FisherQueen
| |
---|---|
![]() Actually, someone named "Rockpocket" voted keep, so it's 2 to 2 at this point. As to the arsonist question, WIkipedia lables lots of people as "terrorist" who have been convicted of conspiracy to commit terrorism, like the Lackawana Six. Not calling someone who was convicted (and pled guilty) of planning to commit arson an arsonist seems like it displays a distinct point of view. Tom Ketchum ( talk) 17:21, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for removing the link from the article. That is the third time it was inserted over the last few days by 88.224.58.11, 88.229.163.136, and then Celebimansur. The Anons appear to be SPAs from Turkey. I will watch the Aging article that was hit too. I will left the same warning on the Anons talk that you left on Celebimansur's page. Ward20 ( talk) 19:22, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
How do I report Mayalld for WP Personal Attacks, he does nothing but continuely excuse and remove editors on my work and page and says nasty comments, its all because my article got kept, and he dont like it, now every thing I do he delets or removes, it arasment.I tried to stop him being so silly and left him a barnstar but he still leaves nasty comments19:36, 30 March 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Diamonddannyboy ( talk • contribs)
I made the mistake of submitting the article before I was finished, because I wanted to preserve a snapshot before elaborating in more detail. What exactly is required to be considered "notable"? They currently have a video playing on the Logo networks New Now Next video program. I assume that once I include the fact that the band signed with SonyBMG in 2003, debuted their video for their single on MTVU in winter and will make its US premiere at SXSW that would be enough? David Fricke from Rolling Stone has raved about the band (a fact mentioned on multiple music sites). Can I get access to the text of the incomplete article before it was deleted so I can make sure it meets requirements? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Autonym ( talk • contribs) 20:23, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Are you an administrator?
I note with interest the conversation in the talk page of the Churches of Christ Article.
Thank you for reverting the vandalism to my talk page. I was just about to head off to bed when i saw it. Your block notice is kind of funny too. Anyways thanks again and good night, talk to you later. Anna AnnaJGrant ( talk) 12:40, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Hey there, I was in process of creating an article that was deleted: alonetone- I probably should have not hit "save" yet... If you like I can word the article with more direction concerning "significance" - alonetone is currently the only music platform that is open source, run by a musician community, and is not backed by a company. It does not run advertising. It is completely separate from business concerns and focuses solely on connecting artists with other artists and their listeners - without monetary exchange. Sudarawilliams ( talk) 16:12, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Believe me, they need more editors over at http://eo.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C4%88efpa%C4%9Do !
This is funny! Is the template your own creation or should I give praise to someone else. Either way, it made me laugh :)
Hi FisherQueen, Thanks for your quick help with that FactsAreFacts thing; for future reference, should I have approached the user on his talk page more personally or gone to Requests for Comment first, or does this kind of issue generally fall under immediate-response vandalism? Thanks again, Wikimancer ( talk) 21:35, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Block of User:200.214.44.134I saw that you just reviewed the block of this user and I think a 3RR violation block is appropriate, though you mentioned in the block summary that he ignored warnings. In this case, I think that it was the warnings issued were inappropriate, as this wasn't a simple case of vandalism. It was an edit war. Just letting you know of my take on it.-- Urban Rose 22:03, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
No worries this a troll (there's a blog called The Wiki Defender that is a pastiche of what a guy with a "I am the last defender of the wiki" attitude would be). I suspect this is a copycat :) -- lucasbfr talk 10:18, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Looks like they're back already with a shiny new IP address: 87.112.85.170. -- BrucePodger ( talk) 21:41, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
LOL, nice one. Not what I was expecting, particularly since I saw it before the post itself. -- BrucePodger ( talk) 21:50, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Current vandalism to muscular system by anon IP. Could you block? Reported at AIV, but it's always slow to empty. WLU ( talk) 15:24, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi just wondered why you opted for a PROD rather than CSD? Its surely just nonsense. It relates to Brunswick Rovers Football Club which I have CSDed today (It was sp del yesterday too). Kind regards -- Bp Eps - t@lk 15:59, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
yeh but they might be looking for help on runescape! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Z3Z1AAA ( talk • contribs) 16:00, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
yeh i know but runescape players might be looking for some help!
well they do, i know many game sites but many runescape players also go on wikipedia
WHAT YOU DOING MAN!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Z3Z1AAA ( talk • contribs) 16:12, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
there hundreds more like Silverlight Sword you can never find hahahahaha--Superhacker —Preceding unsigned comment added by Z3Z1AAA ( talk • contribs)
I've seen many people using the template when some regular is extremely uncivil to others. I've got Sennen goroshi ( talk · contribs)'s endless mockeries and 4th time FUCK.(threes in one week) Regardless of my suggestion to him not to use it, he keeps saying that. So I think my using the template is valid. -- Appletrees ( talk) 16:14, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
I dont need the consensus of a collective group of "self described nerds without college degrees." No more disputes, you win.. but, the fact remains other stations do this, and don't have militant self described "editors" patroling their websights LOSERS!!! Adios dropouts! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bandit5257 ( talk • contribs)
I feel embarrassed that you were involved in such a childish matter as the bickering between Appletrees and myself. So I shall try to be mature and state "thanks for the fucking comments regard the suitability of the word fuck" Now I am worried, I was not trying to be offensive with my use of "fuck", I think all hell would break loose, if one day I actually tried to be offensive with my vulgar vocabulary. kawai onna matane. domo arigatou - as the locals here in Japan say (not that I am a local, I just live here, as is very obvious, due to my appalling Japanese) Sennen goroshi ( talk) 18:25, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
I'd appreciate your opinion/involvement in a (so far) minor squabble.
Actually, this is quite helpful :o) as the person who keeps doing this is on Tor and the IP address can be blocked accordingly each time. Useful giveaway ;o) ➨ REDVEЯS is always ready to dynamically make tea 12:20, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi, is the user name below cute enough? I'm the artist formerly known as Bondage Bitch. I fell off laughing when I read your comments about Clinton. Alright, I get it. Wikipedia is censored. I can live with that; I'd imagined me and fellow travellers working in the background without anyone noticing, but I can see that it's not worth the backlash if someone did notice. couple of things though: I logged that name in good faith, I didn't think it was breaking a rule. can I keep it as a read-only name for my own entertainment? I think it's fun logging on with that. (Yeh I would, wouldn't I?) (I don't want to spoil other people's fun but really! "Bound to the A"? What a cover story! I've been bound to the A a few times and not just for the beginning.) Star Bell ( talk) 09:58, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Vandalism to my userpage was bound to happen eventually. Thanks for the revert. Jasynnash2 ( talk) 11:51, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi there, thanks for the welcome. I have a quick question...I am trying to move an article titled Bob kennett to a properly capitalized article named Bob Kennett. How do I go about doing this? Thanks. Threehundredthirtyseven ( talk) 12:13, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
I assure you that user has absolutely nothing to do with me. I guess this is a classic example of the boy who cried wolf - sort of, just i never denied the fact that i thought Barneca was a bad admin, so why would I deny it now. Anyway I figure there are three explanations:
By the way, I note that lunar satin denied User:Dark3345's application for unblock because he/she thought that I was DARK3345 but i have nothing to do with Dark3345. Let user:Luna Santin know that he made a mistake if you like. I cant becaue his talk page is locked for some reason. 79.77.136.72 ( talk) 18:37, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi, you commented on AndyCook's review, I'm not sure if i have replied to it correctly, but i have attempted to reply to your comment, i decided it would be in both our best interests to post a copy of what i have said here, i hope this does not bother you. "in reply to your clause for the blocking of my account, i have updated my account with a safer password, and the reason which i care to keep this account is because andycook is my real name, and id very much like to make some valid corrections, and expansions of incorrect pages and stubs. I don't really have any proof, nor do I expect anyone to believe that my real name is the name of this account, but i can assure you that i wouldn't take the time to get my account back if i planned to vandalize wikipedia. I hope there is some way that i can prove that my intentions here are for the greater good, as i would be very pleased to be welcomed into the wikipedia community. anyways, sorry for any wasted time."
Hi Fisher Queen, I found your comment on this page about assuming good faith so useful after seeing how you had put: {{dated prod|concern = {{fq-prod}}|month = April|day = 11|year = 2008|time = 15:22|timestamp = 20080411152235}} on the Gordon Tait. But I would be grateful if you could spend a moment to explain why you put this up two minutes after the page had got started and when it new additions were still being added. Whilst I feel that the admonition to assume good faith is such a wonderful pillar if the wikipedia community, it sometimes concerns me that this assumption is abused by people who unnecessarily put such tags onn pages where the cyber-ink is scarcely dry. No doubt you have a good reason to explain this behaviour and look forward to heaing it. Harrypotter ( talk) 15:34, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
![]() Please learn to separate factual edits from vandalism. The edits made from this IP address were merely factual edits to Orangemike's page to reflect Orangemike's sudden fame resulting from his mention on the Toucher and Rich show. Deleting factual edits constitutes vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.104.249.90 ( talk) 19:58, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Why the removal of the tags? Please explain? J. D. Redding 16:06, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
The users making POV edits in question have attacked me. What options do I have? One has stalked me. The users also work in tandum. This is not new conduct for either user. We have had conflicts before. ScienceApologist has been sanctioned by arbitrattion committe. Mabey both have been, but I do not seek the contributors out .. they do ... I am sorry you seem not to know anything about the subject. The article is biased now. Is there anothertag I can use? last questions here ... Why must someone other than me restore the tag? Is that a requirement to place a NPOV tag ... to have a second motion to keep it? J. D. Redding 16:22, 15 April 2008 (UTC) No comment? J. D. Redding 16:44, 15 April 2008 (UTC) I guess not .... J. D. Redding 16:57, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the response. I hate being stalked by ScienceApologist. Anyways, removing relevant reliable information from the article makes many articles biased. Omission of facts. I find it surprising that i use the same criteria for many articles i have done and improved (ex, expert, scientist, etc ...) ... but only when he edits science articles I have been editing, information is removed. POV pushing and attacks on me also. A tag should be there. Tag to clarify that there is not inforantion is absent in the topic. How is anyone to know that there are reliable sources of information (government documents and patents) and other information (for other public sources) if it is removed? Removing different sources of knowledge is not representing all them. Thanks ... Sincerely, J. D. Redding 05:04, 16 April 2008 (UTC) (ps., people need to learn the historical method and apply it to all types of sources ...) Huh,i never said im an admin. -.- —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dasaa ( talk • contribs) 20:22, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi, are you still an administrator? I just want to COMPLAIN and NOTIFY you about a threat to block my user (I am not familiar how to deal with this guy and vandalism). I was emailed by some editors per private message that many Filipino editors were out to muscle me and to ban me, due to my prophecies, inter alia. I told them that WikiPedia is merely one of 140 forums and places I registered and joined (I was banned in 20 wiccans and atheist forums), and I don't care if guys are stupid and unruly. I debunked FEAR in my life. I have high respects to you, since I knew you were so impartial, and when you helped in re-creating [[Florentino Floro]. But this User:Maxschmelling. User talk:Maxschmelling had been pestering me [2] on Philippine news editing. He had gone wild, and he even deleted my modern wrist watch record auction from Reuters news. I ignored him since he must have had a family mess or job crisis, inter alia. I discern and let these go. Is this guy an administrator? He claimed that he is not a Filipino and not related to Filipino but has lots of fear to show his nationality. I had used WikiPedia Psalm 109 and 73 since when I read Wiki rules, I could not defend myself against vendetta or cover-up and hidden agenda by editors and administrators who were out to muscle me, for reasons, as personal defense based on Bible and spirituality, since the world is full of rage. Please enlighten me on the power of this guy to block and to threaten to block when all my edits are not news. And what is my remedy against him? Can you block him? Thanks. -- Florentino floro ( talk) 06:29, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello again. I was the one who added the speedy delete tag to the skylurker page. I have had a conversation on [[User_talk:BananaFiend|my talk page] with User:skylurker. I tagged with speedy delete as nonsense, which seems to indicate that the article does not make any sense. While I believe that it did not have any place on wikipedia (and could be speedy deleted as such) I think it more properly was deletable as a personal theory (non-notable). The user seems relatively personable and I think the "nonsense" message might have been a bit insulting. I think perhaps in future I will edit the user notification added by twinkle automatically to be a little less harsh where necessary. Any advice on this one? Sorry to bother you BananaFiend ( talk) 09:41, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Well, how is this for proof? It is part of a documentary from History Channel with the EXACT same phenomenon, however my material consists of a continouos study of > 2 months, hundreds of HQ pictures , some picture series with about 200 in them and even a close encounter at 30-50 meters, where I could see the "inside" of a translucent sphere with binos. So far for "nonsense"? http://www.history.com/video.do?name=UFO_Hunters&bcpid=1431564226&bclid=1390821699&bctid=1389988076 JOHNupsidedown ( talk) 09:13, 24 September 2008 (UTC) Need help at Shannara....Multiple vandals....who all happen to be my friends too. UGH. (Try not to block me too, but if you do, oh well. the_ed 17 18:30, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm not quite old enough to completely understand...But my mom always says stuff like that about him, too, so I kinda understand.... But (on a different note) is it alright if I stole your style-thing (I'm not sure what to call it) for my talk page etc.? I'm going to change the color eventually, but...if it isn't, I'll just revert it. the_ed 17 15:50, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
I really think the people on here should lighten up. Stating a Haggis is a Ginger and hairy with 2 legs longer than other, they are often seen running around hills. Very shy fury animals, which when skinned make traditional Scottish cuisine, was mearly fun. Crikey what sad people you must be to be offended —Preceding unsigned comment added by Samismarried ( talk • contribs) 22:01, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
hey i'm really suprised by this. we do a tv show online that makes absolutely zero money. we do it for educational purposes only for the benefit of doctors and patients out there. we dont sell anything. i added a video of a show we did with the most respected man in the vitamin industry talking about the importance of quality control in the vitamimn industry. its just like a jazzy seminar. if i am going about doing it the wrong way i would appreciate input on how to do it right. i created a new section titled "educational video" and put the episode there. we pay for our own bandwidth, we dont have tile adds, we are just trying to help educate the world... —Preceding unsigned comment added by NPTV ( talk • contribs) 22:28, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for blocking him!!! ...but I also owe you a "thanks" for clearing the autoblock. =D the_ed 17 15:12, 17 April 2008 (UTC) I appreciate you more than you can ever know! Thanks for the comment. I sure hope we can get some of the Anon editors to talk about their concerns. I tried to speculate on what I think is the matter, but trying to re-edit without talking doesn't seem to work. John Park ( talk) 18:33, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Dear Fisherqueen, I kindly ask you to unblock my account as I have sorted out the matter that made it look like a communal account. I had let some people air their views through my account unaware of the fact that it is against Wikipedia policy. I apologize and appeal to you to kindly reinstate the account. This mistake will not be repeated. Thankyou, User:bmjmureithi.( 70.11.104.32 ( talk) 21:33, 17 April 2008 (UTC))
Hi FQ, Trolling wiki in boredom, I come upon this. Remember Mr. Barefoot from months back, User:Creepy Crawler? Is it worth adding all the socks there now, or should I/we wait until they're back at it? WLU ( talk) 18:43, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
sources??? Aren't you supposed to "assume good faith"??? Jayneofthejungle ( talk) 21:29, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Just because I quoted WR doesn't mean that I post there. I mean, you obviously read it too, don't you? Are you embarrassed about that? Probably not, because it's the "in"-place to be. Since Post-postmodernist thought is oldhat, it's only a matter of time before Post-post-postmodernism takes over. Why don't we just get it over with and start the article already?? Jayneofthejungle ( talk) 21:49, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
I personally think that if they change the license, they will have to either get Awbrey's permission or delete the contributions from all articles. Wikipedia does not control any copyrights by definition.
All edits are made on specific terms; You cannot simply arbitrarily change those terms. And the license does not give Wikipedia the rights to use Jon Awbrey's name as they choose. In any case, other people are beginning to understand the implication of all of this and hopefully, you will all have learned something because of this. good night Jayneofthejungle ( talk) 23:41, 20 April 2008 (UTC) Churches of Christ articleThere's a new user at the article ( Mark0880) putting in a lot of information that all seems to be unreferenced. I've talked to him on several occasions and he seems to have his heart in the right place, but he keeps inserting information that seems much more appropriate for a sermon or tract than an encyclopedia [5] [6]. Since you have experience with this article, I thought I'd come to you first and see if you could suggest a tact to take with him. I was just vandal fighting and drawn to the artile, I'm not really familiar with using references such as the Bible on articles dealing with religious matters. Thanks! Redrocket ( talk) 02:51, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
![]()
I swear this is why we need a CSD tag for hoaxes/joke articles. "Aerobic Beading with Richard Simmons"? "Snow White and the Seven Beads"? This reads more like a bored kid in school made this up. Wildthing61476 ( talk) 15:46, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Hiya FQ, hoping the weather finds you sunny and your bank balance finds you rich. I've a question for you - if you would be so kind, have a gander at the history of Richard Ofshe, particularly the contributions of 89.159.146.254 ( talk · contribs). You can see in my AIV report why I've been reverting - a source of "personal knowledge - Richard Ofshe" raises obvious WP:RS and WP:COI issues. Steve Crossin declined to block and fair enough given his rational, but hasn't responded to my question on his talk page. I'm perfectly willing to allow that this may not be an AIV matter, what I'd really like though is an option for a case like this, when after numerous postings on their talk page, there's been no reply and ongoing edits to the Ofshe page. I'm aware of WP:PARENT - I'm looking for advice, not a block, and am keenly aware of my shortcomings in comprehension of many policies and guidelines. As always, the distilled wisdom of your many moons as an admin is the only beverage that will slake my thirst. I should write hallmark cards for wikipedians. WLU ( talk) 15:10, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
He falsely calls me a vandal as I restoring the previous compact version and his behavior is highly uncivil and suits personal attack. I don't think the vulgarism should be included in the article, so I will raise RFC to resolve this absurd dispute. -- Appletrees ( talk) 15:31, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
You side him which is not clearly a compromised version with me or other anon at all. You not only reverted to include the vulgarism, but also well organized alignment. You're also involved in voicing your opinion on this, so you're not a meditator. I request you to revert it to the previous version before Sennen goroshi vandalise. (Why didn't you give a warning to him? That is also the fact that you're not neutral.)-- Appletrees ( talk) 16:13, 23 April 2008 (UTC) we talked the other day. I will make it brief. see her myspace http://www.myspace.com/JuliannaRoseMauriello I do not understand. How a few admins can claim anything different. the problem is is to alot of people she is a "loli". Many people will not even admit they are attracted to her. But its strange out of ALL the editors to her page over the last 2 years, MOST are the same exact people. interesting? They ignore her myspace and her imdb.com to satisfy themselves? This will never end, even if she would do an interview these people on wikipedia would STILL claim she was straight because it ruins their fantasy. I WORKED with her for FOUR DAYS straight. I MET her wife, I KNOW for a FACT. I believe that most if not all of the editors on wikipedia ALSO KNOW for a fact she is gay. They just dont want to admit it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.0.175.94 ( talk) 11:23, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
LOL are you SERIOUS??? Here, let me hand you these glasses once... Read her comments, look at the page. oh btw: http://youtube.com/jburwasser —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.0.175.94 ( talk) 11:41, 24 April 2008 (UTC) (sighs) as usual... why waste my time, you all know it all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.0.175.94 ( talk) 11:39, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
"Because gay couples cannot marry in New York, and because the marriage age in Canada is 18, any claim that she is married is so profoundly improbable that it would have to be verified by several very good sources. " Um, New York is not in Canada. And many couples are "married" in new york where the actual legal age to be married is 14 with parental consent. Just so you know some facts here... it was legal for gay people to marry in New York for a period of 7 months in 2007. Suggest studying up some. Doesn't matter though believe what you will —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.0.175.94 ( talk) 11:56, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
I did not understand why you removed what I saw as a legit article. help me to understand why you would remove a article that meets a NPOV? I comply with wiki rules, sorry I did not see the messages and understand, I really thought a troll kept removing the page, sorry. Cathy cathytreks ( talk) 17:44, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
cathytreks ( talk) 17:52, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Just saying howdy and a thanks for your continued reverts of nonsense vandalism and other services to humanity. I see you also are a fan of "I Can Haz Cheezburger" or other lolcats sites. My kind of person! LOL! Montanabw (talk) 03:59, 26 April 2008 (UTC) Don't threaten me. Unblock my LaruaWA11 account now, I will make as many accounts as it takes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vilecremence ( talk • contribs) 12:02, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
My article, ( phone song) is improved. Tell me if it's alright... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ehccheehcche ( talk • contribs) 22:10, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Ektron CMS400.NET is has no information linked to it from List_of_content_management_systems. Please allow at least a brief decription. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grimmjaw08 ( talk • contribs) 17:22, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
I am still very new at this. It will take me a few days to digest the info. I know I have a conflict of interest, but since the company is noted by outside industry publications on a regular basis, I do not think I will have any trouble citing the neccessary resources. Thanks again. I tried my best as a non-admin. But can you step in here. Two users in a dispute and both being rather uncivil. I am starting to lose my cool on this one..may have. So please can you step in and take charge here. I already suggested Tea and Biscuits and made it clear that both were at fault and should just seek mediation. Thought it was resolved but it appears the user did have diffs. I looked at all 12 of them. 11 seems semi-fine as it was a dumb vandal. But as I stated it was harsh to point it out. Rgoodermote 23:25, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
|
FisherQueen
| |
---|---|
![]() Actually, someone named "Rockpocket" voted keep, so it's 2 to 2 at this point. As to the arsonist question, WIkipedia lables lots of people as "terrorist" who have been convicted of conspiracy to commit terrorism, like the Lackawana Six. Not calling someone who was convicted (and pled guilty) of planning to commit arson an arsonist seems like it displays a distinct point of view. Tom Ketchum ( talk) 17:21, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for removing the link from the article. That is the third time it was inserted over the last few days by 88.224.58.11, 88.229.163.136, and then Celebimansur. The Anons appear to be SPAs from Turkey. I will watch the Aging article that was hit too. I will left the same warning on the Anons talk that you left on Celebimansur's page. Ward20 ( talk) 19:22, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
How do I report Mayalld for WP Personal Attacks, he does nothing but continuely excuse and remove editors on my work and page and says nasty comments, its all because my article got kept, and he dont like it, now every thing I do he delets or removes, it arasment.I tried to stop him being so silly and left him a barnstar but he still leaves nasty comments19:36, 30 March 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Diamonddannyboy ( talk • contribs)
I made the mistake of submitting the article before I was finished, because I wanted to preserve a snapshot before elaborating in more detail. What exactly is required to be considered "notable"? They currently have a video playing on the Logo networks New Now Next video program. I assume that once I include the fact that the band signed with SonyBMG in 2003, debuted their video for their single on MTVU in winter and will make its US premiere at SXSW that would be enough? David Fricke from Rolling Stone has raved about the band (a fact mentioned on multiple music sites). Can I get access to the text of the incomplete article before it was deleted so I can make sure it meets requirements? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Autonym ( talk • contribs) 20:23, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Are you an administrator?
I note with interest the conversation in the talk page of the Churches of Christ Article.
Thank you for reverting the vandalism to my talk page. I was just about to head off to bed when i saw it. Your block notice is kind of funny too. Anyways thanks again and good night, talk to you later. Anna AnnaJGrant ( talk) 12:40, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Hey there, I was in process of creating an article that was deleted: alonetone- I probably should have not hit "save" yet... If you like I can word the article with more direction concerning "significance" - alonetone is currently the only music platform that is open source, run by a musician community, and is not backed by a company. It does not run advertising. It is completely separate from business concerns and focuses solely on connecting artists with other artists and their listeners - without monetary exchange. Sudarawilliams ( talk) 16:12, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Believe me, they need more editors over at http://eo.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C4%88efpa%C4%9Do !
This is funny! Is the template your own creation or should I give praise to someone else. Either way, it made me laugh :)
Hi FisherQueen, Thanks for your quick help with that FactsAreFacts thing; for future reference, should I have approached the user on his talk page more personally or gone to Requests for Comment first, or does this kind of issue generally fall under immediate-response vandalism? Thanks again, Wikimancer ( talk) 21:35, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Block of User:200.214.44.134I saw that you just reviewed the block of this user and I think a 3RR violation block is appropriate, though you mentioned in the block summary that he ignored warnings. In this case, I think that it was the warnings issued were inappropriate, as this wasn't a simple case of vandalism. It was an edit war. Just letting you know of my take on it.-- Urban Rose 22:03, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
No worries this a troll (there's a blog called The Wiki Defender that is a pastiche of what a guy with a "I am the last defender of the wiki" attitude would be). I suspect this is a copycat :) -- lucasbfr talk 10:18, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Looks like they're back already with a shiny new IP address: 87.112.85.170. -- BrucePodger ( talk) 21:41, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
LOL, nice one. Not what I was expecting, particularly since I saw it before the post itself. -- BrucePodger ( talk) 21:50, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Current vandalism to muscular system by anon IP. Could you block? Reported at AIV, but it's always slow to empty. WLU ( talk) 15:24, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi just wondered why you opted for a PROD rather than CSD? Its surely just nonsense. It relates to Brunswick Rovers Football Club which I have CSDed today (It was sp del yesterday too). Kind regards -- Bp Eps - t@lk 15:59, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
yeh but they might be looking for help on runescape! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Z3Z1AAA ( talk • contribs) 16:00, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
yeh i know but runescape players might be looking for some help!
well they do, i know many game sites but many runescape players also go on wikipedia
WHAT YOU DOING MAN!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Z3Z1AAA ( talk • contribs) 16:12, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
there hundreds more like Silverlight Sword you can never find hahahahaha--Superhacker —Preceding unsigned comment added by Z3Z1AAA ( talk • contribs)
I've seen many people using the template when some regular is extremely uncivil to others. I've got Sennen goroshi ( talk · contribs)'s endless mockeries and 4th time FUCK.(threes in one week) Regardless of my suggestion to him not to use it, he keeps saying that. So I think my using the template is valid. -- Appletrees ( talk) 16:14, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
I dont need the consensus of a collective group of "self described nerds without college degrees." No more disputes, you win.. but, the fact remains other stations do this, and don't have militant self described "editors" patroling their websights LOSERS!!! Adios dropouts! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bandit5257 ( talk • contribs)
I feel embarrassed that you were involved in such a childish matter as the bickering between Appletrees and myself. So I shall try to be mature and state "thanks for the fucking comments regard the suitability of the word fuck" Now I am worried, I was not trying to be offensive with my use of "fuck", I think all hell would break loose, if one day I actually tried to be offensive with my vulgar vocabulary. kawai onna matane. domo arigatou - as the locals here in Japan say (not that I am a local, I just live here, as is very obvious, due to my appalling Japanese) Sennen goroshi ( talk) 18:25, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
I'd appreciate your opinion/involvement in a (so far) minor squabble.
Actually, this is quite helpful :o) as the person who keeps doing this is on Tor and the IP address can be blocked accordingly each time. Useful giveaway ;o) ➨ REDVEЯS is always ready to dynamically make tea 12:20, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi, is the user name below cute enough? I'm the artist formerly known as Bondage Bitch. I fell off laughing when I read your comments about Clinton. Alright, I get it. Wikipedia is censored. I can live with that; I'd imagined me and fellow travellers working in the background without anyone noticing, but I can see that it's not worth the backlash if someone did notice. couple of things though: I logged that name in good faith, I didn't think it was breaking a rule. can I keep it as a read-only name for my own entertainment? I think it's fun logging on with that. (Yeh I would, wouldn't I?) (I don't want to spoil other people's fun but really! "Bound to the A"? What a cover story! I've been bound to the A a few times and not just for the beginning.) Star Bell ( talk) 09:58, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Vandalism to my userpage was bound to happen eventually. Thanks for the revert. Jasynnash2 ( talk) 11:51, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi there, thanks for the welcome. I have a quick question...I am trying to move an article titled Bob kennett to a properly capitalized article named Bob Kennett. How do I go about doing this? Thanks. Threehundredthirtyseven ( talk) 12:13, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
I assure you that user has absolutely nothing to do with me. I guess this is a classic example of the boy who cried wolf - sort of, just i never denied the fact that i thought Barneca was a bad admin, so why would I deny it now. Anyway I figure there are three explanations:
By the way, I note that lunar satin denied User:Dark3345's application for unblock because he/she thought that I was DARK3345 but i have nothing to do with Dark3345. Let user:Luna Santin know that he made a mistake if you like. I cant becaue his talk page is locked for some reason. 79.77.136.72 ( talk) 18:37, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi, you commented on AndyCook's review, I'm not sure if i have replied to it correctly, but i have attempted to reply to your comment, i decided it would be in both our best interests to post a copy of what i have said here, i hope this does not bother you. "in reply to your clause for the blocking of my account, i have updated my account with a safer password, and the reason which i care to keep this account is because andycook is my real name, and id very much like to make some valid corrections, and expansions of incorrect pages and stubs. I don't really have any proof, nor do I expect anyone to believe that my real name is the name of this account, but i can assure you that i wouldn't take the time to get my account back if i planned to vandalize wikipedia. I hope there is some way that i can prove that my intentions here are for the greater good, as i would be very pleased to be welcomed into the wikipedia community. anyways, sorry for any wasted time."
Hi Fisher Queen, I found your comment on this page about assuming good faith so useful after seeing how you had put: {{dated prod|concern = {{fq-prod}}|month = April|day = 11|year = 2008|time = 15:22|timestamp = 20080411152235}} on the Gordon Tait. But I would be grateful if you could spend a moment to explain why you put this up two minutes after the page had got started and when it new additions were still being added. Whilst I feel that the admonition to assume good faith is such a wonderful pillar if the wikipedia community, it sometimes concerns me that this assumption is abused by people who unnecessarily put such tags onn pages where the cyber-ink is scarcely dry. No doubt you have a good reason to explain this behaviour and look forward to heaing it. Harrypotter ( talk) 15:34, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
![]() Please learn to separate factual edits from vandalism. The edits made from this IP address were merely factual edits to Orangemike's page to reflect Orangemike's sudden fame resulting from his mention on the Toucher and Rich show. Deleting factual edits constitutes vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.104.249.90 ( talk) 19:58, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Why the removal of the tags? Please explain? J. D. Redding 16:06, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
The users making POV edits in question have attacked me. What options do I have? One has stalked me. The users also work in tandum. This is not new conduct for either user. We have had conflicts before. ScienceApologist has been sanctioned by arbitrattion committe. Mabey both have been, but I do not seek the contributors out .. they do ... I am sorry you seem not to know anything about the subject. The article is biased now. Is there anothertag I can use? last questions here ... Why must someone other than me restore the tag? Is that a requirement to place a NPOV tag ... to have a second motion to keep it? J. D. Redding 16:22, 15 April 2008 (UTC) No comment? J. D. Redding 16:44, 15 April 2008 (UTC) I guess not .... J. D. Redding 16:57, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the response. I hate being stalked by ScienceApologist. Anyways, removing relevant reliable information from the article makes many articles biased. Omission of facts. I find it surprising that i use the same criteria for many articles i have done and improved (ex, expert, scientist, etc ...) ... but only when he edits science articles I have been editing, information is removed. POV pushing and attacks on me also. A tag should be there. Tag to clarify that there is not inforantion is absent in the topic. How is anyone to know that there are reliable sources of information (government documents and patents) and other information (for other public sources) if it is removed? Removing different sources of knowledge is not representing all them. Thanks ... Sincerely, J. D. Redding 05:04, 16 April 2008 (UTC) (ps., people need to learn the historical method and apply it to all types of sources ...) Huh,i never said im an admin. -.- —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dasaa ( talk • contribs) 20:22, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi, are you still an administrator? I just want to COMPLAIN and NOTIFY you about a threat to block my user (I am not familiar how to deal with this guy and vandalism). I was emailed by some editors per private message that many Filipino editors were out to muscle me and to ban me, due to my prophecies, inter alia. I told them that WikiPedia is merely one of 140 forums and places I registered and joined (I was banned in 20 wiccans and atheist forums), and I don't care if guys are stupid and unruly. I debunked FEAR in my life. I have high respects to you, since I knew you were so impartial, and when you helped in re-creating [[Florentino Floro]. But this User:Maxschmelling. User talk:Maxschmelling had been pestering me [2] on Philippine news editing. He had gone wild, and he even deleted my modern wrist watch record auction from Reuters news. I ignored him since he must have had a family mess or job crisis, inter alia. I discern and let these go. Is this guy an administrator? He claimed that he is not a Filipino and not related to Filipino but has lots of fear to show his nationality. I had used WikiPedia Psalm 109 and 73 since when I read Wiki rules, I could not defend myself against vendetta or cover-up and hidden agenda by editors and administrators who were out to muscle me, for reasons, as personal defense based on Bible and spirituality, since the world is full of rage. Please enlighten me on the power of this guy to block and to threaten to block when all my edits are not news. And what is my remedy against him? Can you block him? Thanks. -- Florentino floro ( talk) 06:29, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello again. I was the one who added the speedy delete tag to the skylurker page. I have had a conversation on [[User_talk:BananaFiend|my talk page] with User:skylurker. I tagged with speedy delete as nonsense, which seems to indicate that the article does not make any sense. While I believe that it did not have any place on wikipedia (and could be speedy deleted as such) I think it more properly was deletable as a personal theory (non-notable). The user seems relatively personable and I think the "nonsense" message might have been a bit insulting. I think perhaps in future I will edit the user notification added by twinkle automatically to be a little less harsh where necessary. Any advice on this one? Sorry to bother you BananaFiend ( talk) 09:41, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Well, how is this for proof? It is part of a documentary from History Channel with the EXACT same phenomenon, however my material consists of a continouos study of > 2 months, hundreds of HQ pictures , some picture series with about 200 in them and even a close encounter at 30-50 meters, where I could see the "inside" of a translucent sphere with binos. So far for "nonsense"? http://www.history.com/video.do?name=UFO_Hunters&bcpid=1431564226&bclid=1390821699&bctid=1389988076 JOHNupsidedown ( talk) 09:13, 24 September 2008 (UTC) Need help at Shannara....Multiple vandals....who all happen to be my friends too. UGH. (Try not to block me too, but if you do, oh well. the_ed 17 18:30, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm not quite old enough to completely understand...But my mom always says stuff like that about him, too, so I kinda understand.... But (on a different note) is it alright if I stole your style-thing (I'm not sure what to call it) for my talk page etc.? I'm going to change the color eventually, but...if it isn't, I'll just revert it. the_ed 17 15:50, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
I really think the people on here should lighten up. Stating a Haggis is a Ginger and hairy with 2 legs longer than other, they are often seen running around hills. Very shy fury animals, which when skinned make traditional Scottish cuisine, was mearly fun. Crikey what sad people you must be to be offended —Preceding unsigned comment added by Samismarried ( talk • contribs) 22:01, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
hey i'm really suprised by this. we do a tv show online that makes absolutely zero money. we do it for educational purposes only for the benefit of doctors and patients out there. we dont sell anything. i added a video of a show we did with the most respected man in the vitamin industry talking about the importance of quality control in the vitamimn industry. its just like a jazzy seminar. if i am going about doing it the wrong way i would appreciate input on how to do it right. i created a new section titled "educational video" and put the episode there. we pay for our own bandwidth, we dont have tile adds, we are just trying to help educate the world... —Preceding unsigned comment added by NPTV ( talk • contribs) 22:28, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for blocking him!!! ...but I also owe you a "thanks" for clearing the autoblock. =D the_ed 17 15:12, 17 April 2008 (UTC) I appreciate you more than you can ever know! Thanks for the comment. I sure hope we can get some of the Anon editors to talk about their concerns. I tried to speculate on what I think is the matter, but trying to re-edit without talking doesn't seem to work. John Park ( talk) 18:33, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Dear Fisherqueen, I kindly ask you to unblock my account as I have sorted out the matter that made it look like a communal account. I had let some people air their views through my account unaware of the fact that it is against Wikipedia policy. I apologize and appeal to you to kindly reinstate the account. This mistake will not be repeated. Thankyou, User:bmjmureithi.( 70.11.104.32 ( talk) 21:33, 17 April 2008 (UTC))
Hi FQ, Trolling wiki in boredom, I come upon this. Remember Mr. Barefoot from months back, User:Creepy Crawler? Is it worth adding all the socks there now, or should I/we wait until they're back at it? WLU ( talk) 18:43, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
sources??? Aren't you supposed to "assume good faith"??? Jayneofthejungle ( talk) 21:29, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Just because I quoted WR doesn't mean that I post there. I mean, you obviously read it too, don't you? Are you embarrassed about that? Probably not, because it's the "in"-place to be. Since Post-postmodernist thought is oldhat, it's only a matter of time before Post-post-postmodernism takes over. Why don't we just get it over with and start the article already?? Jayneofthejungle ( talk) 21:49, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
I personally think that if they change the license, they will have to either get Awbrey's permission or delete the contributions from all articles. Wikipedia does not control any copyrights by definition.
All edits are made on specific terms; You cannot simply arbitrarily change those terms. And the license does not give Wikipedia the rights to use Jon Awbrey's name as they choose. In any case, other people are beginning to understand the implication of all of this and hopefully, you will all have learned something because of this. good night Jayneofthejungle ( talk) 23:41, 20 April 2008 (UTC) Churches of Christ articleThere's a new user at the article ( Mark0880) putting in a lot of information that all seems to be unreferenced. I've talked to him on several occasions and he seems to have his heart in the right place, but he keeps inserting information that seems much more appropriate for a sermon or tract than an encyclopedia [5] [6]. Since you have experience with this article, I thought I'd come to you first and see if you could suggest a tact to take with him. I was just vandal fighting and drawn to the artile, I'm not really familiar with using references such as the Bible on articles dealing with religious matters. Thanks! Redrocket ( talk) 02:51, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
![]()
I swear this is why we need a CSD tag for hoaxes/joke articles. "Aerobic Beading with Richard Simmons"? "Snow White and the Seven Beads"? This reads more like a bored kid in school made this up. Wildthing61476 ( talk) 15:46, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Hiya FQ, hoping the weather finds you sunny and your bank balance finds you rich. I've a question for you - if you would be so kind, have a gander at the history of Richard Ofshe, particularly the contributions of 89.159.146.254 ( talk · contribs). You can see in my AIV report why I've been reverting - a source of "personal knowledge - Richard Ofshe" raises obvious WP:RS and WP:COI issues. Steve Crossin declined to block and fair enough given his rational, but hasn't responded to my question on his talk page. I'm perfectly willing to allow that this may not be an AIV matter, what I'd really like though is an option for a case like this, when after numerous postings on their talk page, there's been no reply and ongoing edits to the Ofshe page. I'm aware of WP:PARENT - I'm looking for advice, not a block, and am keenly aware of my shortcomings in comprehension of many policies and guidelines. As always, the distilled wisdom of your many moons as an admin is the only beverage that will slake my thirst. I should write hallmark cards for wikipedians. WLU ( talk) 15:10, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
He falsely calls me a vandal as I restoring the previous compact version and his behavior is highly uncivil and suits personal attack. I don't think the vulgarism should be included in the article, so I will raise RFC to resolve this absurd dispute. -- Appletrees ( talk) 15:31, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
You side him which is not clearly a compromised version with me or other anon at all. You not only reverted to include the vulgarism, but also well organized alignment. You're also involved in voicing your opinion on this, so you're not a meditator. I request you to revert it to the previous version before Sennen goroshi vandalise. (Why didn't you give a warning to him? That is also the fact that you're not neutral.)-- Appletrees ( talk) 16:13, 23 April 2008 (UTC) we talked the other day. I will make it brief. see her myspace http://www.myspace.com/JuliannaRoseMauriello I do not understand. How a few admins can claim anything different. the problem is is to alot of people she is a "loli". Many people will not even admit they are attracted to her. But its strange out of ALL the editors to her page over the last 2 years, MOST are the same exact people. interesting? They ignore her myspace and her imdb.com to satisfy themselves? This will never end, even if she would do an interview these people on wikipedia would STILL claim she was straight because it ruins their fantasy. I WORKED with her for FOUR DAYS straight. I MET her wife, I KNOW for a FACT. I believe that most if not all of the editors on wikipedia ALSO KNOW for a fact she is gay. They just dont want to admit it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.0.175.94 ( talk) 11:23, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
LOL are you SERIOUS??? Here, let me hand you these glasses once... Read her comments, look at the page. oh btw: http://youtube.com/jburwasser —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.0.175.94 ( talk) 11:41, 24 April 2008 (UTC) (sighs) as usual... why waste my time, you all know it all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.0.175.94 ( talk) 11:39, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
"Because gay couples cannot marry in New York, and because the marriage age in Canada is 18, any claim that she is married is so profoundly improbable that it would have to be verified by several very good sources. " Um, New York is not in Canada. And many couples are "married" in new york where the actual legal age to be married is 14 with parental consent. Just so you know some facts here... it was legal for gay people to marry in New York for a period of 7 months in 2007. Suggest studying up some. Doesn't matter though believe what you will —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.0.175.94 ( talk) 11:56, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
I did not understand why you removed what I saw as a legit article. help me to understand why you would remove a article that meets a NPOV? I comply with wiki rules, sorry I did not see the messages and understand, I really thought a troll kept removing the page, sorry. Cathy cathytreks ( talk) 17:44, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
cathytreks ( talk) 17:52, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Just saying howdy and a thanks for your continued reverts of nonsense vandalism and other services to humanity. I see you also are a fan of "I Can Haz Cheezburger" or other lolcats sites. My kind of person! LOL! Montanabw (talk) 03:59, 26 April 2008 (UTC) Don't threaten me. Unblock my LaruaWA11 account now, I will make as many accounts as it takes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vilecremence ( talk • contribs) 12:02, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
My article, ( phone song) is improved. Tell me if it's alright... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ehccheehcche ( talk • contribs) 22:10, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Ektron CMS400.NET is has no information linked to it from List_of_content_management_systems. Please allow at least a brief decription. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grimmjaw08 ( talk • contribs) 17:22, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
I am still very new at this. It will take me a few days to digest the info. I know I have a conflict of interest, but since the company is noted by outside industry publications on a regular basis, I do not think I will have any trouble citing the neccessary resources. Thanks again. I tried my best as a non-admin. But can you step in here. Two users in a dispute and both being rather uncivil. I am starting to lose my cool on this one..may have. So please can you step in and take charge here. I already suggested Tea and Biscuits and made it clear that both were at fault and should just seek mediation. Thought it was resolved but it appears the user did have diffs. I looked at all 12 of them. 11 seems semi-fine as it was a dumb vandal. But as I stated it was harsh to point it out. Rgoodermote 23:25, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
|