Senior editor on Wikipedia since Jan 15, 2001
Hello there Please stop changing the photo montage without consensus. See WP:BRD. Please discuss on Talk page. Also please note that you are replacing a photo of the opera house with another photo which is almost identical to a photo already in the montage.
Thank you Aemilius Adolphin ( talk) 22:27, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Sydney shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — C.Fred ( talk) 02:51, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
noted.. I'm merely trying to improve the page and for some reason Aemillus seems to have an "agenda" to keep a fake purple photoshopped image that does not represent Sydney in any way, it's "fake art" and doesn't look anything like what the real "view" of Sydney or Sydney harbour is.. I'm merely trying to improve the page for the city I actually live in with a real image / photo I took and donated for free to wikipedia's image library, this one:
I've added this note in the talk page now.. Dez blanchfield ( talk) 03:07, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Senior editor on Wikipedia since Jan 15, 2001
Hello there Please stop changing the photo montage without consensus. See WP:BRD. Please discuss on Talk page. Also please note that you are replacing a photo of the opera house with another photo which is almost identical to a photo already in the montage.
Thank you Aemilius Adolphin ( talk) 22:27, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Sydney shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — C.Fred ( talk) 02:51, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
noted.. I'm merely trying to improve the page and for some reason Aemillus seems to have an "agenda" to keep a fake purple photoshopped image that does not represent Sydney in any way, it's "fake art" and doesn't look anything like what the real "view" of Sydney or Sydney harbour is.. I'm merely trying to improve the page for the city I actually live in with a real image / photo I took and donated for free to wikipedia's image library, this one:
I've added this note in the talk page now.. Dez blanchfield ( talk) 03:07, 6 April 2024 (UTC)