 | Evaluate an article
Complete your article evaluation below. Here are the key aspects to consider: Lead sectionA good lead section defines the topic and provides a concise overview. A reader who just wants to identify the topic can read the first sentence. A reader who wants a very brief overview of the most important things about it can read the first paragraph. A reader who wants a quick overview can read the whole lead section.
ContentA good Wikipedia article should cover all the important aspects of a topic, without putting too much weight on one part while neglecting another.
Tone and BalanceWikipedia articles should be written from a neutral point of view; if there are substantial differences of interpretation or controversies among published, reliable sources, those views should be described as fairly as possible.
Sources and ReferencesA Wikipedia article should be based on the best sources available for the topic at hand. When possible, this means academic and peer-reviewed publications or scholarly books.
Organization and writing qualityThe writing should be clear and professional, the content should be organized sensibly into sections.
Images and Media
Talk page discussionThe article's talk page — and any discussions among other Wikipedia editors that have been taking place there — can be a useful window into the state of an article, and might help you focus on important aspects that you didn't think of.
Overall impressions
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved. |
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)
It's an important process in the regulation of cell cycle and a good understanding of it helps with current studies on treatment of diseases such as cancer. My preliminary impression was it is good introductory of the what cell death is but I think there could be improvements that can be done such as addition of different pathways a cell undergo which induces cell death.
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)
- Lead section: The article contains a brief and concise introductory lead sentence. However, the paragraph can be improved as to writing and discussing a brief description of the major sections.
- Content: Content is relevant to the topic but could be improved by adding a few more details on the events occurring leading to cell death and the different cell death pathways.
- Tone and Balance: The tone of the article is neutral
- Sources and References: In addition to the listed sources, recent resources could be used citing a more recent study/journal about the topic.
- Organization and Writing Quality: The article is easy to read, no spelling errors and are separated into sections.
- Images and Media: Images on the different pathways inducing cell death could be added on top of what was included in the article.
- Talk Page: I only found 2 conversations in the Talk page and more so addition of images on a specific cell death pathway.
- Overall Impression: The article is overall an introductory of cell death and some of the different types. It could be improved with adding pathways inducing cell death and connecting some of the diseases that could occur due to bypassing this regulation process.
| Evaluate an article
Complete your article evaluation below. Here are the key aspects to consider: Lead sectionA good lead section defines the topic and provides a concise overview. A reader who just wants to identify the topic can read the first sentence. A reader who wants a very brief overview of the most important things about it can read the first paragraph. A reader who wants a quick overview can read the whole lead section.
ContentA good Wikipedia article should cover all the important aspects of a topic, without putting too much weight on one part while neglecting another.
Tone and BalanceWikipedia articles should be written from a neutral point of view; if there are substantial differences of interpretation or controversies among published, reliable sources, those views should be described as fairly as possible.
Sources and ReferencesA Wikipedia article should be based on the best sources available for the topic at hand. When possible, this means academic and peer-reviewed publications or scholarly books.
Organization and writing qualityThe writing should be clear and professional, the content should be organized sensibly into sections.
Images and Media
Talk page discussionThe article's talk page — and any discussions among other Wikipedia editors that have been taking place there — can be a useful window into the state of an article, and might help you focus on important aspects that you didn't think of.
Overall impressions
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved. |
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)
It's an important process in the regulation of cell cycle and a good understanding of it helps with current studies on treatment of diseases such as cancer. My preliminary impression was it is good introductory of the what cell death is but I think there could be improvements that can be done such as addition of different pathways a cell undergo which induces cell death.
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)
- Lead section: The article contains a brief and concise introductory lead sentence. However, the paragraph can be improved as to writing and discussing a brief description of the major sections.
- Content: Content is relevant to the topic but could be improved by adding a few more details on the events occurring leading to cell death and the different cell death pathways.
- Tone and Balance: The tone of the article is neutral
- Sources and References: In addition to the listed sources, recent resources could be used citing a more recent study/journal about the topic.
- Organization and Writing Quality: The article is easy to read, no spelling errors and are separated into sections.
- Images and Media: Images on the different pathways inducing cell death could be added on top of what was included in the article.
- Talk Page: I only found 2 conversations in the Talk page and more so addition of images on a specific cell death pathway.
- Overall Impression: The article is overall an introductory of cell death and some of the different types. It could be improved with adding pathways inducing cell death and connecting some of the diseases that could occur due to bypassing this regulation process.