CheckUser evidence confirms that the owner of this account has abusively used multiple accounts. (Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets · sockpuppet investigations casepage · Checkuser request)

"I am not here to disrupt edits and be a COI editor but I am here to stop POV (negative) edits on certain subjects. Everything must be neutral."

You can check my number of edits here.

Dar book/Dar book3 This user maintains a strict policy advising against all personal attacks. This user is proud to be a Filipino. This user still uses these. This user enjoys writing. This user is a Naturalist. This user thinks that Wikipedia has become too bureaucratic. This user feels that deletions subject to a popularity contest rather than a verifiability test damage Wikipedia more than any userbox ever could. This user eats chicken. Earth This user is an Earthbender. This user has a neutral religion and cannot join and Christian Organization 'cauze he's only 14 years old. Deletion is not evil and try to make it stay that way. This user recycles This user contributes using Firefox Science stuff This user has a keen interest in learning about Chemistry. This user loves calculators. This user uses a TI calculator. This user is interested in the natural sciences. This user has a keen interest in physics. This user contributes with a computer manufactured by Dell. This user contributes using Microsoft Windows XP. This user contributes using Microsoft Windows 2000. This user is a member of the WikiProject Television Avatar: The Last Airbender task force. no ads This user is against commercials in Wikipedia. 120px|left|thumb|Dar book is proud to be a MariSci student.

I think you may have confused the words "fond" and "fund". "fond of criticising" means "likes to criticise". "funds criticism" means "pays money for criticising". "Fond" has nothing to do with money. Despite this, I am not going to put "fond" back in because it is unnecessary and your wording is simpler, more neutral and less likely to be misunderstood. By DanielRigal