A very similar dispute has failed recently. Not exactly a content dispute, more of several instances of disruptive editing.
JQTriple7 (
talk) 05:11, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Closed discussion
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the
dispute resolution noticeboard's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Filed by
Id4abel on 04:18, 25 November 2015 (UTC).
Have you discussed this on a talk page?
Yes, I have discussed this issue on a talk page already.
Unregistered user seem to think that only plagiarism is valid text in a Wikipedia article:
"In 'History' it says FEE is the oldest free market org." 107.107.61.73 (talk) 00:34, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
"The Clash of Economic Ideas by Lawrence H. White
'The oldest free-market American think tank is the foundation for Economic Education, founded in 1946, which as noted was ...'
The Making of Modern Economics by Mark Skousen
'In his eighties, he continued to lecture at the Foundation for Economic Education in IrvingtononHudson, New York (the oldest free market think tank, founded in 1946 by Leonard Read), and ...'" Abel (talk) 01:58, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
"These refs do not say 'oldest org' just thinktank ..." 107.107.61.57 (talk) 03:12, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Please keep discussion to a minimum before being opened by a volunteer. Continue on article talk page if necessary.
Volunteer note: Declined The last case on this subject did not go well, as the IP user mentioned failed to respond to reasonable questions. This all seems a little far fetched. I'm not taking another case on this subject. I suggest instead that disruptive editing by anonymous users may be dealt with at
WP:ANEW or
WP:ANI, or the simplest method is just to request page semi-protection. Thanks,
JQTriple7 (
talk) 05:10, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the
dispute resolution noticeboard's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
A very similar dispute has failed recently. Not exactly a content dispute, more of several instances of disruptive editing.
JQTriple7 (
talk) 05:11, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Closed discussion
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the
dispute resolution noticeboard's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Filed by
Id4abel on 04:18, 25 November 2015 (UTC).
Have you discussed this on a talk page?
Yes, I have discussed this issue on a talk page already.
Unregistered user seem to think that only plagiarism is valid text in a Wikipedia article:
"In 'History' it says FEE is the oldest free market org." 107.107.61.73 (talk) 00:34, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
"The Clash of Economic Ideas by Lawrence H. White
'The oldest free-market American think tank is the foundation for Economic Education, founded in 1946, which as noted was ...'
The Making of Modern Economics by Mark Skousen
'In his eighties, he continued to lecture at the Foundation for Economic Education in IrvingtononHudson, New York (the oldest free market think tank, founded in 1946 by Leonard Read), and ...'" Abel (talk) 01:58, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
"These refs do not say 'oldest org' just thinktank ..." 107.107.61.57 (talk) 03:12, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Please keep discussion to a minimum before being opened by a volunteer. Continue on article talk page if necessary.
Volunteer note: Declined The last case on this subject did not go well, as the IP user mentioned failed to respond to reasonable questions. This all seems a little far fetched. I'm not taking another case on this subject. I suggest instead that disruptive editing by anonymous users may be dealt with at
WP:ANEW or
WP:ANI, or the simplest method is just to request page semi-protection. Thanks,
JQTriple7 (
talk) 05:10, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the
dispute resolution noticeboard's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.