From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Crowdsourcing Information Worldwide: The Wikipedia Phenomenon
Tuesday 25-Oct-2011 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM EDT
Rutgers University Libraries --Alexander Library
(based on previous talks in New York )
Why is Wikipedia used
Importance--by far the most used online encyclopedia-- and the most reference source in the world -- over 338 million unique visitors a month
Comparisons
Language reach: over 260 languages
Statistics
Geographic reach
Extensive subject coverage -- 16 million articles, 5 million illustrations and media files
How did it get to this status?
Comprehensive modern encyclopedia
Wikipedia:Five pillars
Neutral point of view
Wikipedia is free content (CC 3.0-BY-SA) that anyone can edit
Open community and open community processes
Wikipedia does not have firmly fixed rule
Overall organization
Wikimedia Foundation: $9 million/yr (45% for technology), 50 paid staff.
Projects by type and Language:
National chapters
Germany
UK
France
(40 more)
India
(potential US chapters)
English Wikipedia (enWP)
3.4 million articles, 356,000 active users
open immediate editing, even without registration
1000 new articles a day
subject WikiProjects, Workgroups & Taskforces): Chemistry, Military History, ...
subject list
function Wikiprojects: Copyediting, Categorization
project list
Processes
Factors affecting the academic use of Wikipedia
Inhibiting factors and their Fixes
Lack of assured reliability: analyses of reliability, article talk pages, and projects to improve quality
Vandalism of article content: active removal of vandalism by large editor base, and passive removal by filters
Incomplete coverage: increased diversity of contributors
Weak coverage in many academic fields: increased academic participation and class projects
frequent lack of adequate referencing: growing insistence on sourcing; increasing availability of good sourcing
Instability of article content: ability to link to specific versions
Impermanence of the project as a while: mirrors
Pressure groups & cabals wider knowledgeable participation
Cultural bias
Recentist wider knowledgeable participation
Anglocentric wider knowledgeable participation
Political inclinations wider knowledgeable participation
Reliability factors applying to Wikipedia
Multiple ways to judge quality
"How to Judge the Quality of a WIkipedia Page" by Tim Farley
Large number of contributors
Varied background of contributors
Education
Interest
Geography
Language knowledge
Specialist contributors
WikiProjects and Workgroups
Screening of contributions
Recent changes
Watchlists
New Page feed
Login to start pages
Edit filters
New Pages
Patrolled pages for
Biography of Living people (forthcoming)
Quality ratings:
featured articles
Deletion
Blocking
Policy:
Reliable Sources
Policy: Not Censored
Edit histories
OTRS
Additional factors encouraging reliability
Ability to see edit history
Talk page discussions
International contributor base and links to other language Wikipedias
Negative factors affecting reliability
Concentration of editors on popular topics
Anonymity
Impermanence
Participation by academics
Inhibiting
Anti-elitism
Lack of respect for credentials
anonymity
Demographics (youth) & anti-academic attitude
Amateurism
Lack of seriousness
Pervasive low quality
Mismatch with academe
Lack of respect in academic world
Lack of clear authorship
Inability to draw original conclusions
Cooperative authorship
Distinctive prose style
Encouraging
Wikipedia Ambassadors Program
GLAM
Wikipedia:The Musical
Galleries, Libraries and Museums
[
[1] ]
Getting Started
Rules
Organization
Quality
WP:DEL ,
WP:CSD
(Administrator Login
WP:ADMIN )
Category:CSD ,
WP:PRODSUM ,
WP:AFD ,
WP:DELREV
Becoming an administrator
WP:RFA
Further Layers
WP:Bureaucrat ,
WP:CHECKUSER ,
WP:OVERSIGHT ,
WP:ARBCOM ,
WP:STEWARDS ,
WP:WMF ,
WP:JIMBO
Resources
Key Free resources for Wikipedia
Google, Google News Archive, Google Scholar, Google Books
WorldCat
PubMed
Key non-free Library Resources for Wikipedians
Further reading
Key resources
How Wikipedia Works by Phoebe Ayers, Charles Matthews, and Ben Yates (also available in
print )
the free online version of Wikipedia: The Missing Manual by John Broughton (also available in
print )
"Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia" by Darren W. Logan, Massimo Sandal, Paul P. Gardner, Magnus Manske1, Alex Bateman in PLOS Computational Biology (2010) 6(9): e1000941. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000941
[2]
"Information quality discussions in Wikipedia" by Besiki Stvilia, Michael B Twidale, Les Gassner, & Linda C. Smith (2005)
[3]
"Who The Hell Writes Wikipedia, Anyway?" by Henry Blodget, Jan. 3, 2009 Business Insider
[4]
books about Wikipedia
Notes
WP: as a prefix means a page located in the part of Wikipedia devoted to discussing the project, rather than the actual articles
WT: as a prefix means the talk pages for WP: pages