![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
Shakera Patterson
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)
Shrine and Mausoleums section:
The information is clearly written, is unbiased, and well-formatted. The information highlights more information about shrines and mausoleums in Islamic Cairo, which is an underrepresented and underdeveloped subject on Wikipedia. The article is now more complete because of the added information, and very much positively contributed to art historical perspectives within this article.
One thing that needs to be edited is that there are no citations imbedded into the wikipedia article. I suggest that the author goes through their edits and adds citations after each sentence/piece of newly introduced information. Otherwise I am unsure that their edits will be accepted by Wikipedia.
Well done! Very imformative.
![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
Shakera Patterson
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)
Shrine and Mausoleums section:
The information is clearly written, is unbiased, and well-formatted. The information highlights more information about shrines and mausoleums in Islamic Cairo, which is an underrepresented and underdeveloped subject on Wikipedia. The article is now more complete because of the added information, and very much positively contributed to art historical perspectives within this article.
One thing that needs to be edited is that there are no citations imbedded into the wikipedia article. I suggest that the author goes through their edits and adds citations after each sentence/piece of newly introduced information. Otherwise I am unsure that their edits will be accepted by Wikipedia.
Well done! Very imformative.