Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Article title - New article on Data Sanitization Policy for Government

Article Evaluation - No current definitive article exists for this topic and could stand on it's own while linking to other related Wiki pages

Sources: Possible Mix of NISP/NIST/Government standards, Executive orders, Industry publications/standards, and other reliable sources on driving policy for sanitization of Data in Government.

Article title - NISP Data Sanitization

National Industrial Security Program#Data sanitization

Article Evaluation

• Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes
• Is it written neutrally? Yes
• Does each claim have a citation? Yes
• Are the citations reliable? Yes
• Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)? N/A
• Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too

Sources - Mainly Government, could use additional civil sources

Article title - Data sanitization

Data sanitization

Article Evaluation

• Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes
• Is it written neutrally? Fairly even, however the topic does wander a it off topic
• Does each claim have a citation?
• Are the citations reliable? Yes
• Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)? N/A
• Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.

Sources

Mostly Academic journals, could have used more government standards and sources involving repercussions of failed data sanitization

Article title Sanitization of Classified Information

Sanitization (classified information)

Article Evaluation

• Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes, but has a slanted focus on hard copy and not electronic data
• Is it written neutrally? Yes
• Does each claim have a citation? No
• Are the citations reliable? Yes, but limited in scope in terms of
• Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)? N/A
• Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.

Sources

Mostly popular press sources, could use updating with content related to government standards and policies.

Article title

Article Evaluation

Sources