- Science and Nature Journal looks like a solid and relevant source with a good reputation. I think we can rely on it more than the others for this article. Nice research! Gender Roamer ( talk) 22:44, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Science and Nature Journal [1] is a reliable source. Gender Roamer ( talk) 22:45, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- A blog is a poor source. Gender Roamer ( talk) 22:46, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- WP:NEWSBLOG is the only acceptable blog. Gender Roamer ( talk) 22:47, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- The only acceptable blogs are those that adhere to WP:NEWSBLOG. Gender Roamer ( talk) 22:49, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Forums are not reliable references. WP:NOTRELIABLE. Gender Roamer ( talk) 23:18, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
WP:Citing sources. I don't like some of the examples on that page. I prefer some styles I see in Wikipedia articles. Gender Roamer ( talk) 23:35, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
[2] I knew that the partial ref piece points to the same source. This is called
WP:REFNAME.
References
- ^ Gnawledge, O'penn. "Planet Earth in the Balance of History". Science and Nature Journal. SandNjournal.com/Earthinthebalance. March 21, 2013. Retrieved 23:00, Monday, March 15, 2021 (UTC).
- ^ "Standards of Care for the Health of Transsexual, Transgender, and Gender Nonconforming People" (PDF). World Professional Association for Transgender Health. pp. 14–17. Retrieved 15 March 2021.
Every user is expected to interact with others civilly, calmly, and in a spirit of cooperation. Do not insult, harass, or intimidate those with whom you have a disagreement. Rather, approach the matter intelligently and engage in polite discussion. If another user behaves in an uncivil, uncooperative, or insulting manner, or even tries to harass or intimidate you, this does not give you an excuse to respond in kind. Address only the factual points brought forward, ignoring the inappropriate comments, or disregard that user entirely. If necessary, point out gently that you think the comments might be considered uncivil, and make it clear that you want to move on and focus on the content issue. If a conflict continues to bother you, take advantage of Wikipedia's dispute resolution process. There are always users willing to mediate and arbitrate disputes between others.
- Science and Nature Journal looks like a solid and relevant source with a good reputation. I think we can rely on it more than the others for this article. Nice research! Gender Roamer ( talk) 22:44, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Science and Nature Journal [1] is a reliable source. Gender Roamer ( talk) 22:45, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- A blog is a poor source. Gender Roamer ( talk) 22:46, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- WP:NEWSBLOG is the only acceptable blog. Gender Roamer ( talk) 22:47, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- The only acceptable blogs are those that adhere to WP:NEWSBLOG. Gender Roamer ( talk) 22:49, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Forums are not reliable references. WP:NOTRELIABLE. Gender Roamer ( talk) 23:18, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
WP:Citing sources. I don't like some of the examples on that page. I prefer some styles I see in Wikipedia articles. Gender Roamer ( talk) 23:35, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
[2] I knew that the partial ref piece points to the same source. This is called
WP:REFNAME.
References
- ^ Gnawledge, O'penn. "Planet Earth in the Balance of History". Science and Nature Journal. SandNjournal.com/Earthinthebalance. March 21, 2013. Retrieved 23:00, Monday, March 15, 2021 (UTC).
- ^ "Standards of Care for the Health of Transsexual, Transgender, and Gender Nonconforming People" (PDF). World Professional Association for Transgender Health. pp. 14–17. Retrieved 15 March 2021.
Every user is expected to interact with others civilly, calmly, and in a spirit of cooperation. Do not insult, harass, or intimidate those with whom you have a disagreement. Rather, approach the matter intelligently and engage in polite discussion. If another user behaves in an uncivil, uncooperative, or insulting manner, or even tries to harass or intimidate you, this does not give you an excuse to respond in kind. Address only the factual points brought forward, ignoring the inappropriate comments, or disregard that user entirely. If necessary, point out gently that you think the comments might be considered uncivil, and make it clear that you want to move on and focus on the content issue. If a conflict continues to bother you, take advantage of Wikipedia's dispute resolution process. There are always users willing to mediate and arbitrate disputes between others.