Reason: Promotional article by
WP:SPA that has no credible claim of notability (and was previously A7 speedy deleted). Does not meet the
WP:GNG or
WP:BIO.
Reason: Non-notable
WP:AUTOBIO created by
WP:SPA. No assertion of notability, no reliable sources provided. Does not meet the
WP:GNG or
WP:NMOTORSPORT.
Reason: The article makes no assertion of notability, and no reliable sources have been provided. I was unable to find any other reliable sources that could be added. It appears the subject does not meet the
WP:GNG.
Reason: The article makes no assertion of notability, and appears to be entirely
WP:OR. I am unable to find any further reliable sources that could be added to the page. It appears the subject does not meet the
WP:GNG or
WP:BAND.
Reason: No reliable assertion of notability, all references on page are primary sources from actual website. It appears the subject does not meet the
WP:GNG.
Reason: Appears to be a
WP:NEO. No assertion of notability, and no sources have been provided. Unable to find anything further online. Does not meet
WP:GNG.
Reason: No assertion of notability, no reliable sources provided. Unable to find any further reliable sources that could be added to the page. Does not meet the
WP:GNG.
Reason: No assertion of notability, no independent sources at all provided. I couldn't turn up any reliable source coverage at all. Does not meet
WP:GNG,
WP:CORP, and doesn't qualify under
WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES as it's not independently accredited and does not appear to confer degrees.
Reason: No assertion of notability in article, and no sources at all. My own search turned up mention on a single blog, but no substantial coverage in reliable sources. Does not meet
WP:GNG.
Reason: No real assertion of notability, aside being second tallest building in small city. Single citation on page is to a blog type website. Coverage online is just trivial routine coverage by local media. Does not meet
WP:GNG.
Reason: No assertion of notability, aside being second tallest building in small city. Single citation on page is to a blog type website. Coverage online is just trivial routine coverage by local media. Does not meet
WP:GNG.
Reason: No assertion of notability, aside being third tallest building in small city. Single citation on page is to a blog type website. Does not meet WP:GNG.
Reason: Unsourced, promotional, non-encyclopedic article. Would tag for speedy but it has the unsupported assertion that it's rare and historic. Can't find reliable sources; doesn't meet
WP:GNG or
WP:CORP.
Reason: No assertion of notability, no independent sources at all provided. I couldn't turn up any reliable source coverage. Does not meet
WP:GNG,
WP:CORP, and doesn't qualify under
WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES as it's not independently accredited and does not appear to confer degrees.
Reason: Promo article that makes no reliable assertion of notability, and all sources provided are from foundation's own website. Not able to find reliable third party sources. Does not meet
WP:GNG or
WP:CORP.
Reason: No assertion of notability, and none of the given citations have any independent coverage of D'Arrigo. My own searches turned up no substantial coverage. Does not meet
WP:GNG or
Wp:BIO.
Reason: No assertion of notability in article, and only sources given are not reliable. Unable to turn up any further sources. Does not appear to meet
WP:GNG or
WP:BIO.
Reason: No assertion of notability, and two sources provided on page are not independent. Unable to find further sources. Appears subject does not meet the
WP:GNG or
WP:BIO.
Reason: No assertion of notability, and no reliable sources provided. Unable to find any further reliable sources that could be added. Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:BIO.
Reason: No assertion of notability, no independent sources provided. I couldn't turn up any reliable source coverage at all. Does not meet WP:GNG, WP:CORP, and doesn't qualify under WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES as it's not independently accredited and does not appear to confer degrees.
Reason: The article's only source is a website for the book. I am unable to find any further reliable sources that could be added to the page. It appears the subject does not meet the
WP:GNG.
Reason: Promotional article by
WP:SPA that has no credible claim of notability (and was previously A7 speedy deleted). Does not meet the
WP:GNG or
WP:BIO.
Reason: Non-notable
WP:AUTOBIO created by
WP:SPA. No assertion of notability, no reliable sources provided. Does not meet the
WP:GNG or
WP:NMOTORSPORT.
Reason: The article makes no assertion of notability, and no reliable sources have been provided. I was unable to find any other reliable sources that could be added. It appears the subject does not meet the
WP:GNG.
Reason: The article makes no assertion of notability, and appears to be entirely
WP:OR. I am unable to find any further reliable sources that could be added to the page. It appears the subject does not meet the
WP:GNG or
WP:BAND.
Reason: No reliable assertion of notability, all references on page are primary sources from actual website. It appears the subject does not meet the
WP:GNG.
Reason: Appears to be a
WP:NEO. No assertion of notability, and no sources have been provided. Unable to find anything further online. Does not meet
WP:GNG.
Reason: No assertion of notability, no reliable sources provided. Unable to find any further reliable sources that could be added to the page. Does not meet the
WP:GNG.
Reason: No assertion of notability, no independent sources at all provided. I couldn't turn up any reliable source coverage at all. Does not meet
WP:GNG,
WP:CORP, and doesn't qualify under
WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES as it's not independently accredited and does not appear to confer degrees.
Reason: No assertion of notability in article, and no sources at all. My own search turned up mention on a single blog, but no substantial coverage in reliable sources. Does not meet
WP:GNG.
Reason: No real assertion of notability, aside being second tallest building in small city. Single citation on page is to a blog type website. Coverage online is just trivial routine coverage by local media. Does not meet
WP:GNG.
Reason: No assertion of notability, aside being second tallest building in small city. Single citation on page is to a blog type website. Coverage online is just trivial routine coverage by local media. Does not meet
WP:GNG.
Reason: No assertion of notability, aside being third tallest building in small city. Single citation on page is to a blog type website. Does not meet WP:GNG.
Reason: Unsourced, promotional, non-encyclopedic article. Would tag for speedy but it has the unsupported assertion that it's rare and historic. Can't find reliable sources; doesn't meet
WP:GNG or
WP:CORP.
Reason: No assertion of notability, no independent sources at all provided. I couldn't turn up any reliable source coverage. Does not meet
WP:GNG,
WP:CORP, and doesn't qualify under
WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES as it's not independently accredited and does not appear to confer degrees.
Reason: Promo article that makes no reliable assertion of notability, and all sources provided are from foundation's own website. Not able to find reliable third party sources. Does not meet
WP:GNG or
WP:CORP.
Reason: No assertion of notability, and none of the given citations have any independent coverage of D'Arrigo. My own searches turned up no substantial coverage. Does not meet
WP:GNG or
Wp:BIO.
Reason: No assertion of notability in article, and only sources given are not reliable. Unable to turn up any further sources. Does not appear to meet
WP:GNG or
WP:BIO.
Reason: No assertion of notability, and two sources provided on page are not independent. Unable to find further sources. Appears subject does not meet the
WP:GNG or
WP:BIO.
Reason: No assertion of notability, and no reliable sources provided. Unable to find any further reliable sources that could be added. Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:BIO.
Reason: No assertion of notability, no independent sources provided. I couldn't turn up any reliable source coverage at all. Does not meet WP:GNG, WP:CORP, and doesn't qualify under WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES as it's not independently accredited and does not appear to confer degrees.
Reason: The article's only source is a website for the book. I am unable to find any further reliable sources that could be added to the page. It appears the subject does not meet the
WP:GNG.