wdwd | |||
wdwa | |||
General Punger talk 23:53, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
//Lol/Wisimifsimso
~~~~ SIGNATURE DOES NOT WORK IN VISUAL EDITOR
General Punger talk 23:04, 21 January 2021 (UTC) General Punger talk 23:04, 21 January 2021 (UTC) 23:04, 21 January 2021 (UTC) General Punger talk
aA 'A' |A| "GeneralPunger" ( GeneralPunger ( talk) 12:14, 5 August 2015 (UTC))
egesrhdrtfhxedht
ee
BOLD BOLDITALIC ITALIC UNDERLINEITALIC eFERereadawsdawd
ded Last revision of hounding:
Eti15TrSf ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Back in September, an image was replaced on New York City Subway. Eti15TrSf decided to step in and revert it three months later with accusations of self-promotion, along with " you are not entitled to have your pictures used everywhere". The image replacement in question is subjectively better at first glance. The issue being had here is that instead of going to the talk page to discuss said image, Eti15TrSf persisted in their accusations of bad faith. @ GeneralPunger:, can you add your context to this? Cards 84664 03:30, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
We need more evidence for a pattern but Eti15TrSf very clearly targeted GeneralPunger's image here based on an unsupported claim of "self-promotion" (how, exactly?). I don't know that you can call it a content dispute; GeneralPunger's image is clearly better than the one it replaced (in terms of exposure and color). It's not remotely a close call, and no else agreed with the edit. Eti15TrSf themselves knew it was a good image because they added it to R46 (New York City Subway car) in July. Fundamentally this is a user conduct issue because Eti15TrSf is targeting GeneralPunger, and he should probably stop doing that. Mackensen (talk) 12:44, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
TEST
R32 (New York City SwdawdawdawdawdawdUUUUU
[[File:NYCS-bull-trans-{{{service}}}.svg|65px|"{{{service}}}" train symbol]] R68 N train at 39th Avenue | |
![]() | |
[[file:NYCS map {{{service}}}.svg|250px|Map of the "{{{service}}}" train]] |
This is a Test
e | Test | C | L |
---|---|---|---|
Frey | W | Nv | X |
Zach | F | Or | V |
Card | C | DB | V |
ṣṢṡṩỰṺ
. Please ignore this nonsense formula
W
W
WW
WW
I just love upside-down H's, don't you?
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
![]() | Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
![]() | Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
|
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
WW
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
wdwd | |||
wdwa | |||
General Punger talk 23:53, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
//Lol/Wisimifsimso
~~~~ SIGNATURE DOES NOT WORK IN VISUAL EDITOR
General Punger talk 23:04, 21 January 2021 (UTC) General Punger talk 23:04, 21 January 2021 (UTC) 23:04, 21 January 2021 (UTC) General Punger talk
aA 'A' |A| "GeneralPunger" ( GeneralPunger ( talk) 12:14, 5 August 2015 (UTC))
egesrhdrtfhxedht
ee
BOLD BOLDITALIC ITALIC UNDERLINEITALIC eFERereadawsdawd
ded Last revision of hounding:
Eti15TrSf ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Back in September, an image was replaced on New York City Subway. Eti15TrSf decided to step in and revert it three months later with accusations of self-promotion, along with " you are not entitled to have your pictures used everywhere". The image replacement in question is subjectively better at first glance. The issue being had here is that instead of going to the talk page to discuss said image, Eti15TrSf persisted in their accusations of bad faith. @ GeneralPunger:, can you add your context to this? Cards 84664 03:30, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
We need more evidence for a pattern but Eti15TrSf very clearly targeted GeneralPunger's image here based on an unsupported claim of "self-promotion" (how, exactly?). I don't know that you can call it a content dispute; GeneralPunger's image is clearly better than the one it replaced (in terms of exposure and color). It's not remotely a close call, and no else agreed with the edit. Eti15TrSf themselves knew it was a good image because they added it to R46 (New York City Subway car) in July. Fundamentally this is a user conduct issue because Eti15TrSf is targeting GeneralPunger, and he should probably stop doing that. Mackensen (talk) 12:44, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
TEST
R32 (New York City SwdawdawdawdawdawdUUUUU
[[File:NYCS-bull-trans-{{{service}}}.svg|65px|"{{{service}}}" train symbol]] R68 N train at 39th Avenue | |
![]() | |
[[file:NYCS map {{{service}}}.svg|250px|Map of the "{{{service}}}" train]] |
This is a Test
e | Test | C | L |
---|---|---|---|
Frey | W | Nv | X |
Zach | F | Or | V |
Card | C | DB | V |
ṣṢṡṩỰṺ
. Please ignore this nonsense formula
W
W
WW
WW
I just love upside-down H's, don't you?
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
![]() | Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
![]() | Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
|
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
WW
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W