I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Literaturegeek |
T@1k?
06:31, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article
Paroxetine has an
edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did and why. Thank you. Regarding
this reversion, please do not characterize good-faith editing as
WP:Vandalism. Remember that one of Wikipedia's core guidelines is
Wikipedia:Assume good faith.
--Dynaflow
babble
11:34, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Hey DK. I appreciate your good faith discussion. I actually did add a source if you look at the history. There are of course lots more. Cheers. ChildofMidnight ( talk) 05:22, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
|
This is all relative.
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Care to explain those removals? You even claimed the MD link didn't mention MD - very ironic. I didn't see much wrong with those sections, not at least meriting a total removal. If you don't integrate some of the texts back into the article, I'll figure a way to make them legitimate, but like I said, total removal of those sections is very much uncalled for. Otvaltak ( talk) 22:34, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
|
Excuse us here at the UWEC, but in actual truths, we actually were not really testing-we were partly redesigning certain portions of French fries, and we'd never purposely vandalize any articles. Sorry of the mistake-please give us any insights or view you have on the article portion we edited. We represent University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire-in the reality, testings aren't what we are here doing. Please help us out so that the testing notes will not pop onto our college usertalk pages again. We're sorry for inconvenience caused by that editing we did with "French fries." What was the problem?
The UWEC at 173.19.119.172 ( talk) 04:08, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Yes, I am a very awkward, I am very straight forward and random. And no, I do not see it as conflict of Interests. I love my neighbor and my enemy, but I do not follow their steps nor their beliefs. I DO NOT DISCRIMINATE, I am not a hypocrite. I am a Republican, and believe in Republican and Christian values. The band t.A.T.u. is my favorite band, i love their music not their actions. I have proof that Barack Obama is a Muslim, but I can not express myself. I believe my Freedom of Speech and Right are violated. I edited United States of America showing that it was formed under Christian founders, but they deleted my sentences and say I just committed vandalism. I believe Wikipedia is not being fair to me, i can not edit or show my point of view, only the others. JonasanRat7 ( talk)JonasanRat7 —Preceding undated comment added 04:23, 12 June 2009 (UTC).
(EC-OD)To everyone involved, this conversation doesn't really appear to be going anywhere, and certainly doesn't appear to be geared towards helping to create an encyclopedia. I'll politely suggest that this conversation just stop before we get too deep into insults and personal attacks. I see Swimmerfreak has retracted one of his comments, good for him. Good luck in the future to everyone involved. Dayewalker ( talk) 05:25, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is JonasanRat7. Thank you.— Dæ dαlus Contribs 06:22, 12 June 2009 (UTC) |
Thanks for weighing in on the Dr90s issue at AN/I. It's depressing going back through the history of this Dr90s character. I only became involved in the matter 6 months ago but his history as far as I can trace it goes back to at least May 2008. In looking back like this, I see a lot of trouble from this guy and in some cases it appears he has contributed to the retirement of valuable and productive editors like User:The Prince of Darkness. As this retired editor's "farewell message" says, "I developed stress and often became very angry or depressed by having edit wars and pointless discussions with other editors. I'm also very tired of having to revert vandalism done by IP addresses (if only registration was required...). So what I really need to do is leave, because I don't think Wikipedia is good for my health." Judging by earlier unsuccessful Dr90s reports like this, it appears clear that Dr90s' tendentious editing style has done serious damage to Wikipedia. I have lost the optimism I once had on the issue, and I honestly don't think we'll ever be free of this obsessed guy. My goal now is to build up tools that normal editors can use to rid us of his corrupting influence. The AN/I sanction is an important step since it makes Sockpuppet reports easier to file. I appreciate your support in the matter greatly. Cheers, - Thibbs ( talk) 13:58, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
In this edit, [1] you added a See also reference to a non existing page. There's a Wikipedia note about doing so at WP:ALSO; it's recommended not to link to uncreated pages in See also sections. Thanks, and good editing! Newportm ( talk) 00:29, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
|
Please explain your edits in this artile and what do you consider 'unsourced'?-- MathFacts ( talk) 17:09, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Since July 1 you trying to stalk me down (although the truth
|
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
I see the IP repeatedly entering Season 7. If you keep changing it back yourself, I fear you could inadvertantly violate 3RR, and you do too much good work to be blocked. I'll try to keep my eye open and help our where I can - but I hope you perhaps will call in an admin to help you with this person who doesn't quite understand the rules. Alternately, you could let him list "Season 7 in production" as CBS has announced they renewed the show. I apologise if I have stuck my big Irish nose in where it doesn't belong. Look at my contribs and you will see I hate van.... um, uncited changes as much as you. But do not want to see an edit war with this person and you - it looks like he's hopping IP's anyway, so he will be harder to nail. I will help you if I can, but only if you want it. Cheers, TristaBella ( talk) 23:38, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
|
Please remember to
assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you. —
Please comment
R
2
15:52, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Hello!! I was accused of vandalism...?!? Why?! Lightwarrior2 ( talk) 02:41, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
|
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. =) Impala2009 | Talk 00:59, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Just curious as to why the notes I added re: the song "Thriller" were removed. The song was featured in the SoBe Life Water commercial and in the movie "Revenge of the Nerds." For verification, you can always look them up on You Tube, or rent the DVD (of the movie). I have no reason to make this up. 98.218.111.226 ( talk) 21:46, 10 July 2009 (UTC) V1iciouslady
Hi there,
Thanks for your edits to the article, but please take note of the three revert rule. If you revert another user's edits more than 3 times in 24 hours, you can be blocked from editing. I strongly suggest talking things over at the article talk page and reaching a consensus about the article content. Let me know if I can help. Papa November ( talk) 23:11, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
{{tracklist}}
template to the Collector's Edition in favor of a sloppy, bulleted, improperly-titled list of tracks, please chime in on either the user's or article's talk page. If I've done something wrong or against precedent, I'd be happy to leave this alone. But I can not see how most of what he reverted (which were not just edits I had made, but edits by others as well) was anything but improvements.Firstly, I made a mistake when I reverted the track templates. I was looking at the page diff comparision, so I only saw the extra tracklist section. Misremembering how the main tracklist section was formatted in this page, I mistakenly thought that the main and extra tracklist sections used inconsistent formatting, so I tried to recitfy that. I apologize. Secondly, the "who?" template is incorrectly used. The subject is stated (music critics), which is all we need; as this is the lead section of the article, specifying which critics hold this opinion would make the section unnecessarily long. Per WP:LEAD, we kept it simple; specifics are discussed in the article body. If you have a better way to convey the same information, feel free to edit the lead, but the template is unnecessary. As for English in the album infoboxes, that's one of Koavf's editing ticks. He keeps insisting on putting a language in the infobox even though neither the album infobox page nor WikiProject albums instruct people to do so (regardless, that hasn't stopped him from trying to cite both as indicating the field should be included, even though I've pointed out to him before that that is false). It's not something I go out of my way to remove; if I see it in a page I'm editing I remove it, because it isn't particularly useful, it's not part of the template script, he's the only one who inserts it, and other editors have done the same. WesleyDodds ( talk) 03:56, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Please clarify how my edit to Barack Obama's wikipedia page in any way violated any wikipedia TOS. My entry changed "was born at" to "is thought to have been born at" and also added "No official documentation of his exact birth location has ever been released or confirmed." How can this possibly be defamatory? Is it factually untrue? If you consider it unsourced, that's quite the point - there is no official confirmation, just news articles which only in the past week changed the birth hospital from Queen's Hospital to Kapi'olani, shortly after WND broke the story of the Obama letter. Amazingly, the change to Kapi'olani as the birth place was coincident with that hospital removing the Obama letter stating he was born there. There is not only no official or primary source verification that Kapi'olani is the birth place, there is active controversy and evidence of a cover up. To state as fact his birth location at this point is grossly irresponsible. If you can produce any official documentation of the birth location, please do. Otherwise, accept that there is a controversy. Your Orwellian tactics simply add to my concerns that wikipedia is a fundamentally biased site. Jwbaumann ( talk) 06:17, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Spoken like a true wikipedian. My point is made. Thank you. Jwbaumann ( talk) 17:25, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
In a case of life imitating art, I saw a story that some military officer is refusing to go back to Afghanistan on the grounds that Obama is not eligible to be President. He probably figures that's better than coming out and saying, "I don't wanna get shot!" Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 12:26, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello DKquerty, IP editor 66.67.100.83 has made a comment about an athlete who was reverted as being non-notable. As the editor who made the reversion, I thought perhaps you'd like to comment or follow the discussion. If not that's cool too. Thanks, -- JBC3 ( talk) 15:18, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
That guy was given a short block, a year ago, apparently for sockpuppetry. So why is he still here, I wonder? Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 12:23, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Looks like you've acquired an impersonator at DKqwenty ( talk · contribs). Any idea who it might be? Dayewalker ( talk) 13:17, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
It appears you have been in a conflict with 92.239.38.135 ( talk · contribs) about them removing comments from their talk page. I'm writing to make you aware that users (including anonymous IP editors) are allowed to remove warnings and comments from their talk pages. Doing so is considered acknowledgment of having read them. Restoring warnings and comments to other users' talk pages after they have removed them is considered disruption. There are important exceptions to this:
{{
unblock}}
requests before the block expires{{
sharedIPEDU}}
{{
sockpuppet}}
or confirmed {{
sockpuppeteer}}
tags from their talk pages.I hope this clears things up. Toddst1 ( talk) 15:36, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
See user:Calcentnavania2,100 -- Omarcheeseboro ( talk) 19:40, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
You tried to do a cut and past move of Those Damned Blue Collar Tweekers -> Those Damned Blue-Collar Tweekers, but moving pages this way doesn't move the page history. You should move pages using the "move" tab atop the article, or if it blocks you, put it on Requested moves for an administrator to do it. -- Austin512 ( talk • contribs) 03:24, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
OK, it just looked suspicious for someone to remove a category, but if it's not for DS, then it never really should have been there I suppose. Darktower 12345 ( talk) 02:52, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Johnny Depp has been confirmed to play the Mad Hatter in Tim Burton's Alice In Wonderland film. How can that cause vandalism? We're allowed to include random references to the character but we can't include an actor who's own page lists "Mad Hatter" as who he's playing in an upcoming film?-- 67.34.181.210 ( talk) 15:05, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
RE: Sumer Camp
I know I shouldnt of put it on, I knew that before you removed it, I belive I did remove it, But I must of thought I did, then againg, sory.
Your note:
Please do not use styles that are unusual or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in
Template:Obama Executive Office. There is a
Manual of Style that should be followed. Thank you. Specifically: title case should always be used, not all caps; the form "since XXXX" should be used rather than "XXXX—" per
WP:OTHERDATE; an en-dash ("–") or em-dash ("—") should always be used rather than a double hyphen ("--"); Please take a moment to read over the manual of style and use it as a guide for future editing. Thank you.
DKqwerty (
talk)
01:22, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
Response:
WP:OTHERDATE does NOT disallow dates with hyphens in tables. It discusses how to best use them. Please carefully read the provisions before calling out others for not following them.
WP:MOS applies to text; it says nothing about all caps captions in tables. That said, it does not matter to me either way, so I will use title case in my next edit of the templates.
You are correct about the double hyphen, and I will use the em-dash instead. Thank you.
I see that you have had that same issue with another person who was trying to edit the templates last month. To avoid a misunderstanding, perhaps I should explain why I am making the edits: it is to make the tables more readable. When the word "since" is removed, the spacing is much improved, the tables are half the length, and they can be viewed without excessive use of page downs. This is especially important in the Obama administration set of templates which have been stacked in multiple layers. Often the length of the templates exceeds the length of the biographical article on the Obama administration official.
Furthermore, as indicated in the MOS, "Printers and screen-readers will both output only the content that is immediately visible on the page". Therefore the tables with the "since" removed are more accessible and printable as well.
I trust that you will not revert these changes unless you can justify the unnecessary length, readablity and printability issues that your changes produce. --Regards W E Hill ( talk) 12:20, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
I noticed the work you have been doing on the Jaco Pastorius article- the photos of him young I posted.. I don't have as much time as I'd like but this is a very noteworthy musician, I feel, and deserving of time and care. Thanks so much! -- Leahtwosaints ( talk) 22:50, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Please
assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. If you continue to assume bad faith, you will be blocked from editing.
70.245.239.63 (
talk)
14:27, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
I warned the IP to the vandalism to your page, I'd suggest WP:SPI.-- SKATER Speak.
::Hmm...Should I request Checkuser for this one? I'm still debating it.--
SKATER
Speak.
19:53, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
[3] I'm not bad at math or anything, what I meant was that I was basically halfing the size of the image, having it as 200px size (which I tried in preview) made it too small. • GunMetal Angel 00:48, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Glad we could sort that out - would have been just as happy to discuss with you directly. Re: 'national park'; I actually got there looking for something different myself and decided the disambiguation wasn't clear enough (it wasn't one of my random edits). Understand if people disagree but but non-pluralised 'national park' is used extensively in an international context and most of my additions were in 'see also' anyway. The list is actually the direct result of the search of wikipedia for 'national park' so suggesting they are not what someone would go searching for is mistaken. Anyway, I won't bother amending it if there is a massive movement against national park disambiguation change but I thought I'd at least explain it. Happy hunting. Stalwart111 ( talk) 03:54, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
blah blah blah...the song remains the same |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
This is the second time a significant piece of information I have added to an article has deleted by some tyrant who apparently enforces som sort de facto ownership of it. I have no intention of ruining anything, I act on Wikipedia written request to improve Wikipedia. Wikipedia will have a bad future if your action is standard procedure in handling good faithed contributions. "Campus" has become what the article (now again) says, but is since America is only 200 years old, the term traditionally means what I have wrote. The article's very American definition contradicts the real meaning of the term, since university areas is far from open spaces and America is not equivalent with the world. I am sorry, but tradition did not start with the establishment of American universities. Tradition has traditionally a long tradition. The temp "campus" (and especially since the term "traditionally") is NOT equivilent with university araes and what do you care, apparantly you are a dane like me. You have no idea how provocative your destructive and arbitrary action is after the time efford one has invested in improving an article, and the sentence "good-faith edit by ...... this is an article on the subject, not a dictionary entry or study of etymology" does not justify your action. Actually it makes it worse since good faith has to be respected and in Wikipedia my opinion about terms origin should be stated is as good as yours. Many articles starts with a short explaination of a term's origin. If you respect good faith, not to mention solid facts, please undo your badly chosen action, and add something (instead of delete, (you do not own this article)), I do not want go into an "undo" war again and afterwards being blamed for mockering, which I have experienced once before - and lecture is that contribution is not worth the efford. Actually I don't know why I still bother. So PLEASE - I invite you to change the article so my additions is included in a way, that satisfy you. But since you are so wise, please instruct me how to wage an editorial war in which you so obviously have have drawn first blood so we both end up being banned - my previous experience is that in a Wikipedia sence, on can wage a war alone. have a nice day |
Hi! Noticed your edit. Had to correct it. Check the [Dual_Analog_Controller] article and you'll find that the first versions of the controller, released in Japan, had rumble. Sony took it out before the US release because they didn't think it was important enough to keep in. It's sourced and referenced as well. Cheers! 208.115.94.237 ( talk) 11:33, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. I think adding "during meiosis" is appropriately brief context for the lay reader when mentioning a relatively poorly understood subject like 'genetic recombination' in the Evolution article's lead section. I've left a note regarding this in an ongoing thread at Talk:Evolution#Reliance_on_wikilinking, and would like to know your thoughts. Cheers, Emw ( talk) 22:08, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
What kind of photos did you have in mind for navel? Have you found any examples on the internet, even if it's not free copyright, just so I can get the idea of what you are searching for? Nocturnal Wanderer 22:33, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for removing those edits from the Sandbox, clearly the person doesn't care much for privacy. Either way I've requested Suppression of the diffs. Jeffrey Mall ( talk • contribs) - 02:40, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
You put the hat fold on a section of discussion on the Barack Obama article that really doesn't make a whit of sense. There is a thread about whether to include a specific clause in the article (one that moreover has been in there), about how "early in the initiative that won the Novel prize" this one was. As these things do, I confess some editors veered slightly into ranting territory. But the basic point of including or not including a clause in the article is rather centrally related to article quality. It's wholly inappropriate to hide away a topic that is directly related to a current editing issue about which good faith editors reasonably differ in opinion! LotLE× talk 19:47, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Im telling you this because i think its gone on to long. You have failed to realize that Rochester's population is not 199,000 but 206,000 as you reverted an editor who fixed my vandalism. You also have failed to notice the census tables false information which includes a 2011 estimate! 67.240.191.249 ( talk) 00:24, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Sometime in late August or early September AHAF's Macular Degeneration Research link was added along with the MD Support link on the macular degeneration wiki article. I had nothing to do with those additions. Yesterday, you personally removed the link. I noticed that you removed it, so I added it back. Yes, I am employed with this Foundation as the Website Content Specialist/Production Assistant and I haven't tried to hide or deny that fact. Also, I'm brand new to Wikipedia and quite busy with many other responsibilities. Therefore, I did not notice that a WP:COI regulation existed.
The American Health Assistance Foundation (AHAF) is a registered 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that meets BBB charity standards http://charityreports.bbb.org/public/seal.aspx?ID=3305112007 and meets the standards of HONcode https://www.hon.ch/HONcode/Conduct.html?HONConduct619602.
I have found many examples where non-profits similar to AHAF are included in the external link section of the diseases they provide information about. This leads me to believe that a link to AHAF's Macular Degeneration Research would be encouraged.
I strongly feel that the (Macular Degeneration Research) external link is informative, up to date and provides services which other macular degeneration related websites do not. AHAF's website is clearly not spam. If you take the time to look beyond our program landing page and into the heart of our website, you will find detailed information regarding the research that we are currently funding and have funded in the past, you will also find information such as risk factors, screening and diagnosis, treatment options, adjusting to the home for those with low vision, an updated questions and answers section etc...
Here I will cite the reason per Wikipedia that our link should be included as an external link for this article.
WP:ELYES Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to copyright issues, amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks) or other reasons.
So, let's have an honest, open discussion. If I'm misinterpreting Wikipedia’s stance regarding external links, I'd appreciate if you would take the time to explain to me in a respectful manner how and why? Also, I'd appreciate if you would not cite WP:COI because I only recently became involved in this situation and you have removed this link in the past prior to my involvement.
Sdisandro ( talk) 14:56, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Please visit the discussion page for the Foreign policy of the Barack Obama administration article or my talk page to discuss your reasons why you reverted Venomviper edits to the article. Edward Lalone | ( Talk)
Hi - I noticed you have contributed recently to one or more of the decade articles ( 1990s, 1960s etc). I am proposing some major changes to these articles, as I have outlined in Talk:1990s/Archives/2012#Suggested_reform_of_decade_articles, and I would be interested in hearing your views in the first instance. Thanks. Kransky ( talk) 08:43, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
This went nowhere |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
The admin Horologium has picked up on your absurd edit to the Virginia Foxx article and determined it was POV. Hopefully someday you'll actually follow WP:NPOV for once. Have a good day. John Asfukzenski ( talk) 05:23, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
I have reverted you (again) on this article. Please seek dispute resolution, as it appears likely that neither of us is willing to back down over the inclusion or exclusion of a single word. Horologium (talk) 20:24, 7 November 2009 (UTC) |
Resolved for now |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
What is your problem???????????? Please discuss on the dyslexia discussion page aqnd stop deleting parts of the article which are well researched. dolfrog ( talk) 19:03, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
|
FYI Jeepday ( talk) 00:02, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:HATNOTE#Disambiguating_article_names_that_are_not_ambiguous - dismabiguation hatnotes are almost certainly not required here since we only have one article about a band called Wire. If you arrived at Wire (band) when looking for a different usage of 'Wire', it's probably because a link needs fixing somewhere. Where was the link that took you to Wire (band) that you expected to take you elsewhere?-- Michig ( talk) 19:17, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello, you edited out my contribution to Western Concert Flute. Is the issue the content or how I presented it? Because if it is about content, well the content is correct, but if it is about style then I can fix that. Can you please let me know 70.24.218.91 ( talk) 19:01, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
If you navigate the website you can find this page. http://s613.photobucket.com/albums/tt218/JUPITAH/?action=view¤t=statement.png&newest=1 Happy now? It's not like you can't look at tons of images of her and not notice how orange her hair is without the confirmation anyway. http://www.mariowiki.com/Princess_Daisy/Gallery FD09 ( talk) 23:30, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
You seem to have accidentally removed other people's comments a couple times now on ANI. Would you mind restoring them? Mr. Z-man 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Let it be cropped.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. dave pape ( talk) 02:57, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I noted your entry at Ckatz's talk page concerning her/his reversion of all the work I've done today in improving the formatting of TV articles. It is very frustrating, since Ckatz has been running a one-person campaign against WP:OVERLINK for about two years now. I believe this editor is trying to bring the matter to a head by stalking me. A great pity. I am restoring the work, article by article (what a waste of time), and retaining the TV network links, which is fair enough (once, first occurrence). Thanks. Tony (talk) 07:04, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
I checked the liner notes, and there is nothing about that Beatles song being sampled. The notes say "Contains elements of 'Apache' by The Sugar Hill Gang ... Also contains elements of 'Jam on the Groove' by Ralph McDonald ... Lastly, contains elements of 'Human Beat Box' by The Fat Boys" Dan56 ( talk) 21:22, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
I do not own Blastoise's Father, but since it has gotten over 600 hits in like three days, and I find it to be a funny site, I find it deserves mention. -scwinsett —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scwinsett ( talk • contribs) 01:37, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
I've proposed a new lead sentence at Talk:Optical_fiber#New_lead_sentence. ( X! · talk) · @632 · 14:10, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
I am aware of the general editorial rule, having worked as an editor, but I see "Show precise mathematical quantities, measurements, stock prices, etc., as figures" at Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Number_signs, so I think the article was correct as you encountered it. -- WeijiBaikeBianji ( talk) 16:12, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Sure I'm happy to help; if you need any assistance with anything in the future, let me know. Thanks for your note. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 03:49, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
Don't lecture me about wikipedia policy on opinions, the article in question is loaded with opinions, in addition my edit that points out that it was reported that Mr. Trudeau was voted most likely to succeed FACTUALLY does appear to contradict his recent assertion that he almost flunked out of high school. Secondly, the wording regarding "most in the scientific" community is WEASEL wording; can you prove that MOST scientists believe that the so-called 'Law of Attraction' is pseudoscience? Where are the numbers to back up that assertion? Did someone take a poll? Perhaps most scientists believe that the so-called "Law of Attraction" isn't even pseudoscience let alone science or perhaps only a minority believe it is pseudoscience, the reference cited doesn't back up the assertion made. Be a bit more professional and thorough in future. 24.200.55.244 ( talk) 00:28, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
You and User:Jjozoko are (slowly) edit warring over this article, as you know, with considerable changes to it back and forth, over and over. I wish you would both discuss your issues on the talk page there instead of doing it only in your edit summaries. Cordially, SergeWoodzing ( talk) 17:20, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Check the Holy Wood (In the Shadow of the Valley of Death) article again. I've added (and still adding) the requisite references to bolster my "original research". It's difficult to dig up, dust off and pour through articles literally a decade old and referencing or correcting what I wrote so please give me a little leeway. Thanks. - Red marquis ( talk) 11:06, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
I'm not sure why you think you did anyone a favor by removing what I posted about Primus producing a new album following their current tour, but I'm not sure about many things. The one thing I am sure of, is that I watched the live webcast of Primus at Red Rocks on the night of August 12th. I also know that there was an interview with Les Claypool broadcast in between the showing of Gogol Bordello and Primus, during which Les specifically stated what I had indicated in my post. I thought I had cited enough details, trying to show that what I had indicated was not bull. Anyone who might actually be a Primus fan (which you claim to be) would have probably seen the same show and interview, and would know that what I had written was in fact all true. Additionally, if I could have provided a link, or otherwise substantial proof, I would have. Unfortunately, the show and interview are not currently available. If you go to the webcast host iClips, it is indicated that the show may be available soon to premium members of iClips, so hopefully the interview will be a part of that. Please know this also, I take everything about Primus very seriously, and would not have posted the information if it was untrue. Ch2375 ( talk) 05:22, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Re your recent removal of material.You also removed the 2 references for all the new information that I added.If you didnt like the style please feel free to improve rather than just delete information which is counter productive.Thankyou Claudia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.153.156.187 ( talk) 02:38, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
User:205.232.191.16 just vandalized another page ( for Das Lied von der Erde). I noticed that you added a ban warning at the bottom of their talk page giving them a final warning. What needs to be done? -- Sstrader ( talk) 14:42, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#MOS:JP – Romanization for words of English origin and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Thanks, Prime Blue ( talk) 22:19, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
A request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to Video games developed in Japan was recently filed. As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. The process of mediation is entirely voluntary and focuses exclusively on the content issues over which there is disagreement. Please review the request page and the guide to mediation requests and then indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you would agree to participate. Discussion relating to the mediation request welcome at the case talk page.
Thank you, AGK 22:58, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello, DKqwerty. I see you around often, and thought I would ask you this question since you are so active around Wikipedia and know it pretty well. I feel like an idiot for asking, being an experienced editor here and all as well, but how do you e-mail users? I've already looked at Wikipedia:E-mailing users, but I don't see an option coming up...not even at my own user page. Flyer22 ( talk) 20:30, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
It is overlinking since the word is already linked in the lead paragraph -- Lyverbe ( talk) 15:06, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
The request for mediation concerning Video games developed in Japan, to which you were are a party, has been accepted. Please watchlist the case page (which is where the mediation will take place). For guidance on accepted cases, refer to this resource. A mediator should be assigned to this dispute within two weeks. If you have any queries, please contact a Committee member or the mediation mailing list.
For the Mediation Committee,
AGK
21:36, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Message delivered by
MediationBot, on
behalf of the Mediation Committee.
The ref I added 1 may have a bad color scheme. But if you read the paper linked on the page. http://n3on.org/projects/reCAPTCHA/docs/reCAPTCHA.docx You will see that it is an academic paper from the person who discovered the crack. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.194.190.179 ( talk) 16:13, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Regarding your note on my talk page regarding my using the talk page of the “Judicial Activism” article for general discussion, I didn’t see you leave a similar admonition on the talk page of the poster I was answering who had started the relevant section. In that section, he matter-of-factly notes that Bush vs. Gore should be used as an example of judicial activism in a manner that amounted to a political editorial disguised as a question. It is impossible to address that naked assertion without discussing the relevant facts involved and noting why one either agrees or disagrees with the suggestion that such be included in the article. Such is inherent within the subject and cannot be avoided in discussion.
As it is said, what’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. I’ve never noted geese having political biases...before. HistoryBuff14 ( talk) 18:24, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
--Agreed and thank you. HistoryBuff14 ( talk) 18:42, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello DKqwerty, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Lynda Mason Green, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Courcelles 12:28, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
You may or may not remember but you left a message based on my 'edits' regardng changing plot to story. I completely understand that you have set guidelines and you will adhere to them as necesary. Personally I believe that these guidelines regarding what is story and plot, such as considering a lengthy article with detail 'plot', to be wrong. However I will keep that as my own opinion and do promise not to make anymore changes unless I become I full member, to which I will then discuss my opinions rather than edit on a whim. I also see, now, that my changes were made in vain as people will revert it due to it being their 'job'. Just so we're clear I'm not trying to be sarcastic or smart or "attack" you (as a person), just wanted to say my piece. Thanks.
We should take exceptional care to modify quotes only where needed. Having his first name and the link is overkill, and we should only have one. My personal preference is to keep the link because that provides sufficient context without actually modifying the quote. But if you prefer the first name instead I'd be happy to cede to that. However; both? Not really a good idea. -- Errant ( chat!) 14:38, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
You know, it's actually nice to edit with someone who knows the WPedit policy so well. I hope the latest update works for you, and I appreciate the edit summaries you put in, they do help me understand better.-- 68.81.89.233 ( talk) 00:50, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
What is required is verifiable sources, not your opinion as to its neutrality. And it's "a neutral" source. Why not just come out and be honest and say you want the article to misleading imply that Assange fled Swedish justice when fully sited sources show him to have been given permission by the courts. Unless you can provide anything verifiable to the opposite. And I also see a reference to "a lawyer", since when is that "an neutral" source?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/guyrundle
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_Assange Viralmeme ( talk) 17:27, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed you tried to shrink the size of this image. Another editor undid your change before I could. I would just like to remind you, Wikimedia's policy on image size, per their upload form, is to "Upload the highest resolution file that is possible" regardless what is being photographed.
Thegreyanomaly ( talk) 00:57, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Per your request, I've left a response to your WP:BRD request. -- Teancum ( talk) 14:12, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
The dispute about romanizations for katakana words of non-Japanese origin has now entered mediation and is currently being talked about in this discussion page section. If you still wish to participate, please join the discussion. Thank you. Prime Blue ( talk) 14:09, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
Greetings, DKqwerty. An anonymous editor has started a discussion about your recent reversion of his edits, at Talk:Owsley Stanley#Mention of Stanley's name in a Frank Zappa song. Feel free to reply there. Thanks. — Mudwater ( Talk) 00:18, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
Template:1/2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —
Justin (koavf)❤
T☮
C☺
M☯
19:30, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I not agree to your personal definition of overlinking it's not backed by our policies, please step back from reverting again. In contrast, our link policies Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Linking encouraging a strong interconnection of pages with non-trivial subjects, "Remake" (in context video games) is a non-trivial concept not well known in broader audience. Shaddim ( talk) 10:49, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nintendo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HD ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:48, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
I stopped on WOIO and desisted on that one after two attempts; the rest of my reverts have been dealing with TRCG under other IP's. Nate • ( chatter) 03:12, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
There is no evidence, only unsourced opinion, that the links to the Budweiser Clydesdale commercials on YouTube are copyright violations. For one thing, the earliest link dates to 1967 and might even be in the public domain by now. Montanabw (talk) 23:57, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Is there some WP authority for the proper length of headings? I agree that the headings prior user:Theonesean's revision were too long. Absent specific WP rule or advisory guidance, it seems some middle ground is appropriate. Several words for a heading is common on WP. Regards, Paavo273 ( talk) 17:08, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I'm curious why a redirect page I created here doesn't actually redirect, it just shows the redirect page itself. Any help is appreciated, thanks! DKqwerty ( talk) 01:12, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Well, none of those characters expressed a belief in God and seem to be indifferent to God. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.140.66.148 ( talk) 18:14, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
I'm afraid that I'm going to have to disagree with you there. In good faith I have removed images that I felt did not belong on Wikipedia, or at least on the pages they were on. The uploader will receive a notification that the image has been orphaned, and the uploader can protest the removal at which point discussion can take place as to whether the image should be kept or removed. We cannot allow progress in improving Wikipedia to be halted by constant bureaucracy or democracy. Why bring an image to deletion when the outcome will be the same regardless of whether it's deleted by being orphaned or deleted by being voted on? - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 18:44, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
So, I saw this. I agree, his edits aren't accomplishing much, and its a little irritating to see them on my watchlist all the time, but you can't really tell him to stop editing the article over it. He's not really breaking any policy, and the article is both in relatively poor shape, and inactive. It needs clean up, he's making the changes in good-faith, and its not like he's causing edit conflicts right and left or something... Anyways, just thought I'd throw that out there... Sergecross73 msg me 15:30, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi DKqwerty,
thanks a lot for your advice and teaching. Happy editing to you too.
--
Mauro Lanari (
talk)
01:28, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mario Kart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Invisibility cloak ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:16, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
It makes no sense what you say. The series is part of Nick's current programming. No particular purpose. -- Connie (A.K) ( talk) 04:13, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
You previously participated in the merge discussion for this at Talk:List_of_variations_of_the_Mega_Drive#Proposed_merge_with_Sega_Genesis. The nominator has restarted it again at Talk:Sega_Genesis#Merge.2FRedirect_Proposal:_List_of_variations_of_the_Mega_Drive. I think it only fair that those who participated previously be told. Dream Focus 23:59, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Give me a little time to work on them. I may not have the sources instantly, so I will put {{ ref improve section}}. Even so, I think that the titles and lyrics of some entries are enough attribution, but if you disagree, I'll be happy to find some sources. Please don't remove them outright and then make 3RR accusations. Thanks, Epicgenius ( talk) 19:29, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amarcord, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Letterboxing. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:24, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi, please review the diff of your reversion of my edits to the mentioned article. Your edit summary doesn't match what you have actually done, I think you may have made an error: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Speech_recognition_software_for_Linux&type=revision&diff=801673337&oldid=799936826 -- I think you may have intended to revert Bert Niehaus's edits, not mine. Thanks. -- BurritoBazooka If you reply here, please add {{ping|BurritoBazooka}} to your message 15:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, DKqwerty. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, DKqwerty. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, DKqwerty. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
WBFS. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 16#WBFS until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –
void
xor
23:28, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Literaturegeek |
T@1k?
06:31, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article
Paroxetine has an
edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did and why. Thank you. Regarding
this reversion, please do not characterize good-faith editing as
WP:Vandalism. Remember that one of Wikipedia's core guidelines is
Wikipedia:Assume good faith.
--Dynaflow
babble
11:34, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Hey DK. I appreciate your good faith discussion. I actually did add a source if you look at the history. There are of course lots more. Cheers. ChildofMidnight ( talk) 05:22, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
|
This is all relative.
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Care to explain those removals? You even claimed the MD link didn't mention MD - very ironic. I didn't see much wrong with those sections, not at least meriting a total removal. If you don't integrate some of the texts back into the article, I'll figure a way to make them legitimate, but like I said, total removal of those sections is very much uncalled for. Otvaltak ( talk) 22:34, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
|
Excuse us here at the UWEC, but in actual truths, we actually were not really testing-we were partly redesigning certain portions of French fries, and we'd never purposely vandalize any articles. Sorry of the mistake-please give us any insights or view you have on the article portion we edited. We represent University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire-in the reality, testings aren't what we are here doing. Please help us out so that the testing notes will not pop onto our college usertalk pages again. We're sorry for inconvenience caused by that editing we did with "French fries." What was the problem?
The UWEC at 173.19.119.172 ( talk) 04:08, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Yes, I am a very awkward, I am very straight forward and random. And no, I do not see it as conflict of Interests. I love my neighbor and my enemy, but I do not follow their steps nor their beliefs. I DO NOT DISCRIMINATE, I am not a hypocrite. I am a Republican, and believe in Republican and Christian values. The band t.A.T.u. is my favorite band, i love their music not their actions. I have proof that Barack Obama is a Muslim, but I can not express myself. I believe my Freedom of Speech and Right are violated. I edited United States of America showing that it was formed under Christian founders, but they deleted my sentences and say I just committed vandalism. I believe Wikipedia is not being fair to me, i can not edit or show my point of view, only the others. JonasanRat7 ( talk)JonasanRat7 —Preceding undated comment added 04:23, 12 June 2009 (UTC).
(EC-OD)To everyone involved, this conversation doesn't really appear to be going anywhere, and certainly doesn't appear to be geared towards helping to create an encyclopedia. I'll politely suggest that this conversation just stop before we get too deep into insults and personal attacks. I see Swimmerfreak has retracted one of his comments, good for him. Good luck in the future to everyone involved. Dayewalker ( talk) 05:25, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is JonasanRat7. Thank you.— Dæ dαlus Contribs 06:22, 12 June 2009 (UTC) |
Thanks for weighing in on the Dr90s issue at AN/I. It's depressing going back through the history of this Dr90s character. I only became involved in the matter 6 months ago but his history as far as I can trace it goes back to at least May 2008. In looking back like this, I see a lot of trouble from this guy and in some cases it appears he has contributed to the retirement of valuable and productive editors like User:The Prince of Darkness. As this retired editor's "farewell message" says, "I developed stress and often became very angry or depressed by having edit wars and pointless discussions with other editors. I'm also very tired of having to revert vandalism done by IP addresses (if only registration was required...). So what I really need to do is leave, because I don't think Wikipedia is good for my health." Judging by earlier unsuccessful Dr90s reports like this, it appears clear that Dr90s' tendentious editing style has done serious damage to Wikipedia. I have lost the optimism I once had on the issue, and I honestly don't think we'll ever be free of this obsessed guy. My goal now is to build up tools that normal editors can use to rid us of his corrupting influence. The AN/I sanction is an important step since it makes Sockpuppet reports easier to file. I appreciate your support in the matter greatly. Cheers, - Thibbs ( talk) 13:58, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
In this edit, [1] you added a See also reference to a non existing page. There's a Wikipedia note about doing so at WP:ALSO; it's recommended not to link to uncreated pages in See also sections. Thanks, and good editing! Newportm ( talk) 00:29, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
|
Please explain your edits in this artile and what do you consider 'unsourced'?-- MathFacts ( talk) 17:09, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Since July 1 you trying to stalk me down (although the truth
|
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
I see the IP repeatedly entering Season 7. If you keep changing it back yourself, I fear you could inadvertantly violate 3RR, and you do too much good work to be blocked. I'll try to keep my eye open and help our where I can - but I hope you perhaps will call in an admin to help you with this person who doesn't quite understand the rules. Alternately, you could let him list "Season 7 in production" as CBS has announced they renewed the show. I apologise if I have stuck my big Irish nose in where it doesn't belong. Look at my contribs and you will see I hate van.... um, uncited changes as much as you. But do not want to see an edit war with this person and you - it looks like he's hopping IP's anyway, so he will be harder to nail. I will help you if I can, but only if you want it. Cheers, TristaBella ( talk) 23:38, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
|
Please remember to
assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you. —
Please comment
R
2
15:52, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Hello!! I was accused of vandalism...?!? Why?! Lightwarrior2 ( talk) 02:41, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
|
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. =) Impala2009 | Talk 00:59, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Just curious as to why the notes I added re: the song "Thriller" were removed. The song was featured in the SoBe Life Water commercial and in the movie "Revenge of the Nerds." For verification, you can always look them up on You Tube, or rent the DVD (of the movie). I have no reason to make this up. 98.218.111.226 ( talk) 21:46, 10 July 2009 (UTC) V1iciouslady
Hi there,
Thanks for your edits to the article, but please take note of the three revert rule. If you revert another user's edits more than 3 times in 24 hours, you can be blocked from editing. I strongly suggest talking things over at the article talk page and reaching a consensus about the article content. Let me know if I can help. Papa November ( talk) 23:11, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
{{tracklist}}
template to the Collector's Edition in favor of a sloppy, bulleted, improperly-titled list of tracks, please chime in on either the user's or article's talk page. If I've done something wrong or against precedent, I'd be happy to leave this alone. But I can not see how most of what he reverted (which were not just edits I had made, but edits by others as well) was anything but improvements.Firstly, I made a mistake when I reverted the track templates. I was looking at the page diff comparision, so I only saw the extra tracklist section. Misremembering how the main tracklist section was formatted in this page, I mistakenly thought that the main and extra tracklist sections used inconsistent formatting, so I tried to recitfy that. I apologize. Secondly, the "who?" template is incorrectly used. The subject is stated (music critics), which is all we need; as this is the lead section of the article, specifying which critics hold this opinion would make the section unnecessarily long. Per WP:LEAD, we kept it simple; specifics are discussed in the article body. If you have a better way to convey the same information, feel free to edit the lead, but the template is unnecessary. As for English in the album infoboxes, that's one of Koavf's editing ticks. He keeps insisting on putting a language in the infobox even though neither the album infobox page nor WikiProject albums instruct people to do so (regardless, that hasn't stopped him from trying to cite both as indicating the field should be included, even though I've pointed out to him before that that is false). It's not something I go out of my way to remove; if I see it in a page I'm editing I remove it, because it isn't particularly useful, it's not part of the template script, he's the only one who inserts it, and other editors have done the same. WesleyDodds ( talk) 03:56, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Please clarify how my edit to Barack Obama's wikipedia page in any way violated any wikipedia TOS. My entry changed "was born at" to "is thought to have been born at" and also added "No official documentation of his exact birth location has ever been released or confirmed." How can this possibly be defamatory? Is it factually untrue? If you consider it unsourced, that's quite the point - there is no official confirmation, just news articles which only in the past week changed the birth hospital from Queen's Hospital to Kapi'olani, shortly after WND broke the story of the Obama letter. Amazingly, the change to Kapi'olani as the birth place was coincident with that hospital removing the Obama letter stating he was born there. There is not only no official or primary source verification that Kapi'olani is the birth place, there is active controversy and evidence of a cover up. To state as fact his birth location at this point is grossly irresponsible. If you can produce any official documentation of the birth location, please do. Otherwise, accept that there is a controversy. Your Orwellian tactics simply add to my concerns that wikipedia is a fundamentally biased site. Jwbaumann ( talk) 06:17, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Spoken like a true wikipedian. My point is made. Thank you. Jwbaumann ( talk) 17:25, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
In a case of life imitating art, I saw a story that some military officer is refusing to go back to Afghanistan on the grounds that Obama is not eligible to be President. He probably figures that's better than coming out and saying, "I don't wanna get shot!" Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 12:26, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello DKquerty, IP editor 66.67.100.83 has made a comment about an athlete who was reverted as being non-notable. As the editor who made the reversion, I thought perhaps you'd like to comment or follow the discussion. If not that's cool too. Thanks, -- JBC3 ( talk) 15:18, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
That guy was given a short block, a year ago, apparently for sockpuppetry. So why is he still here, I wonder? Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 12:23, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Looks like you've acquired an impersonator at DKqwenty ( talk · contribs). Any idea who it might be? Dayewalker ( talk) 13:17, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
It appears you have been in a conflict with 92.239.38.135 ( talk · contribs) about them removing comments from their talk page. I'm writing to make you aware that users (including anonymous IP editors) are allowed to remove warnings and comments from their talk pages. Doing so is considered acknowledgment of having read them. Restoring warnings and comments to other users' talk pages after they have removed them is considered disruption. There are important exceptions to this:
{{
unblock}}
requests before the block expires{{
sharedIPEDU}}
{{
sockpuppet}}
or confirmed {{
sockpuppeteer}}
tags from their talk pages.I hope this clears things up. Toddst1 ( talk) 15:36, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
See user:Calcentnavania2,100 -- Omarcheeseboro ( talk) 19:40, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
You tried to do a cut and past move of Those Damned Blue Collar Tweekers -> Those Damned Blue-Collar Tweekers, but moving pages this way doesn't move the page history. You should move pages using the "move" tab atop the article, or if it blocks you, put it on Requested moves for an administrator to do it. -- Austin512 ( talk • contribs) 03:24, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
OK, it just looked suspicious for someone to remove a category, but if it's not for DS, then it never really should have been there I suppose. Darktower 12345 ( talk) 02:52, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Johnny Depp has been confirmed to play the Mad Hatter in Tim Burton's Alice In Wonderland film. How can that cause vandalism? We're allowed to include random references to the character but we can't include an actor who's own page lists "Mad Hatter" as who he's playing in an upcoming film?-- 67.34.181.210 ( talk) 15:05, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
RE: Sumer Camp
I know I shouldnt of put it on, I knew that before you removed it, I belive I did remove it, But I must of thought I did, then againg, sory.
Your note:
Please do not use styles that are unusual or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in
Template:Obama Executive Office. There is a
Manual of Style that should be followed. Thank you. Specifically: title case should always be used, not all caps; the form "since XXXX" should be used rather than "XXXX—" per
WP:OTHERDATE; an en-dash ("–") or em-dash ("—") should always be used rather than a double hyphen ("--"); Please take a moment to read over the manual of style and use it as a guide for future editing. Thank you.
DKqwerty (
talk)
01:22, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
Response:
WP:OTHERDATE does NOT disallow dates with hyphens in tables. It discusses how to best use them. Please carefully read the provisions before calling out others for not following them.
WP:MOS applies to text; it says nothing about all caps captions in tables. That said, it does not matter to me either way, so I will use title case in my next edit of the templates.
You are correct about the double hyphen, and I will use the em-dash instead. Thank you.
I see that you have had that same issue with another person who was trying to edit the templates last month. To avoid a misunderstanding, perhaps I should explain why I am making the edits: it is to make the tables more readable. When the word "since" is removed, the spacing is much improved, the tables are half the length, and they can be viewed without excessive use of page downs. This is especially important in the Obama administration set of templates which have been stacked in multiple layers. Often the length of the templates exceeds the length of the biographical article on the Obama administration official.
Furthermore, as indicated in the MOS, "Printers and screen-readers will both output only the content that is immediately visible on the page". Therefore the tables with the "since" removed are more accessible and printable as well.
I trust that you will not revert these changes unless you can justify the unnecessary length, readablity and printability issues that your changes produce. --Regards W E Hill ( talk) 12:20, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
I noticed the work you have been doing on the Jaco Pastorius article- the photos of him young I posted.. I don't have as much time as I'd like but this is a very noteworthy musician, I feel, and deserving of time and care. Thanks so much! -- Leahtwosaints ( talk) 22:50, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Please
assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. If you continue to assume bad faith, you will be blocked from editing.
70.245.239.63 (
talk)
14:27, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
I warned the IP to the vandalism to your page, I'd suggest WP:SPI.-- SKATER Speak.
::Hmm...Should I request Checkuser for this one? I'm still debating it.--
SKATER
Speak.
19:53, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
[3] I'm not bad at math or anything, what I meant was that I was basically halfing the size of the image, having it as 200px size (which I tried in preview) made it too small. • GunMetal Angel 00:48, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Glad we could sort that out - would have been just as happy to discuss with you directly. Re: 'national park'; I actually got there looking for something different myself and decided the disambiguation wasn't clear enough (it wasn't one of my random edits). Understand if people disagree but but non-pluralised 'national park' is used extensively in an international context and most of my additions were in 'see also' anyway. The list is actually the direct result of the search of wikipedia for 'national park' so suggesting they are not what someone would go searching for is mistaken. Anyway, I won't bother amending it if there is a massive movement against national park disambiguation change but I thought I'd at least explain it. Happy hunting. Stalwart111 ( talk) 03:54, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
blah blah blah...the song remains the same |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
This is the second time a significant piece of information I have added to an article has deleted by some tyrant who apparently enforces som sort de facto ownership of it. I have no intention of ruining anything, I act on Wikipedia written request to improve Wikipedia. Wikipedia will have a bad future if your action is standard procedure in handling good faithed contributions. "Campus" has become what the article (now again) says, but is since America is only 200 years old, the term traditionally means what I have wrote. The article's very American definition contradicts the real meaning of the term, since university areas is far from open spaces and America is not equivalent with the world. I am sorry, but tradition did not start with the establishment of American universities. Tradition has traditionally a long tradition. The temp "campus" (and especially since the term "traditionally") is NOT equivilent with university araes and what do you care, apparantly you are a dane like me. You have no idea how provocative your destructive and arbitrary action is after the time efford one has invested in improving an article, and the sentence "good-faith edit by ...... this is an article on the subject, not a dictionary entry or study of etymology" does not justify your action. Actually it makes it worse since good faith has to be respected and in Wikipedia my opinion about terms origin should be stated is as good as yours. Many articles starts with a short explaination of a term's origin. If you respect good faith, not to mention solid facts, please undo your badly chosen action, and add something (instead of delete, (you do not own this article)), I do not want go into an "undo" war again and afterwards being blamed for mockering, which I have experienced once before - and lecture is that contribution is not worth the efford. Actually I don't know why I still bother. So PLEASE - I invite you to change the article so my additions is included in a way, that satisfy you. But since you are so wise, please instruct me how to wage an editorial war in which you so obviously have have drawn first blood so we both end up being banned - my previous experience is that in a Wikipedia sence, on can wage a war alone. have a nice day |
Hi! Noticed your edit. Had to correct it. Check the [Dual_Analog_Controller] article and you'll find that the first versions of the controller, released in Japan, had rumble. Sony took it out before the US release because they didn't think it was important enough to keep in. It's sourced and referenced as well. Cheers! 208.115.94.237 ( talk) 11:33, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. I think adding "during meiosis" is appropriately brief context for the lay reader when mentioning a relatively poorly understood subject like 'genetic recombination' in the Evolution article's lead section. I've left a note regarding this in an ongoing thread at Talk:Evolution#Reliance_on_wikilinking, and would like to know your thoughts. Cheers, Emw ( talk) 22:08, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
What kind of photos did you have in mind for navel? Have you found any examples on the internet, even if it's not free copyright, just so I can get the idea of what you are searching for? Nocturnal Wanderer 22:33, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for removing those edits from the Sandbox, clearly the person doesn't care much for privacy. Either way I've requested Suppression of the diffs. Jeffrey Mall ( talk • contribs) - 02:40, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
You put the hat fold on a section of discussion on the Barack Obama article that really doesn't make a whit of sense. There is a thread about whether to include a specific clause in the article (one that moreover has been in there), about how "early in the initiative that won the Novel prize" this one was. As these things do, I confess some editors veered slightly into ranting territory. But the basic point of including or not including a clause in the article is rather centrally related to article quality. It's wholly inappropriate to hide away a topic that is directly related to a current editing issue about which good faith editors reasonably differ in opinion! LotLE× talk 19:47, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Im telling you this because i think its gone on to long. You have failed to realize that Rochester's population is not 199,000 but 206,000 as you reverted an editor who fixed my vandalism. You also have failed to notice the census tables false information which includes a 2011 estimate! 67.240.191.249 ( talk) 00:24, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Sometime in late August or early September AHAF's Macular Degeneration Research link was added along with the MD Support link on the macular degeneration wiki article. I had nothing to do with those additions. Yesterday, you personally removed the link. I noticed that you removed it, so I added it back. Yes, I am employed with this Foundation as the Website Content Specialist/Production Assistant and I haven't tried to hide or deny that fact. Also, I'm brand new to Wikipedia and quite busy with many other responsibilities. Therefore, I did not notice that a WP:COI regulation existed.
The American Health Assistance Foundation (AHAF) is a registered 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that meets BBB charity standards http://charityreports.bbb.org/public/seal.aspx?ID=3305112007 and meets the standards of HONcode https://www.hon.ch/HONcode/Conduct.html?HONConduct619602.
I have found many examples where non-profits similar to AHAF are included in the external link section of the diseases they provide information about. This leads me to believe that a link to AHAF's Macular Degeneration Research would be encouraged.
I strongly feel that the (Macular Degeneration Research) external link is informative, up to date and provides services which other macular degeneration related websites do not. AHAF's website is clearly not spam. If you take the time to look beyond our program landing page and into the heart of our website, you will find detailed information regarding the research that we are currently funding and have funded in the past, you will also find information such as risk factors, screening and diagnosis, treatment options, adjusting to the home for those with low vision, an updated questions and answers section etc...
Here I will cite the reason per Wikipedia that our link should be included as an external link for this article.
WP:ELYES Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to copyright issues, amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks) or other reasons.
So, let's have an honest, open discussion. If I'm misinterpreting Wikipedia’s stance regarding external links, I'd appreciate if you would take the time to explain to me in a respectful manner how and why? Also, I'd appreciate if you would not cite WP:COI because I only recently became involved in this situation and you have removed this link in the past prior to my involvement.
Sdisandro ( talk) 14:56, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Please visit the discussion page for the Foreign policy of the Barack Obama administration article or my talk page to discuss your reasons why you reverted Venomviper edits to the article. Edward Lalone | ( Talk)
Hi - I noticed you have contributed recently to one or more of the decade articles ( 1990s, 1960s etc). I am proposing some major changes to these articles, as I have outlined in Talk:1990s/Archives/2012#Suggested_reform_of_decade_articles, and I would be interested in hearing your views in the first instance. Thanks. Kransky ( talk) 08:43, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
This went nowhere |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
The admin Horologium has picked up on your absurd edit to the Virginia Foxx article and determined it was POV. Hopefully someday you'll actually follow WP:NPOV for once. Have a good day. John Asfukzenski ( talk) 05:23, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
I have reverted you (again) on this article. Please seek dispute resolution, as it appears likely that neither of us is willing to back down over the inclusion or exclusion of a single word. Horologium (talk) 20:24, 7 November 2009 (UTC) |
Resolved for now |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
What is your problem???????????? Please discuss on the dyslexia discussion page aqnd stop deleting parts of the article which are well researched. dolfrog ( talk) 19:03, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
|
FYI Jeepday ( talk) 00:02, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:HATNOTE#Disambiguating_article_names_that_are_not_ambiguous - dismabiguation hatnotes are almost certainly not required here since we only have one article about a band called Wire. If you arrived at Wire (band) when looking for a different usage of 'Wire', it's probably because a link needs fixing somewhere. Where was the link that took you to Wire (band) that you expected to take you elsewhere?-- Michig ( talk) 19:17, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello, you edited out my contribution to Western Concert Flute. Is the issue the content or how I presented it? Because if it is about content, well the content is correct, but if it is about style then I can fix that. Can you please let me know 70.24.218.91 ( talk) 19:01, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
If you navigate the website you can find this page. http://s613.photobucket.com/albums/tt218/JUPITAH/?action=view¤t=statement.png&newest=1 Happy now? It's not like you can't look at tons of images of her and not notice how orange her hair is without the confirmation anyway. http://www.mariowiki.com/Princess_Daisy/Gallery FD09 ( talk) 23:30, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
You seem to have accidentally removed other people's comments a couple times now on ANI. Would you mind restoring them? Mr. Z-man 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Let it be cropped.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. dave pape ( talk) 02:57, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I noted your entry at Ckatz's talk page concerning her/his reversion of all the work I've done today in improving the formatting of TV articles. It is very frustrating, since Ckatz has been running a one-person campaign against WP:OVERLINK for about two years now. I believe this editor is trying to bring the matter to a head by stalking me. A great pity. I am restoring the work, article by article (what a waste of time), and retaining the TV network links, which is fair enough (once, first occurrence). Thanks. Tony (talk) 07:04, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
I checked the liner notes, and there is nothing about that Beatles song being sampled. The notes say "Contains elements of 'Apache' by The Sugar Hill Gang ... Also contains elements of 'Jam on the Groove' by Ralph McDonald ... Lastly, contains elements of 'Human Beat Box' by The Fat Boys" Dan56 ( talk) 21:22, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
I do not own Blastoise's Father, but since it has gotten over 600 hits in like three days, and I find it to be a funny site, I find it deserves mention. -scwinsett —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scwinsett ( talk • contribs) 01:37, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
I've proposed a new lead sentence at Talk:Optical_fiber#New_lead_sentence. ( X! · talk) · @632 · 14:10, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
I am aware of the general editorial rule, having worked as an editor, but I see "Show precise mathematical quantities, measurements, stock prices, etc., as figures" at Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Number_signs, so I think the article was correct as you encountered it. -- WeijiBaikeBianji ( talk) 16:12, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Sure I'm happy to help; if you need any assistance with anything in the future, let me know. Thanks for your note. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 03:49, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
Don't lecture me about wikipedia policy on opinions, the article in question is loaded with opinions, in addition my edit that points out that it was reported that Mr. Trudeau was voted most likely to succeed FACTUALLY does appear to contradict his recent assertion that he almost flunked out of high school. Secondly, the wording regarding "most in the scientific" community is WEASEL wording; can you prove that MOST scientists believe that the so-called 'Law of Attraction' is pseudoscience? Where are the numbers to back up that assertion? Did someone take a poll? Perhaps most scientists believe that the so-called "Law of Attraction" isn't even pseudoscience let alone science or perhaps only a minority believe it is pseudoscience, the reference cited doesn't back up the assertion made. Be a bit more professional and thorough in future. 24.200.55.244 ( talk) 00:28, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
You and User:Jjozoko are (slowly) edit warring over this article, as you know, with considerable changes to it back and forth, over and over. I wish you would both discuss your issues on the talk page there instead of doing it only in your edit summaries. Cordially, SergeWoodzing ( talk) 17:20, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Check the Holy Wood (In the Shadow of the Valley of Death) article again. I've added (and still adding) the requisite references to bolster my "original research". It's difficult to dig up, dust off and pour through articles literally a decade old and referencing or correcting what I wrote so please give me a little leeway. Thanks. - Red marquis ( talk) 11:06, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
I'm not sure why you think you did anyone a favor by removing what I posted about Primus producing a new album following their current tour, but I'm not sure about many things. The one thing I am sure of, is that I watched the live webcast of Primus at Red Rocks on the night of August 12th. I also know that there was an interview with Les Claypool broadcast in between the showing of Gogol Bordello and Primus, during which Les specifically stated what I had indicated in my post. I thought I had cited enough details, trying to show that what I had indicated was not bull. Anyone who might actually be a Primus fan (which you claim to be) would have probably seen the same show and interview, and would know that what I had written was in fact all true. Additionally, if I could have provided a link, or otherwise substantial proof, I would have. Unfortunately, the show and interview are not currently available. If you go to the webcast host iClips, it is indicated that the show may be available soon to premium members of iClips, so hopefully the interview will be a part of that. Please know this also, I take everything about Primus very seriously, and would not have posted the information if it was untrue. Ch2375 ( talk) 05:22, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Re your recent removal of material.You also removed the 2 references for all the new information that I added.If you didnt like the style please feel free to improve rather than just delete information which is counter productive.Thankyou Claudia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.153.156.187 ( talk) 02:38, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
User:205.232.191.16 just vandalized another page ( for Das Lied von der Erde). I noticed that you added a ban warning at the bottom of their talk page giving them a final warning. What needs to be done? -- Sstrader ( talk) 14:42, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#MOS:JP – Romanization for words of English origin and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Thanks, Prime Blue ( talk) 22:19, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
A request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to Video games developed in Japan was recently filed. As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. The process of mediation is entirely voluntary and focuses exclusively on the content issues over which there is disagreement. Please review the request page and the guide to mediation requests and then indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you would agree to participate. Discussion relating to the mediation request welcome at the case talk page.
Thank you, AGK 22:58, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello, DKqwerty. I see you around often, and thought I would ask you this question since you are so active around Wikipedia and know it pretty well. I feel like an idiot for asking, being an experienced editor here and all as well, but how do you e-mail users? I've already looked at Wikipedia:E-mailing users, but I don't see an option coming up...not even at my own user page. Flyer22 ( talk) 20:30, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
It is overlinking since the word is already linked in the lead paragraph -- Lyverbe ( talk) 15:06, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
The request for mediation concerning Video games developed in Japan, to which you were are a party, has been accepted. Please watchlist the case page (which is where the mediation will take place). For guidance on accepted cases, refer to this resource. A mediator should be assigned to this dispute within two weeks. If you have any queries, please contact a Committee member or the mediation mailing list.
For the Mediation Committee,
AGK
21:36, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Message delivered by
MediationBot, on
behalf of the Mediation Committee.
The ref I added 1 may have a bad color scheme. But if you read the paper linked on the page. http://n3on.org/projects/reCAPTCHA/docs/reCAPTCHA.docx You will see that it is an academic paper from the person who discovered the crack. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.194.190.179 ( talk) 16:13, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Regarding your note on my talk page regarding my using the talk page of the “Judicial Activism” article for general discussion, I didn’t see you leave a similar admonition on the talk page of the poster I was answering who had started the relevant section. In that section, he matter-of-factly notes that Bush vs. Gore should be used as an example of judicial activism in a manner that amounted to a political editorial disguised as a question. It is impossible to address that naked assertion without discussing the relevant facts involved and noting why one either agrees or disagrees with the suggestion that such be included in the article. Such is inherent within the subject and cannot be avoided in discussion.
As it is said, what’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. I’ve never noted geese having political biases...before. HistoryBuff14 ( talk) 18:24, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
--Agreed and thank you. HistoryBuff14 ( talk) 18:42, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello DKqwerty, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Lynda Mason Green, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Courcelles 12:28, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
You may or may not remember but you left a message based on my 'edits' regardng changing plot to story. I completely understand that you have set guidelines and you will adhere to them as necesary. Personally I believe that these guidelines regarding what is story and plot, such as considering a lengthy article with detail 'plot', to be wrong. However I will keep that as my own opinion and do promise not to make anymore changes unless I become I full member, to which I will then discuss my opinions rather than edit on a whim. I also see, now, that my changes were made in vain as people will revert it due to it being their 'job'. Just so we're clear I'm not trying to be sarcastic or smart or "attack" you (as a person), just wanted to say my piece. Thanks.
We should take exceptional care to modify quotes only where needed. Having his first name and the link is overkill, and we should only have one. My personal preference is to keep the link because that provides sufficient context without actually modifying the quote. But if you prefer the first name instead I'd be happy to cede to that. However; both? Not really a good idea. -- Errant ( chat!) 14:38, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
You know, it's actually nice to edit with someone who knows the WPedit policy so well. I hope the latest update works for you, and I appreciate the edit summaries you put in, they do help me understand better.-- 68.81.89.233 ( talk) 00:50, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
What is required is verifiable sources, not your opinion as to its neutrality. And it's "a neutral" source. Why not just come out and be honest and say you want the article to misleading imply that Assange fled Swedish justice when fully sited sources show him to have been given permission by the courts. Unless you can provide anything verifiable to the opposite. And I also see a reference to "a lawyer", since when is that "an neutral" source?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/guyrundle
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_Assange Viralmeme ( talk) 17:27, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed you tried to shrink the size of this image. Another editor undid your change before I could. I would just like to remind you, Wikimedia's policy on image size, per their upload form, is to "Upload the highest resolution file that is possible" regardless what is being photographed.
Thegreyanomaly ( talk) 00:57, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Per your request, I've left a response to your WP:BRD request. -- Teancum ( talk) 14:12, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
The dispute about romanizations for katakana words of non-Japanese origin has now entered mediation and is currently being talked about in this discussion page section. If you still wish to participate, please join the discussion. Thank you. Prime Blue ( talk) 14:09, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
Greetings, DKqwerty. An anonymous editor has started a discussion about your recent reversion of his edits, at Talk:Owsley Stanley#Mention of Stanley's name in a Frank Zappa song. Feel free to reply there. Thanks. — Mudwater ( Talk) 00:18, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
Template:1/2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —
Justin (koavf)❤
T☮
C☺
M☯
19:30, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I not agree to your personal definition of overlinking it's not backed by our policies, please step back from reverting again. In contrast, our link policies Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Linking encouraging a strong interconnection of pages with non-trivial subjects, "Remake" (in context video games) is a non-trivial concept not well known in broader audience. Shaddim ( talk) 10:49, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nintendo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HD ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:48, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
I stopped on WOIO and desisted on that one after two attempts; the rest of my reverts have been dealing with TRCG under other IP's. Nate • ( chatter) 03:12, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
There is no evidence, only unsourced opinion, that the links to the Budweiser Clydesdale commercials on YouTube are copyright violations. For one thing, the earliest link dates to 1967 and might even be in the public domain by now. Montanabw (talk) 23:57, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Is there some WP authority for the proper length of headings? I agree that the headings prior user:Theonesean's revision were too long. Absent specific WP rule or advisory guidance, it seems some middle ground is appropriate. Several words for a heading is common on WP. Regards, Paavo273 ( talk) 17:08, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I'm curious why a redirect page I created here doesn't actually redirect, it just shows the redirect page itself. Any help is appreciated, thanks! DKqwerty ( talk) 01:12, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Well, none of those characters expressed a belief in God and seem to be indifferent to God. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.140.66.148 ( talk) 18:14, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
I'm afraid that I'm going to have to disagree with you there. In good faith I have removed images that I felt did not belong on Wikipedia, or at least on the pages they were on. The uploader will receive a notification that the image has been orphaned, and the uploader can protest the removal at which point discussion can take place as to whether the image should be kept or removed. We cannot allow progress in improving Wikipedia to be halted by constant bureaucracy or democracy. Why bring an image to deletion when the outcome will be the same regardless of whether it's deleted by being orphaned or deleted by being voted on? - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 18:44, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
So, I saw this. I agree, his edits aren't accomplishing much, and its a little irritating to see them on my watchlist all the time, but you can't really tell him to stop editing the article over it. He's not really breaking any policy, and the article is both in relatively poor shape, and inactive. It needs clean up, he's making the changes in good-faith, and its not like he's causing edit conflicts right and left or something... Anyways, just thought I'd throw that out there... Sergecross73 msg me 15:30, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi DKqwerty,
thanks a lot for your advice and teaching. Happy editing to you too.
--
Mauro Lanari (
talk)
01:28, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mario Kart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Invisibility cloak ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:16, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
It makes no sense what you say. The series is part of Nick's current programming. No particular purpose. -- Connie (A.K) ( talk) 04:13, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
You previously participated in the merge discussion for this at Talk:List_of_variations_of_the_Mega_Drive#Proposed_merge_with_Sega_Genesis. The nominator has restarted it again at Talk:Sega_Genesis#Merge.2FRedirect_Proposal:_List_of_variations_of_the_Mega_Drive. I think it only fair that those who participated previously be told. Dream Focus 23:59, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Give me a little time to work on them. I may not have the sources instantly, so I will put {{ ref improve section}}. Even so, I think that the titles and lyrics of some entries are enough attribution, but if you disagree, I'll be happy to find some sources. Please don't remove them outright and then make 3RR accusations. Thanks, Epicgenius ( talk) 19:29, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amarcord, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Letterboxing. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:24, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi, please review the diff of your reversion of my edits to the mentioned article. Your edit summary doesn't match what you have actually done, I think you may have made an error: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Speech_recognition_software_for_Linux&type=revision&diff=801673337&oldid=799936826 -- I think you may have intended to revert Bert Niehaus's edits, not mine. Thanks. -- BurritoBazooka If you reply here, please add {{ping|BurritoBazooka}} to your message 15:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, DKqwerty. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, DKqwerty. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, DKqwerty. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
WBFS. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 16#WBFS until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –
void
xor
23:28, 16 July 2021 (UTC)