From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
User page Let's talk! My sandboxes

This is not a sandbox. I deliberately create it with some objective, i.e., a list of the sandboxes, which I will probably utilize for testing, and practicing writing (or expanding) an article.

List

Aftermath

  • Gyroelongated square bipyramid — done implementing, but needs to find more about its applications, if possible, before nominating to GA.
  • Pentagonal bipyramid — missing sources for its dual, and the right and oblique of pentagonal bipyramids. Should the structure refactored in the same way as Square pyramid if there are cases of right and equilateral?
  • Rhombicuboctahedron — sources problems
  • Regular icosahedron — more sourcing and more expansion of the article.
  • Triangular bipyramid — done implementing. Before nominating to GA, perhaps check the verifiability of sources, and perhaps find more sources on surface area and volume of the non-regular one (should we?). Aside from that, I'm very skeptical about the section "graph"; should this be removed and merged into the properties section? Should the structure refactored in the same way as Square pyramid?
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
User page Let's talk! My sandboxes

This is not a sandbox. I deliberately create it with some objective, i.e., a list of the sandboxes, which I will probably utilize for testing, and practicing writing (or expanding) an article.

List

Aftermath

  • Gyroelongated square bipyramid — done implementing, but needs to find more about its applications, if possible, before nominating to GA.
  • Pentagonal bipyramid — missing sources for its dual, and the right and oblique of pentagonal bipyramids. Should the structure refactored in the same way as Square pyramid if there are cases of right and equilateral?
  • Rhombicuboctahedron — sources problems
  • Regular icosahedron — more sourcing and more expansion of the article.
  • Triangular bipyramid — done implementing. Before nominating to GA, perhaps check the verifiability of sources, and perhaps find more sources on surface area and volume of the non-regular one (should we?). Aside from that, I'm very skeptical about the section "graph"; should this be removed and merged into the properties section? Should the structure refactored in the same way as Square pyramid?

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook