![]() | These guides represent the thoughts of their authors. All individually written voter guides are eligible for inclusion. |
This year's
results have been posted. Congratulations and sympathies to the new arbs!
Disclaimer: This page expresses my personal opinions and observations only. I encourage all voters to do their own research on the candidates.
For those who aren't sure what this is about: The Arbitration Committee is part of the Wikipedia dispute resolution process. In fact, ArbCom is pretty much the last stop. For a general real world analogy, ArbCom is sort of like the Supreme Court of Wikipedia. The arbitrators don't make decisions on article content, but they do issue rulings on complex disputes relating to user conduct, and they have considerable authority within the wiki-culture. Members of the Committee are usually elected for two-year terms (sometimes one or three), with a new batch elected each year.
In September 2018, an RfC took place concerning the format of the 2018 elections, at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Arbitration Committee Elections December 2018.
Candidates self-nominated from November 4 to November 13, and the voting period will run from November 19 to December 2. For details on voting eligibility, see the 2018 election page.
For this 2018/2019 cycle, the size of the Committee is being reduced from 15 to 13. There will be 6 vacancies to be filled, for either one- or two-year terms.
This page that you are reading, contains my (Elonka's) thoughts on the current crop of ArbCom candidates. My general standards for a candidate are:
I am also a strong supporter of civility, as I believe that rude behavior on the project can drive away other editors, and I would hope that ArbCom would help support that view; however, I also understand that not everyone has the same feelings about civility, so I am willing to support arbitrator candidates for other reasons than just that one.
To see my thoughts on previous elections, check the history of:
![]() | These guides represent the thoughts of their authors. All individually written voter guides are eligible for inclusion. |
![]() | These guides represent the thoughts of their authors. All individually written voter guides are eligible for inclusion. |
This year's
results have been posted. Congratulations and sympathies to the new arbs!
Disclaimer: This page expresses my personal opinions and observations only. I encourage all voters to do their own research on the candidates.
For those who aren't sure what this is about: The Arbitration Committee is part of the Wikipedia dispute resolution process. In fact, ArbCom is pretty much the last stop. For a general real world analogy, ArbCom is sort of like the Supreme Court of Wikipedia. The arbitrators don't make decisions on article content, but they do issue rulings on complex disputes relating to user conduct, and they have considerable authority within the wiki-culture. Members of the Committee are usually elected for two-year terms (sometimes one or three), with a new batch elected each year.
In September 2018, an RfC took place concerning the format of the 2018 elections, at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Arbitration Committee Elections December 2018.
Candidates self-nominated from November 4 to November 13, and the voting period will run from November 19 to December 2. For details on voting eligibility, see the 2018 election page.
For this 2018/2019 cycle, the size of the Committee is being reduced from 15 to 13. There will be 6 vacancies to be filled, for either one- or two-year terms.
This page that you are reading, contains my (Elonka's) thoughts on the current crop of ArbCom candidates. My general standards for a candidate are:
I am also a strong supporter of civility, as I believe that rude behavior on the project can drive away other editors, and I would hope that ArbCom would help support that view; however, I also understand that not everyone has the same feelings about civility, so I am willing to support arbitrator candidates for other reasons than just that one.
To see my thoughts on previous elections, check the history of:
![]() | These guides represent the thoughts of their authors. All individually written voter guides are eligible for inclusion. |