• My Sandbox
• About Good Faith

My Userbox en-us-n This user is a native speaker of American English. This user spent 2 years in Purgatory. This user is a former 2 percenter of Texas A&M University. Gig 'Em, Aggies! This user comes from the United States of America. This user hates all haters. Don't hate or I'll hate you! This user wastes far too much time editing Wikipedia. This user tries his best to abide by the NPOV policy. This user believes that meat is tasty and is a Carnivegan. This user is a Hospitalist, trained in Internal medicine and a D.O. . Ironically, this user is a skeptic and thinks all of Medicine should be evidence-based.

Picture of the day

Bispira volutacornis, sometimes known as the twin fan worm or spiral fan worm, is a type of tube worm found in the shallow sublittoral zone of the eastern Atlantic Ocean. It grows in crevices and in stony areas and prefers areas rich in sediment but with low levels of illumination. It has a parchment-like tube with a mucoid outer layer that is often coated with mud or silt. The tube is usually concealed in a crevice and the worm can retract into the tube when disturbed. It feeds on plankton which it captures with its plumes. It also uses the plumes to gather sediment with which to expand the tube. This B. volutavornis worm was photographed in Arrábida Natural Park, Portugal.Photograph credit: Diego Delso

Archive – More featured pictures...

In cases where prevailing opinion lies in one direction, people with minority viewpoints inevitably have the burden of proof thrust upon them.

Economic Left/Right: -1.63

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.87

Heh, 10 years later

Economic Left/Right: -4.12

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.56

And 5 years later

Economic Left/Right: -4.88

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.54

Politicalcompass.org

Raul's Laws of Wikipedia

Not just about ensuring SPOV, NPOV or reverting vandalism, but citing & verifying to defend against trivial, but highly vocal, minority viewpoints who often eloquently argue & post large number of references, most of which are selectively misquoted, do not draw the claimed conclusions or are anecdotal reports rather than null-hypothesis statistically-vetted duplicable-research.