FisherQueen
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
It has begun[1] I'm getting a sock report. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/ complex 11:47, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Watching a contrib pageIn the discussion at a certain editor's talk page, you said something about having their contributions on watch lists. Is there a way for a regular editor to add a contributions page to a watch list? -- A More Perfect Onion ( talk) 14:21, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Gender-specific wordsHi, I saw your reversion of my edit of Ann Bannon, where you said you preferred the "gender-neutral" word "hero" instead of "heroine". I must admit I've heard this a few times recently and assumed that the speakers were being sloppy. The word "heroine" is gender-specific, but so is "hero". Ms Bannon is specifically feminine, so if a feminine word exists why not use it? I ask out of genuine interest. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Patrick Neylan ( talk • contribs) 22:15, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
pingAvon calling. Tvoz/ talk 05:56, 4 May 2009 (UTC) Philip MarkoffFisherQueen-You left a message threatening to have me banned for making a threat of legal action. That was bad faith on your part, since I never made any such threat to sue anyone. I merely raised the issue that biographies of living persons should not contain defamatory information since the person who is the subject of the article could bring a legal action. That is very different from making a threat to sue someone. Please do not make unwarranted threats to ban someone. Thank you. Theo789 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theo789 ( talk • contribs) 16:48, 4 May 2009 (UTC) FisherQueen, I see that now you are threatening to ban me for making edits to an article about a living person to present a more neutral view and diminish any libelous aspects. Please stop with these threats. It is really upsetting and obnoxious for you to be making such threats. Theo789 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theo789 ( talk • contribs) 17:15, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Where can I open a discussion about your threats and harassment, is there is place for that? Theo789 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theo789 ( talk • contribs) 18:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
HellinaBucket(throwing up hands in frustration) Well, you can't say that we didn't try... I've had enough and will just have to wait and see what happens when the block runs out in a few hours. — Travis talk 12:42, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Really??? Very perplexing behavior indeed. We shall see... though sadly I have a small amount of faith in my "prediction". - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 13:45, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
No not stalking you, just pointing out that you do not always research as edxhibited above. HellinaBucket ( talk) 13:49, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
I mean me, if you are unable to tell the differences between a man or woman how can your research be trusted? HellinaBucket ( talk) 13:53, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
I see correct information is not valued here. Yes the user has appeared to violate the policies here but that is no reason for you or Travis to get Rude with them. In this case more so Travis then you although both instances are inappropriate because it amounts to taunting that person. The above posting saying it is good intentioned is correct. Maybe my comment can help ease that persons anger over mistreatment (real or percieved). HellinaBucket ( talk) 14:03, 6 May 2009 (UTC) I added a partial copy of this cmment to Gaffers page to clarify I was not supporting the policies being broken. HellinaBucket ( talk) 14:10, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Again thats why i went to the page to clarify i do not support vandalism, I'm etremely sorry it looks that way but you guys weren't being very civil. HellinaBucket ( talk) 14:42, 6 May 2009 (UTC) Someetimes people don't have the barrier between mouth and brain and just calling someone a vandal is what i am talking about. Always assume good faith, even if it's not that just provokes a situation and makes it worse. trying to help that person not feel as attacked. HellinaBucket ( talk) 14:44, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
I am merely disagreeing with you. You are a teacher so you should know about conflict resolution, I never said anything about you or your post. I'm merely pointing out we should still Assume Good Faith and treat user with kindness. Statements that a person is just a vandal is rude and provocative. The person may have broken policies on wikipedia but that does NOT sum that persons entire character. Does removing trivia count as removing vandalism? HellinaBucket ( talk) 14:57, 6 May 2009 (UTC) I myself believe that admin are to be bheld to a higher standard then all other Wikipedia users. One of the five pillars in wikipedia is to Assume Good Faith. Even if a user has been blocked that assumption should continue not berating his requests for unblock. The assumption should be that when and if the block is lifted the behaviours will be remedied. Remember that user is probably very upset and wanting to lash out. Why give them further excuse? My block was different then that users but I feel in mine that the research wasn't properly coordinated or handled. I definitly tried Good faith assumptions with that user, reached out several times and the attacks continued. I tried getting third partied invovled until I lost my cool. The block while in my mind unnec. served it's purpose and had it's desired effect. I did see a complete lack of admin ermpathy though and maybe if you were to employ that more with your admonshments it would be better recvd. Sometimes you don't look at things as taunting but something as simple as a refusal to acknowledge someones gender even if after pointed out is areas for improvement. help me understand your point, i'll discuss rationally without rancor HellinaBucket ( talk) 15:56, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi Fisher, my block is over. I wanted to come by and apoligize. Yes apoligize. My behaviour the last week was disruptive and immature. I had to really think about what I was doing and the purpose of Wikipedia to really grasp what I needed to grasp. The fact is that this is a site that allows people to add to the collective pool of logic and knowledge. It is non-discriminatory to your education level so long as a you contribute usefully and I had to remind myself that this IS A PRIVILEGE and is something to value and hold in esteem. While sometimes seeming arbitrary and quick the block does serve a purpose in stopping people from doing what I was doing and does help maintain good standards for everyone else. I will attempt to work on taking correction better because it is definitly a flaw of mine that I struggle to control. I once again would like to apoligize for being a pain in your butt. HellinaBucket ( talk) 19:35, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
I have a question for you. If I wanted to add the templates on my user page how would i do that? where would I do that? Specifically I'm trying to add "this user is a " HellinaBucket ( talk) 13:40, 9 May 2009 (UTC) Absolutely sorry to bug, Vegkilla is following me around and reverting edits I've made on articles. Specifically The article on Professional Bull Riders. I removed the info because it was trivia and not well wrote, however due to the level of scrutiny I am under I am very hesitant to do ANYTHING about it but would like to get someone elses opinion on the matter. Can you look into it at all? I would appreciate any assisance on this matter. Sorrr if you think the best thing to do is drop it let me know I DEF. do not want to be blocked again! —Preceding unsigned comment added by HellinaBucket ( talk • contribs) 10:00, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks Fisher, your help is appreciated. I created my first article today with the help of some others, check it out. Central High School(Pueblo, Colorado) HellinaBucket ( talk) 03:00, 11 May 2009 (UTC) Nicei lol'd -- Closedmouth ( talk) 12:50, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Franco BerardiAcording to the page on Franco Berardi, apparently there was a page about him, but its been deleted. Is there any reason for this on the log other than Notability, which is pretty eroneous (The guy is a touring philosopher who started the telestreet movement in italy and has been published in places like Semiotexte and others). Is there a record of the original page anywhere I can at least get info from? I'm not sure what went down that lead to the deletion (maybe it was a garbage article), but due to my inability to read the non english versions of the page, even the beginings of an english version would be neat. Cheers. Duck Monster ( talk) 14:47, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
About my User PageThanks for responding to my talk page first however if I may ask why is keeping a personal log considered a Personal attack?-- Sadbuttrue92 ( talk) 11:20, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
The Helping Hand Barnstar
articale QamilshliAssyrian (Assyria) just relegins (Christian) it’s not nation We know as a Muslim Arab people there are no nation called Assyrian it’s false name, we know there are few hundred Christians living in Qamishli ,and they came from Greece and Turkey as asylums and Syrian government give hem full right in Syria ,and most of them they went to Europe and America, Canada .we never hearted about Assyrian in Qamishli ,maybe a few people left in Qamishli not more than 200 people. Article QamishliAssyrian (Assyria) just relegins (Christian) it’s not nation We know as a Muslim Arab people there are no nation called Assyrian it’s false name, we know there are few hundred Christians living in Qamishli ,and they came from Greece and Turkey as asylums and Syrian government give hem full right in Syria ,and most of them they went to Europe and America, Canada .we never hearted about Assyrian in Qamishli ,maybe a few people left in Qamishli not more than 200 people. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.109.84.9 ( talk) 12:45, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Personal attacksHello. In the ANI page, you wrote the following about my dispute with Opinoso: When I reviewed the talk page, it looked like there were lots of personal attacks being thrown around on both sides. Don't worry; in a hundred years we'll all be dead, and other editors who can talk nicely to each other will sort out the right statistics. I reviewed it too. As far as I can see, there are no personal attacks by me there. Can you please point to me where have I made them, so that I can more easily avoid making them in the future? Thank you. Ninguém ( talk) 15:24, 8 May 2009 (UTC) And, please, if you can't find any personal attacks by me, can you state that at the same thread were you said I have made them? Thank you very much. Ninguém ( talk) 01:19, 9 May 2009 (UTC) Two little tales for your enjoyment:
: 11 May 2009
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 21:47, 11 May 2009 (UTC) 194x144x90x118Take a look at what 194x144x90x118 ( talk · contribs) has added to his talk page, what do you think the means by the IHO? Dougweller ( talk) 05:33, 12 May 2009 (UTC) It means in honor of, I laughed my ass of silly reading that stuff, it's simply beautiful.-- 194x144x90x118 ( talk) 16:26, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
QuestionAre you really both a lesbian and a Christian? How do you cope with the all the narrow minded pinheads?
Help if you had a chance, pleaseI've mostly finished my first contribution, Corset Controversy. Did I get it right? The style and form, I mean. Do you suppose you could take a look at it and tell me, please? Its in my sandbox. HeatherSmithfield ( talk) 23:48, 14 May 2009 (UTC)User:HeatherSmithfield
Its there. Thank you so much for your help. HeatherSmithfield User:123PatrickMC
: 18 May 2009
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 12:51, 19 May 2009 (UTC) Terence DaviesHello! It was me, unlogged-in, who restored the information about Terence Davies never having acted professionally. It's mentioned here: [2]. -- Chips Critic ( talk) 00:10, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
What the hell???I put the effort into writing a brand new article for wikipedia and you just go ahead and delete without consulting me and then INSULT me with a computer generate template rather than a human response? Don't even bother in the future, I hope to never run into you again. I expect an apology. Poetwhofailstoknowit ( talk) 16:07, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Don't be terse with me boy. You arrogantly I never read it. I have read all of wikipedia's rules and policies, I am very acquainted with them. Please restore my article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Poetwhofailstoknowit ( talk • contribs) 16:20, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Please CEASE AND DESIST your course of PASSIVE AGGRESSION AND ARROGANT ASSUMPTIONS. My article stands, you MUST RESTORE IT. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Poetwhofailstoknowit ( talk • contribs) 16:33, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
This is your last chance; restore the goddamn article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Poetwhofailstoknowit ( talk • contribs) 16:48, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Me apologise to her after she treated me with such contempt? I have a right mind to report her for admin abuse, never mind 'apologise'. Poetwhofailstoknowit ( talk) 17:10, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
I was speaking rhetorically. I'm not actually going to report you, because I recognise you were merely being passive aggressive, and we all know passive aggression is never punished in court, it is an insidious and sinister debating tactic by people who know the system well; hence they exploit all parts of the system they can and still to manage to get away with it. Thats why I won't report you, because you'll walk scotch free. After all, what use is it to have the admins investigating the admins? I hope to put this over us, but please do not be rude, passive aggressive or contemptuous of me ever again. Poetwhofailstoknowit ( talk) 17:16, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
*sigh* - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:36, 21 May 2009 (UTC) Hate to say it but a talk page block is in order. Enforce a total cool-down, that's what it took with me and this is oddly reminscent of my tirade about you (minus the sex preference part, your buisiness not mine) Hell in a Bucket ( talk) 17:39, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
COI in Mark Bell (journalist)I contend that a COI does not exist in this article. This is according to Wiki COI policy: "Do not edit Wikipedia to promote your own interests, or those of other individuals or of organizations, including employers, unless you are certain that the interests of Wikipedia remain paramount." I am asking you, in turn, to identify in this article where I am not neutral or where a conflict exists. This article only briefly mentions that Bell is an MTSU graduate and does not promote the school whatsoever. Therefore, the fact that I go to a school where he graduate (one year before I even started I might add) makes no difference and doesn't affect my ability to be objective. This is also not an "advertisement masquerading as an article," and does not fall under WP:SPAM. Multiple sources are cited in a variety of places that can be used to VERIFY all of the FACTS contained within the article. For these reasons, I ask that you please expedite this issue. WHoWhoOwl ( talk) 16:41, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
FisherQueen: Thank you for not nominating it for deletion. I do not know him personally. Only what I've heard from professors and been able to read about him in the paper and research articles he's left behind at MTSU. I do follow The Daily News Journal as it is the paper here in our city. He is a local celebrity and I've heard him speak at MTSU about how he fought his journalism battles while watching and helping his grandfather -- who had cancer which eventually killed him -- fight for his life. I do understand that because of this I have the POTENTIAL to be biased, but as I've stated before and as you've agreed -- the article has a neutral tone. I will most likely abstain from writing any further on the subject if you feel that is appropriate. WHoWhoOwl ( talk) 16:53, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Thank you. You do the same. WHoWhoOwl ( talk) 17:02, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
I believe that. I really do. I can only imagine the number of self-promoting band pages that have been deleted! ;) Good luck with this fellow up above. He/She is being very rude. WHoWhoOwl ( talk) 17:09, 21 May 2009 (UTC) (Jewels) User talk:86.40.209.112I take the point, but he's had warnings, he's had advice, he's dissembled about his his vandalism. Even unintentional, I regarded this as disruptive and unlikely to assist with his next unblock. What would you have done? Rodhull andemu 20:40, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Neslgrad09Hi FisherQueen, Would appreciate your candid thoughts on my actions regarding User:Neslgrad09. Based on Fred's comments at my talk page, I reversed my actions, but would appreciate your review not as it regards your upholding my block, but if the block and the page protection was heavy handed on my part. Greatly appreciate any constructive criticism. Thanks! Hiberniantears ( talk) 03:33, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Can I havethe last 4 hours of my life back? Law type! snype? 14:19, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
You really outta learn how to dodge the paper trail. You should have used IRC for one thing, and sky writing for the other! Law type! snype? 23:22, 25 May 2009 (UTC) User:ДжокерWere you getting Joker emails from this one? I was about to block them indefinitely for being a creeper but it seems you got to them first. I don't even edit that often so I have no idea why they would email me. Darth Griz98 19:44, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
TheTwittererGood point. I just don't want them getting away with it. -- Tm1000 ( talk) 21:08, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
In case you haven't noticed,Or you don't have his page on your watchlist Andrewwisne ( talk · contribs), has made rebuttals to your responses.— Dæ dαlus Contribs 22:14, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Thank youFor blocking that user. I think I need a breather.— Dæ dαlus Contribs 23:47, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
: 25 May 2009
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 03:32, 26 May 2009 (UTC) QuestionI was creating a new article on an american aUTHOR/mERCENARY, i'VE FOUND FIVE SOURCES BUT THE ARTICLE IS STILL SHORT. dO YOU THINK YOU CAN LOOK AT IT AND TELL ME iF i ESTABLISHED ENOUGH NOTABILITY TO KEEP IT HERE. ty, IT'S THE ARTICLE ON Frank Camper. Thats really the only thing I need to know, just don't want it to be deleted. Hell in a Bucket ( talk) 11:20, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Another QuestionI have a complete listing of Franks books and Have one reference page for all of them. Should I attempt to find different sites for all his books or do I cite the entire section as one? Hell in a Bucket ( talk) 13:56, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Wisne (2nd nomination)I have rewritten Andy Wisne in a neutral, encyclopedic fashion. You wrote that "If I'm wrong and he really is notable, then presumably someone other than himself will inevitably be inspired to write about him." Your comment inspired me to rewrite the article. I hope you can take a look at it and reevaluate your position at the AfD. Cunard ( talk) 08:16, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Edward Low vandalI was looking into the latest incarnation, User:Aranesp, while you were blocking him. The user talk page is...interesting, with comments dating back to 2007 and barnstars dating back to 2005, for a user registered last month. It seems the user created his talk page by copy/pasting an old version of User talk:Staecker. It was supplemented with some barnstars from User:Jehochman's subpage, with the username changed. Seemed like an awful lot of effort to create a respectable persona. Sure enough, one wasn't enough for him: check out User talk:Weiserthanu, please. Maralia ( talk) 17:15, 27 May 2009 (UTC) Likewise User:Lawtonlawdawg; see [3]. Maralia ( talk) 04:32, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Kitten
PirateSmackK
Arrrr! has given you a
kitten! Kittens promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Kittens must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{ subst:Kitten}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message! I've seen that you deny a lot of unblock request; that's the only thing I don't like about you. PirateSmackK Arrrr! 18:33, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |
FisherQueen
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
It has begun[1] I'm getting a sock report. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/ complex 11:47, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Watching a contrib pageIn the discussion at a certain editor's talk page, you said something about having their contributions on watch lists. Is there a way for a regular editor to add a contributions page to a watch list? -- A More Perfect Onion ( talk) 14:21, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Gender-specific wordsHi, I saw your reversion of my edit of Ann Bannon, where you said you preferred the "gender-neutral" word "hero" instead of "heroine". I must admit I've heard this a few times recently and assumed that the speakers were being sloppy. The word "heroine" is gender-specific, but so is "hero". Ms Bannon is specifically feminine, so if a feminine word exists why not use it? I ask out of genuine interest. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Patrick Neylan ( talk • contribs) 22:15, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
pingAvon calling. Tvoz/ talk 05:56, 4 May 2009 (UTC) Philip MarkoffFisherQueen-You left a message threatening to have me banned for making a threat of legal action. That was bad faith on your part, since I never made any such threat to sue anyone. I merely raised the issue that biographies of living persons should not contain defamatory information since the person who is the subject of the article could bring a legal action. That is very different from making a threat to sue someone. Please do not make unwarranted threats to ban someone. Thank you. Theo789 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theo789 ( talk • contribs) 16:48, 4 May 2009 (UTC) FisherQueen, I see that now you are threatening to ban me for making edits to an article about a living person to present a more neutral view and diminish any libelous aspects. Please stop with these threats. It is really upsetting and obnoxious for you to be making such threats. Theo789 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theo789 ( talk • contribs) 17:15, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Where can I open a discussion about your threats and harassment, is there is place for that? Theo789 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theo789 ( talk • contribs) 18:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
HellinaBucket(throwing up hands in frustration) Well, you can't say that we didn't try... I've had enough and will just have to wait and see what happens when the block runs out in a few hours. — Travis talk 12:42, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Really??? Very perplexing behavior indeed. We shall see... though sadly I have a small amount of faith in my "prediction". - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 13:45, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
No not stalking you, just pointing out that you do not always research as edxhibited above. HellinaBucket ( talk) 13:49, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
I mean me, if you are unable to tell the differences between a man or woman how can your research be trusted? HellinaBucket ( talk) 13:53, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
I see correct information is not valued here. Yes the user has appeared to violate the policies here but that is no reason for you or Travis to get Rude with them. In this case more so Travis then you although both instances are inappropriate because it amounts to taunting that person. The above posting saying it is good intentioned is correct. Maybe my comment can help ease that persons anger over mistreatment (real or percieved). HellinaBucket ( talk) 14:03, 6 May 2009 (UTC) I added a partial copy of this cmment to Gaffers page to clarify I was not supporting the policies being broken. HellinaBucket ( talk) 14:10, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Again thats why i went to the page to clarify i do not support vandalism, I'm etremely sorry it looks that way but you guys weren't being very civil. HellinaBucket ( talk) 14:42, 6 May 2009 (UTC) Someetimes people don't have the barrier between mouth and brain and just calling someone a vandal is what i am talking about. Always assume good faith, even if it's not that just provokes a situation and makes it worse. trying to help that person not feel as attacked. HellinaBucket ( talk) 14:44, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
I am merely disagreeing with you. You are a teacher so you should know about conflict resolution, I never said anything about you or your post. I'm merely pointing out we should still Assume Good Faith and treat user with kindness. Statements that a person is just a vandal is rude and provocative. The person may have broken policies on wikipedia but that does NOT sum that persons entire character. Does removing trivia count as removing vandalism? HellinaBucket ( talk) 14:57, 6 May 2009 (UTC) I myself believe that admin are to be bheld to a higher standard then all other Wikipedia users. One of the five pillars in wikipedia is to Assume Good Faith. Even if a user has been blocked that assumption should continue not berating his requests for unblock. The assumption should be that when and if the block is lifted the behaviours will be remedied. Remember that user is probably very upset and wanting to lash out. Why give them further excuse? My block was different then that users but I feel in mine that the research wasn't properly coordinated or handled. I definitly tried Good faith assumptions with that user, reached out several times and the attacks continued. I tried getting third partied invovled until I lost my cool. The block while in my mind unnec. served it's purpose and had it's desired effect. I did see a complete lack of admin ermpathy though and maybe if you were to employ that more with your admonshments it would be better recvd. Sometimes you don't look at things as taunting but something as simple as a refusal to acknowledge someones gender even if after pointed out is areas for improvement. help me understand your point, i'll discuss rationally without rancor HellinaBucket ( talk) 15:56, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi Fisher, my block is over. I wanted to come by and apoligize. Yes apoligize. My behaviour the last week was disruptive and immature. I had to really think about what I was doing and the purpose of Wikipedia to really grasp what I needed to grasp. The fact is that this is a site that allows people to add to the collective pool of logic and knowledge. It is non-discriminatory to your education level so long as a you contribute usefully and I had to remind myself that this IS A PRIVILEGE and is something to value and hold in esteem. While sometimes seeming arbitrary and quick the block does serve a purpose in stopping people from doing what I was doing and does help maintain good standards for everyone else. I will attempt to work on taking correction better because it is definitly a flaw of mine that I struggle to control. I once again would like to apoligize for being a pain in your butt. HellinaBucket ( talk) 19:35, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
I have a question for you. If I wanted to add the templates on my user page how would i do that? where would I do that? Specifically I'm trying to add "this user is a " HellinaBucket ( talk) 13:40, 9 May 2009 (UTC) Absolutely sorry to bug, Vegkilla is following me around and reverting edits I've made on articles. Specifically The article on Professional Bull Riders. I removed the info because it was trivia and not well wrote, however due to the level of scrutiny I am under I am very hesitant to do ANYTHING about it but would like to get someone elses opinion on the matter. Can you look into it at all? I would appreciate any assisance on this matter. Sorrr if you think the best thing to do is drop it let me know I DEF. do not want to be blocked again! —Preceding unsigned comment added by HellinaBucket ( talk • contribs) 10:00, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks Fisher, your help is appreciated. I created my first article today with the help of some others, check it out. Central High School(Pueblo, Colorado) HellinaBucket ( talk) 03:00, 11 May 2009 (UTC) Nicei lol'd -- Closedmouth ( talk) 12:50, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Franco BerardiAcording to the page on Franco Berardi, apparently there was a page about him, but its been deleted. Is there any reason for this on the log other than Notability, which is pretty eroneous (The guy is a touring philosopher who started the telestreet movement in italy and has been published in places like Semiotexte and others). Is there a record of the original page anywhere I can at least get info from? I'm not sure what went down that lead to the deletion (maybe it was a garbage article), but due to my inability to read the non english versions of the page, even the beginings of an english version would be neat. Cheers. Duck Monster ( talk) 14:47, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
About my User PageThanks for responding to my talk page first however if I may ask why is keeping a personal log considered a Personal attack?-- Sadbuttrue92 ( talk) 11:20, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
The Helping Hand Barnstar
articale QamilshliAssyrian (Assyria) just relegins (Christian) it’s not nation We know as a Muslim Arab people there are no nation called Assyrian it’s false name, we know there are few hundred Christians living in Qamishli ,and they came from Greece and Turkey as asylums and Syrian government give hem full right in Syria ,and most of them they went to Europe and America, Canada .we never hearted about Assyrian in Qamishli ,maybe a few people left in Qamishli not more than 200 people. Article QamishliAssyrian (Assyria) just relegins (Christian) it’s not nation We know as a Muslim Arab people there are no nation called Assyrian it’s false name, we know there are few hundred Christians living in Qamishli ,and they came from Greece and Turkey as asylums and Syrian government give hem full right in Syria ,and most of them they went to Europe and America, Canada .we never hearted about Assyrian in Qamishli ,maybe a few people left in Qamishli not more than 200 people. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.109.84.9 ( talk) 12:45, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Personal attacksHello. In the ANI page, you wrote the following about my dispute with Opinoso: When I reviewed the talk page, it looked like there were lots of personal attacks being thrown around on both sides. Don't worry; in a hundred years we'll all be dead, and other editors who can talk nicely to each other will sort out the right statistics. I reviewed it too. As far as I can see, there are no personal attacks by me there. Can you please point to me where have I made them, so that I can more easily avoid making them in the future? Thank you. Ninguém ( talk) 15:24, 8 May 2009 (UTC) And, please, if you can't find any personal attacks by me, can you state that at the same thread were you said I have made them? Thank you very much. Ninguém ( talk) 01:19, 9 May 2009 (UTC) Two little tales for your enjoyment:
: 11 May 2009
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 21:47, 11 May 2009 (UTC) 194x144x90x118Take a look at what 194x144x90x118 ( talk · contribs) has added to his talk page, what do you think the means by the IHO? Dougweller ( talk) 05:33, 12 May 2009 (UTC) It means in honor of, I laughed my ass of silly reading that stuff, it's simply beautiful.-- 194x144x90x118 ( talk) 16:26, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
QuestionAre you really both a lesbian and a Christian? How do you cope with the all the narrow minded pinheads?
Help if you had a chance, pleaseI've mostly finished my first contribution, Corset Controversy. Did I get it right? The style and form, I mean. Do you suppose you could take a look at it and tell me, please? Its in my sandbox. HeatherSmithfield ( talk) 23:48, 14 May 2009 (UTC)User:HeatherSmithfield
Its there. Thank you so much for your help. HeatherSmithfield User:123PatrickMC
: 18 May 2009
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 12:51, 19 May 2009 (UTC) Terence DaviesHello! It was me, unlogged-in, who restored the information about Terence Davies never having acted professionally. It's mentioned here: [2]. -- Chips Critic ( talk) 00:10, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
What the hell???I put the effort into writing a brand new article for wikipedia and you just go ahead and delete without consulting me and then INSULT me with a computer generate template rather than a human response? Don't even bother in the future, I hope to never run into you again. I expect an apology. Poetwhofailstoknowit ( talk) 16:07, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Don't be terse with me boy. You arrogantly I never read it. I have read all of wikipedia's rules and policies, I am very acquainted with them. Please restore my article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Poetwhofailstoknowit ( talk • contribs) 16:20, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Please CEASE AND DESIST your course of PASSIVE AGGRESSION AND ARROGANT ASSUMPTIONS. My article stands, you MUST RESTORE IT. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Poetwhofailstoknowit ( talk • contribs) 16:33, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
This is your last chance; restore the goddamn article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Poetwhofailstoknowit ( talk • contribs) 16:48, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Me apologise to her after she treated me with such contempt? I have a right mind to report her for admin abuse, never mind 'apologise'. Poetwhofailstoknowit ( talk) 17:10, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
I was speaking rhetorically. I'm not actually going to report you, because I recognise you were merely being passive aggressive, and we all know passive aggression is never punished in court, it is an insidious and sinister debating tactic by people who know the system well; hence they exploit all parts of the system they can and still to manage to get away with it. Thats why I won't report you, because you'll walk scotch free. After all, what use is it to have the admins investigating the admins? I hope to put this over us, but please do not be rude, passive aggressive or contemptuous of me ever again. Poetwhofailstoknowit ( talk) 17:16, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
*sigh* - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:36, 21 May 2009 (UTC) Hate to say it but a talk page block is in order. Enforce a total cool-down, that's what it took with me and this is oddly reminscent of my tirade about you (minus the sex preference part, your buisiness not mine) Hell in a Bucket ( talk) 17:39, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
COI in Mark Bell (journalist)I contend that a COI does not exist in this article. This is according to Wiki COI policy: "Do not edit Wikipedia to promote your own interests, or those of other individuals or of organizations, including employers, unless you are certain that the interests of Wikipedia remain paramount." I am asking you, in turn, to identify in this article where I am not neutral or where a conflict exists. This article only briefly mentions that Bell is an MTSU graduate and does not promote the school whatsoever. Therefore, the fact that I go to a school where he graduate (one year before I even started I might add) makes no difference and doesn't affect my ability to be objective. This is also not an "advertisement masquerading as an article," and does not fall under WP:SPAM. Multiple sources are cited in a variety of places that can be used to VERIFY all of the FACTS contained within the article. For these reasons, I ask that you please expedite this issue. WHoWhoOwl ( talk) 16:41, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
FisherQueen: Thank you for not nominating it for deletion. I do not know him personally. Only what I've heard from professors and been able to read about him in the paper and research articles he's left behind at MTSU. I do follow The Daily News Journal as it is the paper here in our city. He is a local celebrity and I've heard him speak at MTSU about how he fought his journalism battles while watching and helping his grandfather -- who had cancer which eventually killed him -- fight for his life. I do understand that because of this I have the POTENTIAL to be biased, but as I've stated before and as you've agreed -- the article has a neutral tone. I will most likely abstain from writing any further on the subject if you feel that is appropriate. WHoWhoOwl ( talk) 16:53, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Thank you. You do the same. WHoWhoOwl ( talk) 17:02, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
I believe that. I really do. I can only imagine the number of self-promoting band pages that have been deleted! ;) Good luck with this fellow up above. He/She is being very rude. WHoWhoOwl ( talk) 17:09, 21 May 2009 (UTC) (Jewels) User talk:86.40.209.112I take the point, but he's had warnings, he's had advice, he's dissembled about his his vandalism. Even unintentional, I regarded this as disruptive and unlikely to assist with his next unblock. What would you have done? Rodhull andemu 20:40, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Neslgrad09Hi FisherQueen, Would appreciate your candid thoughts on my actions regarding User:Neslgrad09. Based on Fred's comments at my talk page, I reversed my actions, but would appreciate your review not as it regards your upholding my block, but if the block and the page protection was heavy handed on my part. Greatly appreciate any constructive criticism. Thanks! Hiberniantears ( talk) 03:33, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Can I havethe last 4 hours of my life back? Law type! snype? 14:19, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
You really outta learn how to dodge the paper trail. You should have used IRC for one thing, and sky writing for the other! Law type! snype? 23:22, 25 May 2009 (UTC) User:ДжокерWere you getting Joker emails from this one? I was about to block them indefinitely for being a creeper but it seems you got to them first. I don't even edit that often so I have no idea why they would email me. Darth Griz98 19:44, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
TheTwittererGood point. I just don't want them getting away with it. -- Tm1000 ( talk) 21:08, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
In case you haven't noticed,Or you don't have his page on your watchlist Andrewwisne ( talk · contribs), has made rebuttals to your responses.— Dæ dαlus Contribs 22:14, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Thank youFor blocking that user. I think I need a breather.— Dæ dαlus Contribs 23:47, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
: 25 May 2009
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 03:32, 26 May 2009 (UTC) QuestionI was creating a new article on an american aUTHOR/mERCENARY, i'VE FOUND FIVE SOURCES BUT THE ARTICLE IS STILL SHORT. dO YOU THINK YOU CAN LOOK AT IT AND TELL ME iF i ESTABLISHED ENOUGH NOTABILITY TO KEEP IT HERE. ty, IT'S THE ARTICLE ON Frank Camper. Thats really the only thing I need to know, just don't want it to be deleted. Hell in a Bucket ( talk) 11:20, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Another QuestionI have a complete listing of Franks books and Have one reference page for all of them. Should I attempt to find different sites for all his books or do I cite the entire section as one? Hell in a Bucket ( talk) 13:56, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Wisne (2nd nomination)I have rewritten Andy Wisne in a neutral, encyclopedic fashion. You wrote that "If I'm wrong and he really is notable, then presumably someone other than himself will inevitably be inspired to write about him." Your comment inspired me to rewrite the article. I hope you can take a look at it and reevaluate your position at the AfD. Cunard ( talk) 08:16, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Edward Low vandalI was looking into the latest incarnation, User:Aranesp, while you were blocking him. The user talk page is...interesting, with comments dating back to 2007 and barnstars dating back to 2005, for a user registered last month. It seems the user created his talk page by copy/pasting an old version of User talk:Staecker. It was supplemented with some barnstars from User:Jehochman's subpage, with the username changed. Seemed like an awful lot of effort to create a respectable persona. Sure enough, one wasn't enough for him: check out User talk:Weiserthanu, please. Maralia ( talk) 17:15, 27 May 2009 (UTC) Likewise User:Lawtonlawdawg; see [3]. Maralia ( talk) 04:32, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Kitten
PirateSmackK
Arrrr! has given you a
kitten! Kittens promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Kittens must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{ subst:Kitten}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message! I've seen that you deny a lot of unblock request; that's the only thing I don't like about you. PirateSmackK Arrrr! 18:33, 29 May 2009 (UTC) |