Hi, welcome to Wikipedia.

I see that you are the original contributor of the above article. Can I suggest that you read Wikipedia's notability guidelines for books ( Wikipedia:Notability (books)), and likewise, our general guidelines on writing in an encyclopaedic style (If you are new to Wikipedia editing, I suggest you start at Wikipedia:Your first article). The article on the book is almost certain to be deleted as not meeting our notability requirements, and if it did, would need a complete rewrite in neutral, encyclopaedic terms, together with references from third-party [[WP:RS|reliable sources): Wikipedia is not a provider of free advertising space for self-published works, and nor is it an appropriate place for unsubstantiated puffery like "an eye-opening and mind altering perspective and suggest out-of-the-box solutions...".

I see that you are also responsible for the Danish Rahi biography, which has much the same problems, and is likewise liable to be deleted unless appropriate independent evidence of notability can be provided.

Finally, I have to ask the obvious question, are you in any way related to, or involved with, Danish Rahi himself? If so, you need to read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, as it is most inadvisable to write articles regarding subjects with which you have a close inviolvement. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 14:39, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

I have looked into this further, and it seems evident that the book does not meet our requirements regarding notability. I have therefore proposed that the article be deleted - see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pakish Identity. Any response would best be made there. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 20:24, 20 September 2011 (UTC)