![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
Hello!
I like that you've utilized more sources and added multiple perspectives with the information you've added; I think it helps ensure the article is balanced and not only from one or a few sources. Your writing is concise, clear and I think it blends in well with the existing article. Your additions to the History and Archaeology section have definitely made the article feel more complete by filling in some gaps. At the top you mentioned that you are potentially adding a new section, I am just curious what you're planning to add as I don't see many current suggestions on the Talk page except for potentially adding 'Cherchen Men and Family'. I think focusing on improving the current sections is already a great objective, especially since Wikipedia displays a message at the top saying the article lacks inline citations. If you have a chance, consider reviewing the sources and statements beyond your additions and add inline citations. Overall, I think the additions you've made to the article are well done! Some of the sources you've found may also help me with my article, so thank you for that! I look forward to seeing your final edits.
![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
Hello!
I like that you've utilized more sources and added multiple perspectives with the information you've added; I think it helps ensure the article is balanced and not only from one or a few sources. Your writing is concise, clear and I think it blends in well with the existing article. Your additions to the History and Archaeology section have definitely made the article feel more complete by filling in some gaps. At the top you mentioned that you are potentially adding a new section, I am just curious what you're planning to add as I don't see many current suggestions on the Talk page except for potentially adding 'Cherchen Men and Family'. I think focusing on improving the current sections is already a great objective, especially since Wikipedia displays a message at the top saying the article lacks inline citations. If you have a chance, consider reviewing the sources and statements beyond your additions and add inline citations. Overall, I think the additions you've made to the article are well done! Some of the sources you've found may also help me with my article, so thank you for that! I look forward to seeing your final edits.