From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article Selection

Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

Article title

Nauwalabila 1

Article Evaluation

There is currently not a Wikipedia article on the site of Nauwabila 1, so I would have to draft this content out from scratch.

Sources

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277379101000580?casa_token=RK6iiAetxLgAAAAA:EdoJSzOLnp_5-WCec2ec-TvzQLpppm3xswII70RGDHXzrXJtaHNlT3sIavfy4pjX0k7MpSWpjQ

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440303001882?casa_token=NOg0630EdEcAAAAA:tG33TffektDDpzJLGCbXv00AyXrWWoPRHJfGFYiCZ2WJGwkXrJ8oGgXpeTBZc2970ORKj7RxiQ

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440312003664?casa_token=adT3kDAqn7IAAAAA:JhjnkoP3QjXcgg_eJdCujqNi0A29dsEIuRmlMw4Bkpikq8n-UQXGFFq3TjuvqTLy7_ZAAx8sew

Option 2

Article title

Thermoluminescence dating

Article Evaluation

This article is currently rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. I noticed that this article contains lots of jargon that the general public wouldn't really understand. The most recent entry on the Talk page also recommends for some editing and simplifying in order to make it comprehendible for readers.

Sources

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/027737918290018X

https://www.nature.com/articles/345153a0

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0735245X85900031

Option 3

Article title

Sahul

Article Evaluation

This article is currently rated Stub-class on the content assessment scale. The article itself is too short to have any sections, but the information that's currently there is concise. I would probably focus on adding some more details to the information that's already there.

Sources

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277379118310023

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/James-Oconnell-5/publication/251888687_Pleistocene_Sahul_and_the_origins_of_seafaring/links/53fbb2170cf2364ccc042576/Pleistocene-Sahul-and-the-origins-of-seafaring.pdf

https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/33708/459300.pdf?sequence=1#page=43

Option 4

Article title

Sahul Shelf

Article Evaluation

This article is currently rated as Start-class. The article itself is fairly short, but has a few sections. I think more information about early human migrations should be included, in the context of our class. Each section could use more details as a whole.

Sources

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00489.x

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1055790320302761

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1367912099000747

Option 5

Article title

Wallacea

Article Evaluation

This article is currently rated as Start-class. This article is comprised of a few sections, with plenty of links to other Wikipedia articles, but I think that there needs to be more reliable references.

Sources

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/brv.12683

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2893/f21c0454b461fbef83db38599e87f2f13489.pdf

https://academic.oup.com/biolinnean/article/101/1/193/2450527

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article Selection

Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

Article title

Nauwalabila 1

Article Evaluation

There is currently not a Wikipedia article on the site of Nauwabila 1, so I would have to draft this content out from scratch.

Sources

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277379101000580?casa_token=RK6iiAetxLgAAAAA:EdoJSzOLnp_5-WCec2ec-TvzQLpppm3xswII70RGDHXzrXJtaHNlT3sIavfy4pjX0k7MpSWpjQ

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440303001882?casa_token=NOg0630EdEcAAAAA:tG33TffektDDpzJLGCbXv00AyXrWWoPRHJfGFYiCZ2WJGwkXrJ8oGgXpeTBZc2970ORKj7RxiQ

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440312003664?casa_token=adT3kDAqn7IAAAAA:JhjnkoP3QjXcgg_eJdCujqNi0A29dsEIuRmlMw4Bkpikq8n-UQXGFFq3TjuvqTLy7_ZAAx8sew

Option 2

Article title

Thermoluminescence dating

Article Evaluation

This article is currently rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. I noticed that this article contains lots of jargon that the general public wouldn't really understand. The most recent entry on the Talk page also recommends for some editing and simplifying in order to make it comprehendible for readers.

Sources

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/027737918290018X

https://www.nature.com/articles/345153a0

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0735245X85900031

Option 3

Article title

Sahul

Article Evaluation

This article is currently rated Stub-class on the content assessment scale. The article itself is too short to have any sections, but the information that's currently there is concise. I would probably focus on adding some more details to the information that's already there.

Sources

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277379118310023

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/James-Oconnell-5/publication/251888687_Pleistocene_Sahul_and_the_origins_of_seafaring/links/53fbb2170cf2364ccc042576/Pleistocene-Sahul-and-the-origins-of-seafaring.pdf

https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/33708/459300.pdf?sequence=1#page=43

Option 4

Article title

Sahul Shelf

Article Evaluation

This article is currently rated as Start-class. The article itself is fairly short, but has a few sections. I think more information about early human migrations should be included, in the context of our class. Each section could use more details as a whole.

Sources

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00489.x

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1055790320302761

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1367912099000747

Option 5

Article title

Wallacea

Article Evaluation

This article is currently rated as Start-class. This article is comprised of a few sections, with plenty of links to other Wikipedia articles, but I think that there needs to be more reliable references.

Sources

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/brv.12683

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2893/f21c0454b461fbef83db38599e87f2f13489.pdf

https://academic.oup.com/biolinnean/article/101/1/193/2450527


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook