Options for new sources:
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-26127-0_9
http://galileo.rice.edu/sci/brahe.html
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Tycho-Brahe-Danish-astronomer
https://www.famousscientists.org/tycho-brahe/
Most of these sources are directly related to Tycho and may not have much information on Sophia.
HopeDrennan ( talk) 20:12, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
The observatory that was built in Hven was given the name of
Uraniborg, which became one of Europe’s finest observatories.
[1]
It can be said that the work that Sophia Brahe assisted her brother in laid the groundwork for Sir
Isaac Newton.
[2]
Tycho and his assistants, which included Sophia, watched the orbits of planetary bodies, rather than the locations alone.
[3]
To edit and add to the Wikipedia article, I want to rearrange and round out the current life tab with more information and citations and then add a section/more information on the poem about Sophia by her brother Tycho.
Urania Titani was a poem written by Tycho Brahe, the brother of Sophia, about a fictional love correspondence between Sophia and Erik. [4] Tycho wrote the poem in Latin, a language Sophia was not fluent in. [5] In the poem, Tycho represents Sophia as Urania, the Muse of astronomy in Greek mythology, and Erik as a Titan, a son of Uranus (mythology). [6] Sophia is depicted as longing for her husband while he studied abroad to study alchemy. [7] This work established the co-dependence that Sophia and Tycho maintained, including their similar beliefs. [8] Lastly, the poem was a large indicator of Tycho publicizing his bond with his sister, establishing himself as a Renaissance man and unashamed of his work with his sister.
Sophia is well known for her work in genealogy. Sophia's first work was completed in 1600. [9] During this time, genealogy was placed in documents called family books. These books contained many aspects of the family's life such as family members, traditions, and different family branches. [10] In Sophia's renditions of her family book she included letters and correspondence with other women concerning their interwoven heritage and possible relatives. Sophia also included anecdotes from her family and rarely placed her own comments within her works. [11] Sophia's work was common among women during her time, as women were valued for their penmanship and ability to maintain their households. [12]
Sophie, along with her brother Tycho, have come to represent the flowering of letters and science during the Danish Renaissance. She worked closely with her brother in his scientific endeavors and is thought to have acted as his muse. Indeed the two were so close that poet Johan L. Heiberg admonished that "Denmark must never forget the noble woman who, in spirit much more than flesh and blood, was Tycho Brahe's sister; the shining star in our Danish heaven is indeed a double one." [13] In 1626 Sophie had completed a 900-page manuscript on the genealogies of 60 Danish noble families, which is held by Lund University. [14] [15]
Sophia Brahe studied horticulture and chemistry. Initially, Tycho Brahe advised her to avoid studying astronomy; however Sophia persisted and studied the subject on her own time and own resources. [16] The work that Sophia aided her brother in is now seen as the basis of modern orbit predictions of the planets and solar system. [17] The Island of Hven, sometimes referred to as Ven (Sweden), is where many of these observations took place. In the Hven Observatory, Tycho and Sophia collected the most accurate measurements to date (prior to the telescope invention) of the positions of the planets with respect to time. [18] Tycho Brahe is generally known for the devices and instruments that he made which aided in the observations. Sophia, on the other hand, had a key role in performing the observations themselves. [19] A monumental discovery that was made by the Brahe siblings was the new star, known as Tycho's Supernova. [20] The official scentific name of the Supernova is SN 1572. Tycho's Supernova was a controversial discovery which waviered peoples faith due to it being the first evidence found showing that the Earth is not at the center of the universe. [21]
Once some major observations were made by the Brahes, Tycho requested money from King Frederick II of Denmark,
Frederick the Great, to move forward with more observation facilities in Hven.
[22] The king was under the impression that the observatories were for Tycho and his personal research; however it is known that some of the observatories were made for Sophia to work in for her own observations.
[23] Much of the data that was gathered throughout Tycho's life was passed down to his pupil,
Johannes Kepler, rather than his sister, Sophia Brahe.
[24]
As one can see Sophia was interested more in hands on experience and observations rather than experimenting. This really shines true during her marriage. Sophia remarried to Erik Lange in 1602. Lange was known for his study in
Alchemy, but this was nothing of interest to Sophia. While trying to make them rich, Lange spent all the couple's money to no avail. They ended up living in extreme poverty.
[25]
HopeDrennan ( talk) 19:05, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Cjl4kd ( talk) 16:04, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
https://www.schoolsobservatory.org/learn/careers/astronomy/astrowomen/Brahe
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Tycho-Brahe-Danish-astronomer
HopeDrennan ( talk) 18:34, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Peer Review By Logan Bader for Sophia Brahe 1. What does the draft do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way?
The draft is well set up and discusses on a personal and professional level the bond that Sophia and her brother Tycho had. The addition of discussing the Urania Titani poem impressed me because it really brings home the appreciation that Tycho had for his sister. I really like this line “Sophia Brahe was well versed in horticulture and chemistry. Initially, Tycho Brahe advised her to avoid studying astronomy; however, Sophia persisted and studied the subject on her own time and own resources” as it shows how persistent Sophia was and is backed up by a good source.
2. What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement?
One thing I would recommend avoiding is the use of “______ is well known for” or “_________ was well versed” as it almost sounds like an opinion. I think saying that “____ studied _____ and _____” presents a more Wikipedia appropriate phrasing. This would help with reading without thinking bias may be present.
3. What’s the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?
I think expanding your sources and citations will help others who are really interested to go down the rabbit hole of information for further research. Also I think adding inner-Wikipedia links to other pages will allow for the best integration into the Wikipedia workspace.
4. Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know! Your article discussed the legacy that Sophia left and the impact it had on the later generations which I think would be a good thing for me to expand upon in my article. My Thanks!
Labzq3 ( talk) 15:47, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
What else could be improved?
Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
HopeDrennan ( talk) 02:44, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Why did you choose this article?
What's missing?
What do you want to add?
Outside Sources
wiki HopeDrennan ( talk) 16:51, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
Adding information to her Wiki Page: "Later in Sophia's life, in 1626, she published one of her first major pieces regarding the Danish noble families genealogy. Her research of the Danish history spanned 900 pages. [26] This work is still used today for historical purposes"
HopeDrennan ( talk) 19:58, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
"In Zealand, she lived specifically in Elsinore where she worked primarily on horticulture and healing plants. [27]
HopeDrennan ( talk) 16:37, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Sophia Brahe Sophie Brahe personally financed the restoration of the local church, Ivetofta kyrka. She planned to be buried there, and the lid for her unused sarcophagus remains in the church's armory (Svensson, et al.). But, by 1616 she had moved permanently to Zealand and settled in Helsingør. In Zealand, she lived specifically in Elsinore where she worked primarily on horticulture and healing plants. [28] She spent her last years writing up the genealogy of Danish noble families, publishing the first major version in 1626 (there were later additions). Her work is still considered a major source for early history of Danish nobility (Det Kongelige Bibliotek). She died in Helsingør in the year 1643, [14] and was buried in the Torrlösa old church (in the village of Torrlösa, east of the town of Landskrona in what was then Denmark but now is southern Sweden. That church housed a burial chapel for the Thott family that remained for some time even after the church itself was pulled down in the mid-19th century (the new Torrlösa church was built nearby). Currently, a stone setting marks the outlines of the Thott chapel, while the tombstone for Sophie Brahe is still standing on the site. (from March 8, 2019)
User:Elwgxf/sandbox HopeDrennan ( talk) 01:18, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Options for new sources:
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-26127-0_9
http://galileo.rice.edu/sci/brahe.html
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Tycho-Brahe-Danish-astronomer
https://www.famousscientists.org/tycho-brahe/
Most of these sources are directly related to Tycho and may not have much information on Sophia.
HopeDrennan ( talk) 20:12, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
The observatory that was built in Hven was given the name of
Uraniborg, which became one of Europe’s finest observatories.
[1]
It can be said that the work that Sophia Brahe assisted her brother in laid the groundwork for Sir
Isaac Newton.
[2]
Tycho and his assistants, which included Sophia, watched the orbits of planetary bodies, rather than the locations alone.
[3]
To edit and add to the Wikipedia article, I want to rearrange and round out the current life tab with more information and citations and then add a section/more information on the poem about Sophia by her brother Tycho.
Urania Titani was a poem written by Tycho Brahe, the brother of Sophia, about a fictional love correspondence between Sophia and Erik. [4] Tycho wrote the poem in Latin, a language Sophia was not fluent in. [5] In the poem, Tycho represents Sophia as Urania, the Muse of astronomy in Greek mythology, and Erik as a Titan, a son of Uranus (mythology). [6] Sophia is depicted as longing for her husband while he studied abroad to study alchemy. [7] This work established the co-dependence that Sophia and Tycho maintained, including their similar beliefs. [8] Lastly, the poem was a large indicator of Tycho publicizing his bond with his sister, establishing himself as a Renaissance man and unashamed of his work with his sister.
Sophia is well known for her work in genealogy. Sophia's first work was completed in 1600. [9] During this time, genealogy was placed in documents called family books. These books contained many aspects of the family's life such as family members, traditions, and different family branches. [10] In Sophia's renditions of her family book she included letters and correspondence with other women concerning their interwoven heritage and possible relatives. Sophia also included anecdotes from her family and rarely placed her own comments within her works. [11] Sophia's work was common among women during her time, as women were valued for their penmanship and ability to maintain their households. [12]
Sophie, along with her brother Tycho, have come to represent the flowering of letters and science during the Danish Renaissance. She worked closely with her brother in his scientific endeavors and is thought to have acted as his muse. Indeed the two were so close that poet Johan L. Heiberg admonished that "Denmark must never forget the noble woman who, in spirit much more than flesh and blood, was Tycho Brahe's sister; the shining star in our Danish heaven is indeed a double one." [13] In 1626 Sophie had completed a 900-page manuscript on the genealogies of 60 Danish noble families, which is held by Lund University. [14] [15]
Sophia Brahe studied horticulture and chemistry. Initially, Tycho Brahe advised her to avoid studying astronomy; however Sophia persisted and studied the subject on her own time and own resources. [16] The work that Sophia aided her brother in is now seen as the basis of modern orbit predictions of the planets and solar system. [17] The Island of Hven, sometimes referred to as Ven (Sweden), is where many of these observations took place. In the Hven Observatory, Tycho and Sophia collected the most accurate measurements to date (prior to the telescope invention) of the positions of the planets with respect to time. [18] Tycho Brahe is generally known for the devices and instruments that he made which aided in the observations. Sophia, on the other hand, had a key role in performing the observations themselves. [19] A monumental discovery that was made by the Brahe siblings was the new star, known as Tycho's Supernova. [20] The official scentific name of the Supernova is SN 1572. Tycho's Supernova was a controversial discovery which waviered peoples faith due to it being the first evidence found showing that the Earth is not at the center of the universe. [21]
Once some major observations were made by the Brahes, Tycho requested money from King Frederick II of Denmark,
Frederick the Great, to move forward with more observation facilities in Hven.
[22] The king was under the impression that the observatories were for Tycho and his personal research; however it is known that some of the observatories were made for Sophia to work in for her own observations.
[23] Much of the data that was gathered throughout Tycho's life was passed down to his pupil,
Johannes Kepler, rather than his sister, Sophia Brahe.
[24]
As one can see Sophia was interested more in hands on experience and observations rather than experimenting. This really shines true during her marriage. Sophia remarried to Erik Lange in 1602. Lange was known for his study in
Alchemy, but this was nothing of interest to Sophia. While trying to make them rich, Lange spent all the couple's money to no avail. They ended up living in extreme poverty.
[25]
HopeDrennan ( talk) 19:05, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Cjl4kd ( talk) 16:04, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
https://www.schoolsobservatory.org/learn/careers/astronomy/astrowomen/Brahe
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Tycho-Brahe-Danish-astronomer
HopeDrennan ( talk) 18:34, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Peer Review By Logan Bader for Sophia Brahe 1. What does the draft do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way?
The draft is well set up and discusses on a personal and professional level the bond that Sophia and her brother Tycho had. The addition of discussing the Urania Titani poem impressed me because it really brings home the appreciation that Tycho had for his sister. I really like this line “Sophia Brahe was well versed in horticulture and chemistry. Initially, Tycho Brahe advised her to avoid studying astronomy; however, Sophia persisted and studied the subject on her own time and own resources” as it shows how persistent Sophia was and is backed up by a good source.
2. What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement?
One thing I would recommend avoiding is the use of “______ is well known for” or “_________ was well versed” as it almost sounds like an opinion. I think saying that “____ studied _____ and _____” presents a more Wikipedia appropriate phrasing. This would help with reading without thinking bias may be present.
3. What’s the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?
I think expanding your sources and citations will help others who are really interested to go down the rabbit hole of information for further research. Also I think adding inner-Wikipedia links to other pages will allow for the best integration into the Wikipedia workspace.
4. Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know! Your article discussed the legacy that Sophia left and the impact it had on the later generations which I think would be a good thing for me to expand upon in my article. My Thanks!
Labzq3 ( talk) 15:47, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
What else could be improved?
Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
HopeDrennan ( talk) 02:44, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Why did you choose this article?
What's missing?
What do you want to add?
Outside Sources
wiki HopeDrennan ( talk) 16:51, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
Adding information to her Wiki Page: "Later in Sophia's life, in 1626, she published one of her first major pieces regarding the Danish noble families genealogy. Her research of the Danish history spanned 900 pages. [26] This work is still used today for historical purposes"
HopeDrennan ( talk) 19:58, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
"In Zealand, she lived specifically in Elsinore where she worked primarily on horticulture and healing plants. [27]
HopeDrennan ( talk) 16:37, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Sophia Brahe Sophie Brahe personally financed the restoration of the local church, Ivetofta kyrka. She planned to be buried there, and the lid for her unused sarcophagus remains in the church's armory (Svensson, et al.). But, by 1616 she had moved permanently to Zealand and settled in Helsingør. In Zealand, she lived specifically in Elsinore where she worked primarily on horticulture and healing plants. [28] She spent her last years writing up the genealogy of Danish noble families, publishing the first major version in 1626 (there were later additions). Her work is still considered a major source for early history of Danish nobility (Det Kongelige Bibliotek). She died in Helsingør in the year 1643, [14] and was buried in the Torrlösa old church (in the village of Torrlösa, east of the town of Landskrona in what was then Denmark but now is southern Sweden. That church housed a burial chapel for the Thott family that remained for some time even after the church itself was pulled down in the mid-19th century (the new Torrlösa church was built nearby). Currently, a stone setting marks the outlines of the Thott chapel, while the tombstone for Sophie Brahe is still standing on the site. (from March 8, 2019)
User:Elwgxf/sandbox HopeDrennan ( talk) 01:18, 11 March 2019 (UTC)