mouse CD1dhiCD5+ spleen cells to investigate intracellular signaling pathways and cytokine production. Contact hypersensitivity and experimental autimmune encephalomyelitis were used as endpoints.
The authors found that BLNK had an important role in IL-10 production and therefore B10 function.
Geahlen 2009 "Syk and pTyr'd: Signaling through the B cell antigen receptor" [5]
I'm a little dubious about this journal, it only has an impact factor of 5.011.
It is a review article about the B cell receptor. It could be useful for talking about phosphorylation of the B cell linker protein.
Mizuno et al. 2000 "Src Homology Region 2 (SH2) Domain-Containing Phosphatase-1 Dephosphorylates B Cell Linker Protein/SH2 Domain Leukocyte Protein of 65 kDa and Selectively Regulates c-Jun NH2-Terminal Kinase Activation in B Cells" [6]
This peer-reviewed primary article was listed in the further reading section of my Wikipedia article
It talks about the dephosphorylation of B cell linker protein
Hendriks et al 2005 "Involvement of SLP-65 and Btk in tumor suppression and malignant transformation of pre-B cells" [7]
This is a peer-reviewed review article
It talks about the relationship between Btk and BLNK
Figure 1 is a nice model
Tumor suppressor role could be an additional section in the article if I can find enough notability/different sources talking about it
Herzog, Storch, Jumaa 2006 "Dual role of the adaptor protein SLP-65" [8]
This is a peer-reviewed review article
However, I'm not super enthralled with the journal
Could be useful in tumor suppressor role
References
^Luke, Learie B. (2007). Identity and secession in the Caribbean: Tobago versus Trinidad, 1889–1980. Kingston, Jamaica: University of the West Indies Press.
ISBN978-9766401993.
OCLC646844096.
^Galeano, Gloria; Bernal, Rodrigo (2013-11-08). "Sabinaria , a new genus of palms (Cryosophileae, Coryphoideae, Arecaceae) from the Colombia-Panama border". Phytotaxa. 144 (2): 27–44.
doi:
10.11646/phytotaxa.144.2.1.
ISSN1179-3163.