![]() | The following is a proposed Wikipedia policy, guideline, or process. The proposal may still be in development, under discussion, or in the process of gathering consensus for adoption. |
This proposal agrees and don't aim to conflict with
Currently big articles are getting optimized further from multiple Wiki Projects since all use the same guidelines.
Example: The article Linux is an article interest from 7 different Wiki Projects (including us).
Currently these articles are part of our Top importance list:
I don't think that we are able to contribute a significant effect if we consider those articles as Top priority and work on those further.
Prioritization based on need, support of FOSS and demand by the community. Bottom-up approach instead of pushing the dinosaurs further.
We should ask ourselves:
Importance | Criteria | Examples |
---|---|---|
Top | - Handpicked topics by FOSS Task Force | |
High | - New FOSS projects in recent use but struggle with secondary sources but have a chance to fulfill
Wikipedia:Notability
- Lists and comparisons of FOSS |
- Nitter, Freetube, Pixelfed, Invidious
- List of password managers, List of free and open-source software packages |
Mid | - FOSS in widespread use but superseeded by newer FOSS projects
- Topics which are suited to promote FOSS ideas |
-
Zabbix,
OpenOffice.org
- Richard Stallman, Chromium (web browser), Android Open Source Project |
Low | - Well established articles, usually already high or mid quality
- FOSS of mostly historical relevance (includes unmaintained software) or changed to closed source |
- Ubuntu, Copyleft, Plan 9 from Bell Labs |
![]() | The following is a proposed Wikipedia policy, guideline, or process. The proposal may still be in development, under discussion, or in the process of gathering consensus for adoption. |
This proposal agrees and don't aim to conflict with
Currently big articles are getting optimized further from multiple Wiki Projects since all use the same guidelines.
Example: The article Linux is an article interest from 7 different Wiki Projects (including us).
Currently these articles are part of our Top importance list:
I don't think that we are able to contribute a significant effect if we consider those articles as Top priority and work on those further.
Prioritization based on need, support of FOSS and demand by the community. Bottom-up approach instead of pushing the dinosaurs further.
We should ask ourselves:
Importance | Criteria | Examples |
---|---|---|
Top | - Handpicked topics by FOSS Task Force | |
High | - New FOSS projects in recent use but struggle with secondary sources but have a chance to fulfill
Wikipedia:Notability
- Lists and comparisons of FOSS |
- Nitter, Freetube, Pixelfed, Invidious
- List of password managers, List of free and open-source software packages |
Mid | - FOSS in widespread use but superseeded by newer FOSS projects
- Topics which are suited to promote FOSS ideas |
-
Zabbix,
OpenOffice.org
- Richard Stallman, Chromium (web browser), Android Open Source Project |
Low | - Well established articles, usually already high or mid quality
- FOSS of mostly historical relevance (includes unmaintained software) or changed to closed source |
- Ubuntu, Copyleft, Plan 9 from Bell Labs |