Hi DaneGeld! You created a thread called Archival by
Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by
Muninnbot, both
automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kinderling Kids Radio, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Alexa and Amazon ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:41, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
Just letting you know that you're missing a few steps with the Sambo (racial term) merge you've just proposed. A few things: the template goes on the article page (not the talk page), you should put a template on both articles (so, your missing the merge from), you've suggested a merge to a page that doesn't exist (its a redirect), you haven't dated the proposal (and the dating bots don't check the talk pages), and you haven't started a discussion. For a guide to merging, see WP:MERGEPROP. Klbrain ( talk) 19:54, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi there. I'm letting you know that I removed the GA nomination you placed on
Mother Angelica for a couple of reasons. First, although anyone may nominate an article for GA status, it is generally recommended that the nominator be someone who has actively worked on the article. Second and more importantly, one of the automatic failures for GA nominations is if the article has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid.
Last month, there was a cleanup banner (a fairly important one, saying that a section on calls for canonization has no references) placed on one section. Please do not be discouraged; if anything, take it as a sign to start work on improving the article to get it to GA status. —
Ghost
River 18:30, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Our Lady Immaculate and St Etheldreda's Church, Newmarket, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Bruxton (
talk) 17:00, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi DaneGeld! You created a thread called Archival by
Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by
Muninnbot, both
automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kinderling Kids Radio, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Alexa and Amazon ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:41, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
Just letting you know that you're missing a few steps with the Sambo (racial term) merge you've just proposed. A few things: the template goes on the article page (not the talk page), you should put a template on both articles (so, your missing the merge from), you've suggested a merge to a page that doesn't exist (its a redirect), you haven't dated the proposal (and the dating bots don't check the talk pages), and you haven't started a discussion. For a guide to merging, see WP:MERGEPROP. Klbrain ( talk) 19:54, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi there. I'm letting you know that I removed the GA nomination you placed on
Mother Angelica for a couple of reasons. First, although anyone may nominate an article for GA status, it is generally recommended that the nominator be someone who has actively worked on the article. Second and more importantly, one of the automatic failures for GA nominations is if the article has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid.
Last month, there was a cleanup banner (a fairly important one, saying that a section on calls for canonization has no references) placed on one section. Please do not be discouraged; if anything, take it as a sign to start work on improving the article to get it to GA status. —
Ghost
River 18:30, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Our Lady Immaculate and St Etheldreda's Church, Newmarket, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Bruxton (
talk) 17:00, 18 September 2022 (UTC)