You still don't get that you did notify me for some reason. I still would like an answer. I do want to talk to you, but under your IP you just remove it anyway, as well as removing my argument of why it shouldn't be there on the article's talk page - something you CAN get blocked for. A good Wikipedian would not do that. Your IP history is filled with blatant vandalism, which sometimes removes it if it doesn't work the way you'd like to. And if I am mistaken that it, in fact, isn't your IP, I take back that statement. But, it can be proved that it is your IP, if it in fact is. That 'bugs' section got reinstated three months ago and I stopped patrolling it. "Checked it lately? Look at it." That b.s., man. There was no reason to do that other than to starting an edit war you know you'll win. You're annoyed that it's now November and I, again, am trying to remove it - your fault, sir. By advising me of looking at the article, you knew that I would attempt to take it down. This time, I will try to have it removed. Socby19 ( talk) 20:00, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Yes, as a user I have the right to know what's going on for (almost) every page that is on Wikipedia. But if I had interest, I would check for myself on my own decision. Telling me about it after I haven't bothered to look at it after three months - (f)lame. Socby19 ( talk) 22:20, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
I do in fact, myself have evidence that you are the IP. And no, you have not told me why you posted "Checked it lately? Look at it." Socby19 ( talk) 20:45, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/HPJoker for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Socby19 ( talk) 20:54, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
You still don't get that you did notify me for some reason. I still would like an answer. I do want to talk to you, but under your IP you just remove it anyway, as well as removing my argument of why it shouldn't be there on the article's talk page - something you CAN get blocked for. A good Wikipedian would not do that. Your IP history is filled with blatant vandalism, which sometimes removes it if it doesn't work the way you'd like to. And if I am mistaken that it, in fact, isn't your IP, I take back that statement. But, it can be proved that it is your IP, if it in fact is. That 'bugs' section got reinstated three months ago and I stopped patrolling it. "Checked it lately? Look at it." That b.s., man. There was no reason to do that other than to starting an edit war you know you'll win. You're annoyed that it's now November and I, again, am trying to remove it - your fault, sir. By advising me of looking at the article, you knew that I would attempt to take it down. This time, I will try to have it removed. Socby19 ( talk) 20:00, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Yes, as a user I have the right to know what's going on for (almost) every page that is on Wikipedia. But if I had interest, I would check for myself on my own decision. Telling me about it after I haven't bothered to look at it after three months - (f)lame. Socby19 ( talk) 22:20, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
I do in fact, myself have evidence that you are the IP. And no, you have not told me why you posted "Checked it lately? Look at it." Socby19 ( talk) 20:45, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/HPJoker for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Socby19 ( talk) 20:54, 19 November 2007 (UTC)